Exodus 18:21  21 "But choose men of ability from all of the people. They must have respect for God. You must be able to trust them. They must not try to get money by cheating others. Appoint them as officials.   

Misc Interesting Info



Sign the Petition to Impeach Him Now! 




a new poll indicated nearly half of Americans believe Obama has “gone too far” in expanding his power, and one-third of all voters believe he “should be impeached and removed from office.”

a stunning new poll shows that President Obama has passed George W. Bush in unpopularity, despite the liberal Democrap media’s continued adoration of the 44th president.   According to The Washington Examiner:   Angry and frustrated voters are planning to use the midterm elections in one month to tell President Obama they oppose his agenda, the highest “no vote” percentage in the last 16 years measured by Gallup.
Jefferson’s words understandably resonate with patriotic Americans disgruntled by Obama’s repeated and tyrannical derelictions and abuses of power  The language of the American Declaration of Independence marks this as the point at which the people’s right to resist tyranny becomes a natural obligation. It was the standard the founders of the United States articulated and upheld when they revolted against the tyranny initiated by certain enactments of King George III, which they enumerated in the Declaration.  The impeachment provisions of the U.S. Constitution give people the means and opportunity to substantiate the morally reasonable basis for their stand in defense of liberty.  Clearly, therefore, even if a stubbornly tyrannical Senate minority prevents conviction, as a matter of practical fact the process of impeachment makes an indispensable contribution to the moral cause of liberty. In light of this, have you joined the Pledge to Impeach mobilization? If so, are you doing everything you can to encourage others you can influence to do likewise? In these last weeks before the November elections, the duty involved grows more imperative with every passing day.
In his acclaimed book, "Catching Our Flag: Behind the Scenes of a Presidential Impeachment," Rogan, the former impeachment manager in the House of Representatives, lays out the template to lead the reader, step by step, of how to get a very reluctant Congress to impeach a very popular president. If it worked against Bill Clinton, who enjoyed a 75 percent approval rating, it will work against Barack Obama and his continually pathetic poll numbers.

"Scandal – The Card Game" is a contest between players to create the best cases for impeachment by collecting and displaying valuable evidence ("case") cards. Game play focuses on four scandals properly plaguing the president of the United States: Benghazi, Abuse of Power, IRS and H.S.A. This game is fun to play and historically accurate. The card images are engaging and compelling, making the deck itself an attractive conversation piece.
Now Larry Klayman, the former Justice Department lawyer and founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is suing to get President Obama deported.  “In sum, deportation proceedings should be immediately commenced, an investigation undertaken, a full evidentiary hearing held, and Barack Hussein Obama should be removed from the United States,” Klayman writes in his deportation petition.  The petition was sent to Thomas Homan of Enforcement Removal Operations at the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Winkowksi of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Sarah Kendall of the Office of Fraud Detection and National Security at DHS.  Klayman explained it is based “on the grounds that he has falsified various birth and other documents with regard to obtaining a U.S. passport and other privileges as an alleged American citizen.”  “It is clear, based on a mountain of evidence as set forth in and attached to the petition, that the president and his agents have falsified documents, such as his birth certificate and Social Security number, to qualify for the privileges of American citizenship such that his citizenship, which is based on false pretenses, must be nullified,” Klayman said.  “The U.S. Constitution requires that to be eligible to be president (or vice president) a person must be a “natural born citizen” and that all federal elected officials must be citizens,” he wrote.  Then followed a technical description of the problem for Obama;  A young woman giving birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen (and was himself deported) did not have the legal capacity to pass along American citizenship to such child, a report for the Western Journalism Center confirmed“When enacted in 1952, section 301 (of federal immigration laws at the time) required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for 10 years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The 10-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period,” the Western Journalism Center’s report explained.  Ann Dunham was only 18 years old upon Barack Hussian Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961. Her own date of birth in Wichita, Kansas, was November 29, 1942. She turned 14 on November 29, 1956. Therefore in contrast to the law’s requirement, she had lived only 4 1/2 years from her 14th birthday up until Barack Hussein Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961 – and apparently not all of those years actually within the United States.  Thus because of the requirement to reside in the United States continuously for five years after becoming 14 and a total of 10 years in the United States overall, Barack Hussein Obama could not acquire U.S. citizenship through his mother Ann Dunham. At the very least, he would have had to apply at some point for naturalization.  He cites as supporting evidence those facts reported in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” by Dr. Jerome Corsi, “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?” an ebook, and another ebook, “A Question of Eligibility.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clMEg4-N7ao&feature=player_detailpage         President Obama’s oath to uphold, protect and preserve our constitution.
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/558631/201101031909/Americas-Timeless-Constitution.aspx                 What the left refuses to admit is that the Constitution is a document of universal and timeless principles. It is amendable and in its original form still speaks to us today through its humane protection of individual rights and necessary limits on government power.  There is no policy question so tightly twisted that it can't unwind it, no legal puzzle too confounding for it to resolve. It is written in a vernacular far more straightforward than the baffling statutes written today by lawmakers who maim our language. If it is confusing to the political left, clear understanding is no further away than a copy of the the Federalist Papers.  its simple brilliance becomes increasingly evident. It deserves respect, not the contempt heaped upon it by the left.  
http://www.amazon.com/Original-Argument-Federalists-Constitution-Adapted/dp/1451650612        get your copy of the Federalist papers, become engaged, educated, informed then vote accordingly.
Ezekiel 33:8 (NIV)  When I say to the wicked, ‘You wicked person, you will surely die,’ and you do not speak out to dissuade them from their ways, that wicked person will die for[a] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood.
2 Timothy 4:2-5 (NIV)  Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction. For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry.
Matthew 18:15-17 (NIV)  15 “If your brother or sister[a] sins,[b] go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. 16 But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’[c] 17 If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.
Matthew 18:6(CEV)  It will be terrible for people who cause even one of my little followers to sin. Those people would be better off thrown into the deepest part of the ocean with a heavy stone tied around their necks!
Jeremiah 5:28 ESV They have grown fat and sleek. They know no bounds in deeds of evil; they judge not with justice the cause of the fatherless, to make it prosper, and they do not defend the rights of the needy.
Proverbs 28:4 (NLV)  Those who turn away from the law praise the sinful, but those who keep the law fight against them.
Proverbs 6:12-19 (NLT)  12 What are worthless and wicked people like? They are constant liars,13 signaling their deceit with a wink of the eye, a nudge of the foot, or the wiggle of fingers.  14 Their perverted hearts plot evil,
and they constantly stir up trouble.  15 But they will be destroyed suddenly, broken in an instant beyond all hope of healing.  16 There are six things the Lord hates— no, seven things he detests:  17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue,
hands that kill the innocent,  18 a heart that plots evil, feet that race to do wrong,  19 a false witness who pours out lies, a person who sows discord in a family.
Psalm 94:20-23 (NLT)  20 Can unjust leaders claim that God is on their side—leaders whose decrees permit injustice?  21 They gang up against the righteous and condemn the innocent to death.  22 But the Lord is my fortress; my God is the mighty rock where I hide.  23 God will turn the sins of evil people back on them.  He will destroy them for their sins.  The Lord our God will destroy them.
Isaiah 58:5-8 (NLV)  Will you call this time without eating a day that pleases the Lord? Is not the time without eating which I choose, a time to take off the chains of sin, and to take the heavy load of sin off the neck? Is it not a time to let those who suffer under a sinful power go free, and to break every load from their neck? Is it not a time to share your food with the hungry, and bring the poor man into your house who has no home of his own? Is it not a time to give clothes to the person you see who has no clothes, and a time not to hide yourself from your own family? Then your light will break out like the early morning, and you will soon be healed. Your right and good works will go before you. And the shining-greatness of the Lord will keep watch behind you.
Job 12:13-24 (NIV)  13 “To God belong wisdom and power;  counsel and understanding are his.  14 What he tears down cannot be rebuilt; those he imprisons cannot be released.  15 If he holds back the waters, there is drought;
    if he lets them loose, they devastate the land.  16 To him belong strength and insight; both deceived and deceiver are his.  17 He leads rulers away stripped  and makes fools of judges.  18 He takes off the shackles put on by kings
    and ties a loincloth[
a] around their waist.  19 He leads priests away stripped  and overthrows officials long established.  20 He silences the lips of trusted advisers   and takes away the discernment of elders.  21 He pours contempt on nobles   and disarms the mighty.  22 He reveals the deep things of darkness  and brings utter darkness into the light.  23 He makes nations great, and destroys them;  he enlarges nations, and disperses them.  24 He deprives the leaders of the earth of their reason;  he makes them wander in a trackless waste.
Joel 3:2  (ESVI will gather all the nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. And I will enter into judgment with them there, on behalf of my people and my heritage Israel, because they have scattered them among the nations and have divided up my land,
Amos 9:14-15"’I will bring my people Israel back from exile. They will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them. They will plant vineyards and drink their wine; they will make gardens and eat their fruit. I will plant Israel in their own land, never again to be uprooted from the land I have given them’"
(Obama, Biden, Hillary, Kerry, Democraps all.)
Daniel 8:25 (NLV)  25 He will do well by using his false ways and lies, and will think of himself as great. He will destroy many who are taking it easy. He will even go against the Prince of princes. Yet he will be destroyed, but not by a human hand.
Proverbs 26:28 (NLV)  28 A lying tongue hates those it crushes, and a mouth that speaks false words destroys.
Obama has some company in the basement of military approval ratings. It seems his former Secretary of State (and current Democratic nominee for president) Hillary Clinton has something in common with the current commander-in-chief: a dismal 15% favorability rating among active and former service members. The numbers are jaw dropping when you consider that just 3% have a “very favorable” impression of the former First Lady -- while an overwhelming 81% hold negative views.  Obviously, Clinton has been a polarizing person in the last several years for the military, who watched her botch, lie, and cover-up the incident in Benghazi, which led to the deaths of a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.
In the military realm, McInerney said it starts with a relentless air campaign of 500-1,000 sorties a day, compared with recent statistics showing the U.S. drops 18 bombs per day. In comparison, the U.S. averaged 1,100 sorties per day during the Gulf War and 800 per day during major combat operations in Operation Iraqi Freedom.  But the general said the targets are just as important as the intensity.  "We need to have an air campaign that takes out all the lines of communication, meaning the highways," McInerney said. "So Highway 47 from Raqqa, the capital of ISIS in Syria, to Mosul, nothing should move on that. Highway 1 from Mosul down to Baghdad, nothing should move on that. In other words, you start starving out everybody in Raqqa and in Mosul."  He said there should be two other areas high on the hit list.  "Number two, you want to get their command and control, headquarters, etc., which we know where they are. Number three, we want to take out the petroleum and the vehicles that ship the oil," said McInerney, who also listed the destruction of 60 terrorist training camps among the top priorities.  McInerney said concentrating that much air power on those valued targets would make an immediate difference.  "You'd see that their ability to move, to execute, to do anything, as the caliphate they can't even protect their own people," he said.  Since the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris, France has been launching highly publicized airstrikes on ISIS targets, but McInerney said that's barely a drop in the bucket compared to what's needed.  "They're flying 10 sorties a day. That's not the template for anything," he said, while admitting the French campaign is still more intense than the current U.S. effort.  The proof of our ineffectiveness, said McInerney, can be seen in satellite images of Raqqa.
(How many bombs dropped & targets are hit are a better measure vs. sorties.)

During Obama’s presidency the influence of Ayatollah Khamenei’s Iranian Shiite regime has spread across the world like the proverbial wildfire, reaching from North Africa into Iraq, Lebanon (via Hezbollah), Syria (via Assad whose red line on chemical weapons famously faded into invisibility), Gaza (via improved relations with Hamas) and now into Yemen (via the Houthis) and undoubtedly a number of other places, including Venezuela, North Korea and Cuba.  And our president, consciously or unconsciously or both, has had as much to do as anyone with the creation of this nascent, soon-to-be nuclear armed and missile-ready  fundamentalist “Greater Persia.”  No wonder the Sunni Saudis are alarmed — they have been for a long time — and no wonder Obama suddenly decided to replace Biden in paying a condolence visit to Riyadh for the death of King Abdullah.  He has some powerful fence-mending to do that pretend bowing and scraping may not so easily solve.
Much of this Iran-coddling began back when the Green Movement was in the streets of Tehran seeking the overthrow of the ayatollahs and chanting “Obama, Obama… Are you with us or are you with them?” Our president did not respond.   He was raised in Sunni Indonesia. And, yes, Sunnis — notably ISIS, Boko Haram and AQAP — are leading the way in the public butchery department for the moment and need to be opposed with all our might.
In reality, of course, Obama's father and his ancestors came from Kenya, where Shi'a Islam is rare. Most Kenyan Muslims are Sunnis and leaven their faith with pre-Islamic African traditions and beliefs.  In Persian, O-ba-ma means "He's with us," and Barack Hussein can loosely be translated as "blessings of Hussein," an allusion to Ali's son, another imam revered by the Shi'ites.
In a new poll, Obama's approval numbers are in the basement when it comes to at least 15 major policy issues. The rest of his report card—on health care, the economy, gun rights, abortion, foreign policy, immigration, and more—was a solid F. And based on his latest priorities, that isn't about to change.
Obama is not exactly what you’d call accomplished — unless, that is, you think that ceding Iraq and Syria to ultra-fanatical Islamic State group terrorists, ruining our health care system and racking up a massive deficit is an accomplishment.
However, was he always like that? Well, a recent meme that’s been passed around social media recently examined where three major world leaders — Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama — were at age 23.  The “Choom Gang,” for the uninitiated, was a group of students who originally met at Obama’s exclusive high school, the Punahou School in Honolulu. According to a book by David Maraniss, to “choom” means to smoke marijuana, and boy did Barack ever do so.  As you can see, that’s clearly far more accomplished than being an IDF special forces member or in the employ of the KGB. After all, by the age of 23, he’d invented not one but two pot smoking terms!

2) Four people are dead in Benghazi because of her: It seems hard to believe that it’s even possible, but there were more than 600 ignored security requests related to Libya and the consulate in Benghazi.  (the Brits and Salvation Army left before and no rescue or response team sent after either, she can NOT be trusted with our national security)
3) She was one of the worst Secretaries of State in U.S. history
5) She’s better at surviving sleazy scandals than anyone else
The Romans had bread and circuses to keep the masses passive and unthinking. We have electronic gadgets, drugs and pornography. Like the Roman Empire, we too may decline and fall. What happened in Paris may be just the beginning.
With the "global warming" zealots predicting catastrophic consequences over the next century, I wonder if anyone has studied how accurate five-day weather forecasts turn out to be.  Cheap shots at the police by politicians and the media are in fact very expensive, in terms of the human lives that are lost when the effectiveness of law enforcement is undermined. In what part of the world is the situation better for America than it was when Barack Obama became President and Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State? If you want an easier question, in what part of the world is the situation worse?  The way the Obama administration's Department of Justice has been used politically to put local police under siege, and to shield the administration's own law-breakers, suggests that the Department of Justice should be taken out of the control of any future administration, and made an independent agency like the Government Accountability Office.  Have we become a country whose leaders are charlatans, and whose people are sheep?
Americans heard from five liberals bent on furthering the agenda that's put our nation on the financial, moral, and international brink. Together, they showed no remorse for the misguided (destructive, dangerous) policies of the Obama administration
pie-in-the-sky, free-ice-cream-for-everyone (taxpayers beware), Socialist pander bears..
in 1778, at Valley Forge, however, Gen. George Washington approved the dismissal of a soldier for “attempting to commit sodomy,” with “abhorrence and detestation of such infamous crimes,” according to Washington’s papers at the Library of Congress.  On Mar. 10, 1778, at Valley Forge, Gen. George Washington approved the dismissal from service of  Lt. Frederick Gotthold Enslin for “attempting to commit sodomy” with another soldier.  In the first president’s papers at the Library of Congress is a series of orders with the title, “Head Quarters, V. Forge, Saturday, March 14, 1778.” It includes the following entry
“At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th March 1778) Lieutt. [Frederick Gotthold] Enslin of Colo. Malcom's Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier; Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false Accounts, found guilty of the charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th. Article 18th. Section of the Articles of War and do sentence him to be dismiss'd the service with Infamy.  “His Excellency the Commander in Chief [George Washington] approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return; The Drummers and Fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting for that Purpose.”
Washington commissioned the building of his own navy, called "Washington's Secret Navy." His six schooners carried an iconic banner, a flag emblazoned with a pine tree and the call to "Appeal to Heaven." The flag was a pointed reminder of the colonists' need to turn to God during the revolution as they faced insurmountable odds.
I am joining other believers and patriotic Americans who are committing to Appeal to Heaven in prayer for our beleaguered nation.   I hope you’ll join us in this important commitment:
You may remember President Ronald Reagan acknowledging the Noahide Laws for the National Day of Reflection’ celebration.  President George H.W. Bush and the 102nd U.S. Congress officially recognized the Seven Universal Laws of Noah in legislation which was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the United States indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:h.j.res.104.enr:            that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization. They also acknowledged that the Seven Laws of Noah are the foundation upon which civilization stands and that recent weakening of these principles threaten the fabric of civilized society, and that justified preoccupation in educating the Citizens of the United States of America and future generations is needed. For this purpose, this Public Law designated March 26, 1991 as Education Day, U.S.A’.
Many people are just unaware that Judaism is a religion of dual covenants, one for Jews and another for Gentiles. According to Jewish teaching, the Torah of Moses contains a covenant (given at Mt Sinai) binding on the Jewish people consisting of 613 commandments, and another known as the ‘Covenant of Noah’ consisting of seven commandments which is binding on all the peoples of the world who are not Jewish.
Exodus 20:3-4   Leviticus 24:15   Genesis 9:6   Genesis 2:24   Genesis 2:17   Genesis 9:3-4   Genesis 34:2-4.    
The Noahide Dinim Sub-Laws
When these laws are observed, then human relations of all kinds are enhanced by the Divine sanction, and love increases throughout the world.   http://www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=160&Parent=90    
The Covenant of the Rainbow has an inner meaning as well, which is that G-d promised that He would always accept a person's sincere personal repentance if it was directed to Him.  G-d renewed these universal laws with Noah (see beginning of Genesis chapter 9), they were meant not just for Noah and his immediate family, but for all of Noah's descendents (i.e. all nations, for all time) as G-d's basis for civilized human society.
A Noahide who has sinned against G-d or his fellow  man must repent and be sorry for what he has done. He  must promise to himself that he will not commit this sin  again. He will make a personal prayer to G-d, requesting  mercy. If he has hurt a fellow person, he must request  that person's forgiveness. If he has done damage to that  person's property or body, he must compensate him. If he  has done damage to himself, to his health or property or  his family, he must make amends.
Primary Documents in American History
(Democraps’ Hope & Change w/ some Fundamental Transformation  foreign policy)  The prophets Joel, Zachariah and Ezekiel all described the surrounded nations gathering together against Jerusalem in the last days,” he said. “Five years ago, it was inconceivable to think the president of Turkey would be talking about the need for the Turks to regain control of Jerusalem.”  With the Middle East and North Africa rapidly devolving into chaos, Turkey bears watching. As a traditional ally of the United States, it will be given freer rein to maneuver and exploit that chaos. Richardson paints a scenario where Turkey will eventually go to war with Egypt, and those two countries have increasingly been at odds since the Muslim Brotherhood government of Muhammad Morsi was defeated in Egypt.  Saudi Arabia has sparred with Iran in Yemen, Syria remains on fire with civil war, and multiple terrorist groups are vying for control of Libya. Erdogan sees all this and believes this state of war has clouded the vision of Muslims from their true aspiration of marching on Jerusalem.  “Khalifat (Caliph) literally is one who rules the world and now Erdogan wants to fulfill Zechariah 12 and 14 where Jerusalem becomes the ‘cup of trembling’ to ‘all surrounding nations’ when they storm against Jerusalem to annihilate all Israel.”
In translation, achieving “true and pure equality” would require forcing women to sign up for the draft — something that has never occurred in American history.  Serving in the military requires the utmost strength, endurance and persistence. Yet after 29 women failed the Marine’s rigorous Infantry Officer Course last spring, the Marine Corps — under pressure from the White House — actually considered lowering its standards to make it easier for women to enlist.  Apparently, the White House is more concerned with using the military to perform social experiments than it is with actually keeping American forces strong and ready for war.  It is the height of absurdity, especially in this day and age, when threats to our national security — from the Islamic State group, from Russian President Vladimir Putin, etc. — abound.
(Obama, Biden & Hillary helped create ISIS)  The documents were obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Washington watchdog Judicial Watch.  They confirm WND reporting over the past three years of evidence that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens was involved in shipping weapons from Benghazi to support the al-Qaida-affiliated militias fighting the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, effectively arming the Sunni jihadists who morphed into ISIS.  “If the American people had known the truth – that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top administration officials knew that the Benghazi attack was an al-Qaida terrorist attack from the get-go – and yet lied and covered this fact up – Mitt Romney might very well be president,” Fitton observed.  “These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists,” Fitton stated.  During the immediate aftermath of, and following the uncertainty caused by, the (Obama & Hillary directed) downfall of the (Qaddafi) regime in October 2011 and up until early September of 2012, weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles located in Benghazi, Libya were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the ports of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria.  Judicial Watch noted the sectarian direction of the war in Syria was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the “grave danger” of the rise of ISIS.   The DIA document noted the following:  This creates the ideal atmosphere for AQI [al Qaeda Iraq] to return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi, and will provide a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy, the dissenters. ISI could also declare an Islamic state through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of its territory.
The White House (Obama, Biden, Hillary) made a conscious decision, he said, when it sponsored the radical jihadists who later became the Jabhad al-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, to fight the Assad regime.  Flynn also said that he backed a 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document that recently was obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request.  Indeed, two years later, in June 2014, ISIS declared the creation of an Islamic State, or caliphate, and continues to occupy Mosul and Ramadi, which Iraqi forces still haven’t been able to extricate.
Also, the New York Times reported March 25, 2013, American intelligence officers helped Arab governments “shop for weapons” for Syrian rebels and vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons. In March 2011, Reuters reported Obama had signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for the rebel forces in Libya seeking to oust Gaddafi, quoting U.S. government officials. Also that month, the London Independent reported the U.S. asked Saudi Arabia if it could supply weapons to the rebels in Benghazi
(Democraps-the party of Lies & Coverups, Dishonest & Untrustworthy)  Pompeo questioned why no officials at the State Department involved in the decision-making in Libya were held accountable for the security failures there.  Pompeo, R-Kan., analyzed the number of security requests Stevens made in 2012 and found there to be more than 600.  Jordan also read emails from Clinton that reveal she also told the Egyptian prime minister that the attacks were not a reaction to the YouTube video.  “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film,” Jordan read. “It was a planned attack. Not a protest.’”
(LIARS ALL)  September 12: Clinton and President Obama issue statements condemning both the video and the attacks.
September 13: Press Secretary Jay Carney condemns video and violence at a news conference.
September 14: The bodies of slain Americans return to Andrews Air Force Base. Obama again blames the YouTube video.
September 16: U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appears on Sunday talk shows and says the attacks were provoked by the video, exclusively.
September 25: Obama appears at the United Nations, denouncing “a crude and disgusting video that sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”  September 27: The “Innocence of Muslims” film-maker Mark Basseley Youseff is arrested and denied bail for a “probation violation.”
Why did the administration go to all this trouble? A memo, sent by Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said that one of the “goals” of Rice’s appearances was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not in a broader failure of policy.”
Outgoing Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno told Fox News on Wednesday that a continued U.S. troop presence in the region would have kept Iraq on a positive track.  “It’s frustrating to watch it,” Odierno said. “I go back to the work we did in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and we got it to a place that was really good. Violence was low, the economy was growing, politics looked like it was heading in the right direction.”  “I think it would have been good for us to stay,” he said, adding that he had recommended leaving 30,000-35,000 U.S. personnel in Iraq — a recommendation that Obama, in his rush to keep an ill-considered campaign promise to his base, ignored.  “If we had stayed a little more engaged, I think maybe it might have been prevented,” Odierno told Fox News. “I’ve always believed the United States played the role of honest broker between all the groups and when we pulled ourselves out, we lost that role.”  Odierno also said that continued troop cuts were impacting the Army’s ability to do its job. In 2010, the Army had 570,000 soldiers, Newsmax reported. That’s down to 490,000 today and slated to hit 450,000.  “In my mind, we don’t have the ability to deter. The reason we have a military is to deter conflict and prevent wars.
(the religion of peace--coming soon to America thanks to Democraps..)   The ministry stated: “At least 150 females, including pregnant women, were executed in Fallujah by a militant named Abu Anas Al-Libi after they refused to accept jihad marriage.”  This is not the first time ISIS has committed sexually related crimes. ISIS is also reported to runs brothels and keeps sex slaves.
(Coddling Terrorists—Democrap Style)  Unlike Obama, the Chinese apparently have no problems labeling terror as what it is and doing whatever is necessary to “stop terrorism and severely punish terrorists,” as its leaders have in the past pledged to do.  Obama would do well to follow suit, but apparently, he prefers making excuses for terrorists and — even worse — releasing them from our custody, much like he has done with the terrorists at Gitmo.  In June 2014, the Chinese government executed 13 Muslims for having committed terror attacks in the region of Xinjiang.  “The 13 criminals had planned violent terrorist attacks and ruthlessly killed police officers, government officials and civilians, which took innocent lives, caused huge property losses and seriously endangered public security,” China’s official press agency, Xinhua, announced at the time.
The Pentagon has confirmed to WND that the Islamic State has seized enough radioactive materials from captured Iraqi facilities to develop “dirty bombs,” just as ISIS’ recent English-language magazine, Dabiq, claimed.
The Islamic State has billions of dollars in the bank, so they call on their wilayah (Province) in Pakistan to purchase a nuclear device through weapons dealers with links to corrupt officials in the region. The weapon is then transported overland until it makes it to Libya, where the mujahidin move it south to Nigeria.  "Drug shipments from Colombia bound for Europe pass through West Africa, so moving other types of contraband from East to West is just as possible. The nuke and accompanying mujahidin arrive on the shorelines of South America and are transported through the porous borders of Central America before arriving in Mexico and up to the border with the United States.   "From there it’s a quick hop through a smuggling tunnel and hey presto, they’re mingling with another 12 million 'illegal' aliens in America with a nuclear bomb in the trunk."  "And if not a nuke, what about a few thousand tons of ammonium nitrate explosive? That’s easy enough to make."  The piece, according to the Independent, also discussed how the militant Islamic group Boko Haram and others are uniting to create a global movement.
First, ISIS is a “self-generated, fully-fledged, transnational insurgency,” which is much more than a mere terrorist group, said Dr. Sebastian Gorka, chair of military theory at Marine Corps University. Because it views its mission as re-establishing a caliphate, it seeks to hold territory, which al-Qaeda did not. It now holds a swath of Iraq and Syria that is larger than the United Kingdom.  Second is the wealth. Gorka said ISIS raided the Iraqi National Bank a second time recently and netted an additional $823 million in cash, making it the “richest non-state threat group in modern human history.”  Considering the 9/11 attacks cost al-Qaeda just $500,000, this means ISIS is capable of more.  Third is the raw numbers. ISIS has recruited between 16,000 and 20,000 fighters from 90 different countries in the past nine months “ISIS sees itself as uniting the jihad,” she said.
An Interactive Timeline of 73 Islamist Terror Plots Since 9/11
Our commander in chief, in fact, never used "relentless" air power. He held back the lethal force of U.S. air power to "minimize collateral damage."   As a result, ISIS grew in strength and projected from its Syrian base in Raqqa its own strikes against a Russian airliner, killing all 244 civilians on board, and soft targets in the heart of Paris, killing and wounding almost 500.
The American president called it a "setback"; the French president called it an "act of war" and vowed revenge.  On Sunday, France started bombing key targets in Raqqa, hitting ISIS command and recruitment centers, ammo dumps and training camps. How did Paris know what to target? By receiving intelligence from the Obama administration.  In other words, Obama had been sitting on those bombing coordinates, refusing to let our own fighter jets use them to destroy those critical targets.  You know your leader is weak when the leader of France looks strong by comparison.  Meanwhile, Moscow has sent no fewer than 25 supersonic long-range bombers to Syria to pound other ISIS targets that Obama hasn't had the guts to hit. Moscow says that it destroyed 14 important ISIS targets with 24 air-launched cruise missiles. This comparatively massive air raid was shock and awe on steroids (still not as much as either Pres. Bush’s did to kill the enemy), the kind that Obama promised but never delivered.
(Losers Obama, Biden and Hillary provide more aid & comfort to ISIS)  Russian Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev accused the United States of aiding the growth of the Islamic State group by focusing on regime change in Syria instead of defeating terrorism.  Obama has all but abdicated the area, pulling out troops and giving little support. Obama’s restrictive engagement rules have led to an estimated 75 percent of American airstrikes against the Islamic State group coming back without dropping their ordnance. 
(How many bombs dropped & targets are hit are a better measure vs. sorties.)

An Islamic State billboard I recently came across (on the Internet—not driving down the road to Raqqah, the Islamic State capital in what used to be Syria) shows a rifle affixed to a compass (the kind used for drawing arcs and measuring distances on maps), along with the inscription: “We are the ones who determine our borders, not Sykes-Picot.”  The reference is to two dead white Christian males, Sir Marc Sykes and François Georges-Picot, British and French diplomats, respectively. They were the principal negotiators of the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement that divided into nation-states Middle Eastern territories that for centuries had been possessions of the Ottoman Empire and Sunni caliphate.   From the 13th century to the 20th, the Ottoman Empire sought to conquer and expand—not least in Europe. Its collapse came about when its sultan decided to enter what became known as World War I on what turned out to be the losing side.
Shortly after the coordinated attacks, France’s socialist president announced his decision to close the borders of France. "We must ensure that no one enters to commit any crimes, and also that those who have committed crimes can be arrested if they try to leave the country."  Close the border – what a great idea! Unfortunately, France eliminated most border checkpoints as part of Europe’s Schengen agreement, which is how a Syrian so-called refugee got all the way from Serbia to Paris without being stopped.
CNN reported that the list of states refusing Syrian refugees had grown to 31. In addition to the map shown here, you can scroll down for a full list.
Who picks the Syrian refugees that resettle in the U.S.? Homeland Security? No, the United Nations, in concert with a global Islamist group.   Only Syria is a failed state, and there are no fingerprint databases to check applicants against.  The UNHCR is working "hand in hand" with an international Islamist group of 57 Muslim nations — the Organization of Islamic Cooperation — whose founding charter seeks to propagate "legitimate jihad" and "the norms of Islamic Shari'ah." Saudi-based OIC, in fact, is tied to the radical Muslim Brotherhood.  "We are delighted to work ... with the OIC," said U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres.  So it's really the U.N. and radical Islamists who are choosing your new Muslim neighbors.  While the U.N. calls its project "refugee resettlement," the Islamists call it "hijra," or immigration jihad.  "Muhammad told his followers to migrate and spread Islam in order to dominate all the lands of the world," said Ann Corcoran, author of "Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America."
our best estimate is that in their first five years in the United States each refugee from the Middle East costs taxpayers $64,370 — 12 times what the UN estimates it costs to care for one refugee in neighboring Middle Eastern countries.
(yet another Owebummer LIE from the Liar in Chief)  Wagner went on to say that by criticizing those concerned for America’s safety, Obama took a stand against America and freedom.  “He decided to pick a fight and stand up for ISIS and stand up against the side of freedom and to pick a fight with not just Republicans, but Democrats, over this refugee issue,” she stated. “It is a politicization. It is a deflecting measure.” Republican and Democrat fears over the security are justified, however, as it has been recently revealed that the immigrants are not composed of merely widows and orphans. Recent numbers have showed that the majority are men and women of military age, capable of conducting terrorist activities.

Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in,” King replied. “My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted.”
The House of Representatives Thursday defied President Obama’s threat of a veto and voted, 289-137, to impose new screening requirements on Syrian and Iraqi refugees trying to enter the United States.  The bill was supported by 47 Democrats. Only two Republicans opposed it. The House plan would bar any refugees from Syria or Iraq from entering the United States until the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Director of National Intelligence certify that each one is not dangerous.
Speaking of which, the bill itself has a severe flaw, which is that it ignores the vast majority of people — hundreds of thousands — who travel to the U.S. every single year from North Africa, the Middle East and Asia with regular visas.  For example, in 2014, according to data compiled by the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. accepted 1,984 visas from Syria, 2,181 from Iraq, 3,858 from Jordan, 2,008 from Lebanon, 7,049 from Iran, and so forth.  The legislation that just passed the House will not include any additional scrutiny for those travelers, let alone restrict travel from the region. It only applies to the limited number of people seeking refugee status out of Iraq and Syria. That’s it.  If we don’t have adequate intel on the refugees, then how do we have adequate intel on everyone else traveling from that region?
Presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz calls out @POTUS @BarackObama regarding #SyrianRefugees  It is utterly unbefitting of the president (OweDumbo) to be engaging in those kind of personal insults and attacks. And you know he also he talked about how he was belittling the Republican field as scared.  Well let me suggest something, Mr. President.  If you want to insult me.  You can do it overseas. You can do it in Turkey. You can do it in foreign countries.  But I want to encourage you, Mr. President. Come back and insult me to my face.  Let’s have a debate on Syrian refugees right now. We can do it anywhere you want. I’d prefer it in the United States not overseas where you’re making the insults. It’s easy to chop, to toss a cheap insult when no one can respond but let’s have a debate. We’ll do it on any station or any one of the tv stations would be glad to host it and let’s have a debate on your refugee policy.
But if that's the game the media wants to play, let's be consistent and hold Hillary accountable for her husband's foreign policies. At least she was in the White House at the time.  Hillary should be peppered with questions about her husband losing Osama bin Laden, failing to respond to the attack on the USS Cole and strengthening al-Qaida's resolve to attack America.  First, let's revisit Clinton's wag-the-dog war in Iraq.  From Dec. 16, 1998, to Dec. 19, 1998, Clinton dropped bombs on Iraq to distract from his Lewinsky sex scandal. Clinton claimed Saddam was making WMD, but no evidence supported his rationale.  Military experts agreed the four-day bombing campaign was odd. Even the evening news questioned the timing of Operation Desert Fox, coming as it did during the House impeachment hearings.  Clinton was impeached on Dec. 19, the last day of the bombing campaign.  A few months earlier, on Aug. 20, 1998, Clinton lobbed missiles at a pill factory in Sudan. He claimed the pill plant was manufacturing WMD for Osama bin Laden.  Operation Infinite Reach became known as "Monica's War" due to its peculiar timing.   Knowing what we know today, does Hillary defend those operations?  Then there was Bill Clinton's failure to take out al-Qaida's top terrorist, Osama bin Laden.  Just hours before the 9/11 attacks, the former president was in Australia admitting he decided to pass on a golden chance to kill the al-Qaida leader.  "I nearly got him," Clinton says in the recording of a gathering of a small group of business leaders in Melbourne on Sept. 10, 2001.  "And I could have killed him," he went on, "but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I just didn't do it."  Even after he was shown proof that bin Laden ordered the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, Clinton did nothing with the intelligence.  If Hillary's husband and political partner had done his job instead of chasing interns around the Oval Office, there probably would have been no 9/11 — or invasion of Iraq.
What the intelligence reports of Tenet's CIA actually told Bush was that al-Qaida was plotting terrorist attacks, but neither Tenet nor Bush knew how or when any such attacks would take place.  It is true, as Trump mentioned, that the relationship was dysfunctional between federal agencies who should have been helping each other, especially the CIA and the FBI. But the blame for this goes to Bill Clinton and his attorney general, Janet Reno.  Her July, 1995 "Procedures for Contacts Between the FBI and the Criminal Division Concerning Foreign Intelligence and Foreign Counterintelligence Investigations," known as "the Wall," the purpose of which was to prevent Watergate-style abuses of power, had the effect of preventing anti-terrorist agents in different agencies from communicating with one another.  It was in this context that, only seven months into the Bush administration in August 2001, Minneapolis FBI agents were denied permission to conduct a search on 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, and a New York FBI agent was refused a search request on al-Qaida operative Khalid al-Mihdhar, one of the American Airlines Flight 77 hijackers who attacked the Pentagon.  Statements like this are what lead some to wonder whether Trump is a stalking horse for Hillary Clinton — to whom he contributed generously in 2002, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Trump has also given $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, and Hillary even attended Trump's latest wedding in 2005.
(Also, while weak Democrap BJ Clinton was focused on Monica, he was weak on Mogadishu/Black Hawk Down and the USS Cole response with weakness inviting aggression forcing Bush to clean up Bill’s mess)

(Know it all Obama &  Kerry - A history lesson for them or Fundamental Transformation with extra Hope & Change for us?)
Bill Clinton, who announced a nuclear arms deal with North Korea in 1994 that ended up failing miserably, used optimistic language in his speech that sounded remarkably similar to language used by the Obama administration after this weekend’s deal with Iran.   “Today, I want to announce an important step forward in the situation in North Korea,” Clinton said in a White House address on June 22, 1994. ”This afternoon we have received formal confirmation from North Korea that it will freeze the major elements of its nuclear program… In response, we are informing the North Koreans that we are ready to go forward with a new round of talks in Geneva early next month.”  At the time, North Korea did not have confirmed nuclear weapons.  Clinton assured the American people that North Korea consented to stopping key aspects of its nuclear program and to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) inspectors to monitor the Pyongyang nuclear facility for “verification of North Korea’s agreement.”  We will suspend our efforts to pursue sanctions if there was a verifiable freeze on the nuclear program while the talks continue,” Clinton said in response to a question from reporter Helen Thomas.  Clinton called the deal a “very positive development.”  North Korea’s first nuclear weapon test occurred in October 2006, just more than twelve years after Clinton’s deal.  Clinton’s announcement sounded similar to Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent defense of the Iran deal.
Echoes of Clinton in Obama’s awful Iran deal  In announcing his nuclear framework, the president declared : “This agreement is good for the United States, good for our allies, and good for the safety of the entire world.” He said the deal requires them to “freeze [their] existing nuclear program and to accept international inspection of all existing facilities.” He said the agreement “does not rely on trust. Compliance will be certified by the International Atomic Energy Agency.” The president who spoke those words was not Barack Obama. It was Bill Clinton, on Oct 18, 1994, announcing that his administration had reached agreement on a nuclear framework with North Korea. Twelve years later, North Korea exploded a nuclear bomb. And today, Pyongyang is reportedly a few years away from having as many as 100 nuclear weapons .   The words may be similar, but the framework Obama reached with Iran is actually worse than the one Clinton negotiated with North Korea.
More than 200 retired U.S. generals and admirals added their names to the Iran nuclear agreement’s opposition this week after they sent a letter to top congressional leaders pressing lawmakers to reject the accord.  The former senior military officers contend that the deal threatens U.S. national security, noting the estimated $150 billion that will pour into Tehran if sanctions are lifted and will provide the regime with more funds to support terrorism. The letter also points to limitations of international inspections, claiming that the current framework is unverifiable and lacks credibility.  Congress has until Sept. 17 to accept or reject the deal.
You don't need long-range ballistic missiles for conventional warheads. The only reason they have these intercontinental missiles that they're developing is for a nuclear-delivery capability."  He added that "we need to treat Iran much differently with greater level of suspicion and doubt."  Vallely joined nearly 200 retired military generals and admirals in sending a letter to congressional leaders this week urging them to oppose the Iran nuclear deal after Congress returns from its recess next month.  He said the military leaders released the letter "so that people can contact their congressmen, their senators and prevent this deal from even being signed.  He said that the actions of President Barack Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and top presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett were "really bordering on treasonous grounds right now."
On a weekly basis, Iranian leaders incite crowds with shouts of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” We’re the great Satan. Israel is the little Satan. They want our destruction---so why would our government ever pave the way toward Iran possibly getting a nuclear bomb?   Even though millions of Iranians would die through retaliation, they would ostensibly die as martyrs for Jihad, therefore they’d go to paradise.   Although Iran is Shiite (representing roughly 15% of all Islam), the vast majority of Islam, the Sunni population, includes many radical Muslims as well. ISIS and Al-Qaeda are Sunni groups. Hezbollah is Shiite. One is tempted to say, pick your poison.   “….Bukhari 4,52,267 Mohammed cried out, ‘Jihad is deceit.’  “Bukhari 5,59,369 Bin Maslama volunteered to kill an enemy for Mohammed, then said, ‘Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.’ Mohammed replied, ‘You may speak falsely to him.’”  And they summarize all this in a sentence: “If deception to an enemy is advantageous to Islam, it is not a sin.”
Iran's Supreme Leader has now published his own version of "Mein Kampf," Hitler's infamous 1925-26 autobiographical tract against the Jews. A copy of Khamenei's "Palestine" landed in the hands of Gatestone Europe Chairman Amir Taheri.
As the Iranian expat wrote in the New York Post, the ayatollah uses words of hate and destruction in the volume, like " 'nabudi,' which means 'annihilation' ... 'imha,' which means 'fading out,' and, finally, there is 'zaval,' meaning 'effacement.'"  And Khamenei argues that his strategy for making the state of Israel nothing more than a memory is based on "well-established Islamic principles," one of which, as Taheri describes it, "is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims."  Teheri points out that this is a widespread Islamic belief: "Dozens of maps circulate in the Muslim world showing the extent of Muslim territories lost to the Infidel that must be recovered," including "large parts of Russia and Europe, almost a third of China, the whole of India and parts of the Philippines and Thailand."  Israel is "adou" and "doshman," translated as "enemy" and "foe," to be targeted for special attention because it is the "ally of the American Great Satan,"   As Khamenei boasts in the book, "We have intervened in anti-Israel matters, and it brought victory in the 33-day war by Hezbollah against Israel in 2006 and in the 22-day war between Hamas and Israel in the Gaza Strip."  And what replaces the vacuum of power left in the absence of the Jewish state and its "Great Satan" sponsor, America? According to the ayatollah, "the hegemony of Iran will be promoted."  Does "Iranian hegemony" not sound similar to the Nazis' infamous demands for German "Lebenstraum" or "living room," carried out by conquering other ethnic groups' lands?

It’s amazing how Democrats nuke up terrorist regimes, first with President Bill Clinton with North Korea and now with President Obama and Iran. Iran’s military is no match for America’s but Obama is making Iran look powerful because he refuses to stand up to them. President Reagan negotiated with the Soviets because they already had nukes, not to give them more, and even walked away from the negotiating table. He would have never cut a deal with a third-world terrorist regime spreading terrorism, which is exactly what Obama has done. If the Senate had real Republican leadership, it would’ve treated any agreement with Iran as a treaty. Just because Obama says it’s not a treaty doesn’t mean the Senate has to capitulate. We cannot leave it up to one man to decide the fate of our nation
Obama promised something even more sinister. Buried in the depths of the agreement, the following:
The USA shall supply “cooperation in the form of training courses and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to prevent, protect and respond to nuclear security threats to nuclear facilities and systems as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.”
In the past, the United States repeatedly misjudged other countries’ nuclear weapon programs, from the Soviet Union to China to Iraq to Libya.  In the case of Libya, the United States did not even know that the country had a nuclear program until the Libyans showed surprised Americans to their undeclared sites.   There is no reason to make Iran’s terrorist activities easier while legitimizing its nuclear program and putting Iran in a strategically stronger position in the next few years, as this deal does.   The way to fix the situation is to stop promoting the bad deal and rather devote as much effort and political capital to strengthening the sanctions regime.
The Obama administration estimates that Iranian-supplied bombs killed "hundreds" of American troops in Iraq during the war, and the president himself has explicitly acknowledged that the deal's generous sanctions relief provisions will allow the regime to enhance its world-leading financing of international terrorism. An organization called Veterans Against the Deal has something to say about that:
The Nazi regime's great hatred was Jews. Iran's great hatred is the Jewish state. The Nazis' greatest aim was to exterminate the Jews of Europe. Iran's greatest aim is to exterminate the Jewish state. Nazi Germany hated the West and its freedoms. The Islamic Republic of Iran hates the West and its freedoms. Germany sought to dominate Europe. Iran seeks to dominate the Middle East and the Muslim world. And exactly as Britain and France appeased Nazi Germany, the same two countries along with the United States have chosen to appease Iran.  Today, people mock Chamberlain. But just change the names, and you realize that we are living through a repetition of Munich. Substitute the Islamic Republic of Iran for Nazi Germany, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for Hitler, Barack Obama and John Kerry for Chamberlain, Israel for Czechoslovakia and for Europe's Jews, and the increasingly unsafe world of 2015 for the increasingly unsafe world of 1938.   In fact, there is considerably less defense for the Iran agreement -- which awards Iran $150 billion in currently frozen assets and the right to keep its nuclear program -- than there was for the Munich agreement. Prior to 1938, Hitler had not publicly proclaimed his aim to annihilate Europe's Jews. Yet, Iran has been proclaiming its intention to annihilate the Jewish state for decades. There were no massive "Death to America" demonstrations in Germany as there regularly are in Iran. In 1938, Germany had not been responsible for terror around the world as Iran is now. Nor was Germany responsible for the death of more than a thousand Americans as Iran has been.
The agreement continues the UN weapons embargo for another five years for conventional arms and eight years for missiles. However, this embargo did not stop Iran from furnishing weapons to Islamic jihadists and does not preclude it from supporting Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis with weapons.  Actions the United States should have taken:  Realize that Iran is our enemy, one that is holding Americans hostages.  Increase economic sanctions. The world failed to isolate and prevent the economic restoration of Germany in the 1930s and witnessed a full bore investment into one of the greatest war machines in history.  Implement a naval blockade against Iran and shrink the ability of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' naval forces from adversely influencing the sea lanes of commerce in the Persian Gulf.  Enable a deterioration of the stranglehold of crazed clerics that control the Iranian people.  Some will decry fear mongering and castigate anyone opposing this agreement as seeking war. Such were the claims against Sir Winston Churchill, who warned that history has a way of punishing those who pay it no attention.  Source: Allen West, "Iran Agreement: Déjà Vu All Over Again," Townhall, July 14, 2015.
Obama's deal may help Iran develop a nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapon. A 2010 Iranian military textbook reveals Tehran's growing interest in the subject.    "Iran has apparently practiced surprise EMP attacks, orbiting satellites on south polar trajectories to evade U.S. radars and missile defenses, at altitudes consistent with generating an EMP field covering all 48 contiguous United States," according to Woolsey and Pry. "Iran launched its fourth satellite on such a trajectory as recently as February 2015."  They also noted that the use of nuclear infrastructure permitted under the Iran deal makes getting an EMP weapon "relatively easy."   The recovery time from a nationwide EMP event might be anywhere from one to 10 years. In the meantime, tens of millions of Americans would likely die from starvation and/or societal collapse."   Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., has been pointing to an Iranian military textbook with over 20 passages about crippling an adversary with an EMP attack, and pairing EMP with other forms of warfare.  Yet the left makes fun of those in Congress who warn of the threat of EMP warfare.   The point seems lost on many that the Islamist rulers of Iran don't care if their own country is obliterated if the will of Allah is carried out — part of which they believe includes an apocalyptic holy war involving a 12th imam.  "Death to America" may come sooner and differently than we expect.

In my essay “Understanding Tyranny and Terror: From the French Revolution to Modern Islamism“, I argue that terrorists must be understood as motivated by a utopian vision that seeks to impose, by force, a monolithic collective in which all individual liberties are erased.  This is nothing new, and first began with the Jacobin Terror of 1793 and continued through Bolshevism, Nazism, Maoism, and the Khmer Rouge.  Today it can be seen within the international Jihad.  Poverty and lack of opportunity are not the “root causes” of terrorism.  In fact, many terrorists come from affluent backgrounds or already live in liberal democracies with their widespread opportunities.  Rather, terrorists are revolutionaries inspired by the vision of a coming collectivist paradise that will annihilate the allegedly corrupt, materialistic West.  The most important lesson to keep in mind is that terrorists are tyrants in waiting.  For America, this will involve some complicated choices among the lesser of evils.  Should we support toppling garden variety tyrants like Hosni Mubarak or Bashar al-Assad when it might increase the likelihood of a full-blown Islamist millenarian regime filling the political vacuum?
Clearly among the Bangladeshi police there are Islamic supremacists who believe that atheists such as Niloy Neel deserve to die, and that it is Muslims’ responsibility to kill them, as per the Qur’anic assurance that “Allah will punish them by your hands” (Qur’an 9:14).  “Bangladesh blogger Niloy Neel hacked to death in Dhaka,” BBC, August 7, 2015 (thanks to Lookmann): A Bangladeshi blogger known for his atheist views has been hacked to death by a gang armed with machetes in the capital Dhaka, police say.
GOP presidential hopeful Carly Fiorina, formerly the chief of Hewlett-Packard, says the federal government itself is a bigger threat to America than so-called global warming.   She said far more dangerous to America is the “web of dependencies” into which people fall, the issue of whether “people are getting a good education” and the “dangers we face around the world.”  Even, she said, “The fact our government is a vast, bloated, unaccountable, corrupt bureaucracy.”   “I think it is frankly ridiculous for the Obama administration to call ISIS a strategic distraction, and then go on to say that climate change is the single most pressing national security issue of our time.”  Well-known scientist Art Robinson has spearheaded The Petition Project which to date has gathered the signatures of 31,487 scientists who agree that there is "no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."  They say, "Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plan and animal environments of the Earth."
Carly Fiorina is a RINO in many ways in her past. She was in the McCain campaign. Two years ago she criticized Ted Cruz for government shutdown activity and so forth.  She is obviously very smart and committed and energetic and so forth, and she's right on so much of what she says, and I remember touting her.  She went back to it last night talking about the character of this country and how we're losing that when she brilliantly combined the answer to Planned Parenthood and Iran.  I thought it was well done.  It was very conservative.  But Carly, you go back to 2008, and she was right in there with Meg Whitman and McCain and so forth, part of RINO caucus. So all in all, it was a good night for conservatism, provided those articulating it mean it, which is always what's up for grabs.
Our thanks to Chris Cillizza, who writes "The Fix" blog for the Washington Post, for reminding us of just how vulnerable Carly's Hewlett-Packard record left her. He reminds us that she was closing in on California Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer in their epic 2010 contest. A few weeks before election day, they were locked in a statistical tie. Then Boxer threw the HP punch.
Her ad noted that Fiorina had laid off 30,000 workers at HP. It played a film clip of Carly saying: "when you're talking about massive layoffs — which we did — perhaps the work needs to be done somewhere else?" Then the announcer says "Fiorina shipped jobs to China and while Californians lost their jobs, Carly Fiorina tripled her salary, bought a million dollar yacht and five corporate jets." The lethal ad ends by playing a clip of Carly saying "I'm proud of my record at Hewlett-Packard."  We get it that you often have to lay off workers and outsource to protect the remaining jobs still in the U.S.. But if Romney taught us anything it is that voters don't get it.

Isaiah 42:15 (NLV)  15 I will lay waste the mountains and hills, and dry up all their plants. I will make the rivers into islands, and dry up the pools.
we might be able to save ourselves if we immediately take these necessary and drastic steps," which include:
• Increasing our reliance on alternative energy sources and using less oil and other carbon-based fuels.
• Adopting energy-efficient habits in all areas of our lives, however inconvenient they are.
• Imposing punitive taxes on inefficient or polluting activities to discourage them.
• Funneling large sums of money from developed nations such as America to Third World nations.
• In general, embracing all environmental causes.
Zombie admitted that there was "a little glitch" in his/her narrative, though. The book he/she read "was indeed about climate change," but "it wasn't about global warming at all; it was instead about 'The Coming of the New Ice Age,' and it isn't exactly 'new' — it was published in 1977." ( The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age– April 12, 1977)   the climate-change solutions that emerge will look just like those from the 1977 book warning about the coming ice age.  The delegates will demand that we cut our fossil fuel consumption; use taxpayers' money to fund expensive and unreliable renewable and alternative energy sources; increase taxes and regulations in wealthy nations; and send large sums of money from the First World to developing nations.  This is no coincidence. These "solutions" are what the climate scares have always been about. Science? Forget it.
Obama and the Vatican under the leadership of Pope Francis are equally committed to elevating climate change to a top public policy priority, ahead of issues such as the continued surge of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and its massacre of Christians.  Marc Morano, editor of the website ClimateDepot.com, called President Obama’s speech on the subject Wednesday at the Coast Guard Academy commencement “politically contrived nonsense,” arguing “scientific studies, data and history refute Obama’s climate/national security claims.”  “The president’s speech was so farcical in its claims that it hardly merits a response,” Morano said in a statement posted on ClimateDepot.com. “Contrary to the president’s claims, it seems ISIS may in fact trump ICE as a bigger concern.”  Morano said that “believing Obama’s climate claims undermines our nation’s ability to distinguish real threats from politically contrived nonsense.”
Trump found Obama’s 60 Minutes interview “sad” and “negative.” He noted the president is far too focused on climate change while other major problems remain largely unaddressed. “We have ISIS [and] 100 million people who are out of the workforce.  All he talks about is climate change, and that is not our problem folks,” said Trump. 
"I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem," Dr. Ivar Giaever announced during a speech at the 65th Nobel Laureate Conference in Lindau, Germany, last week, according to Climate Depot.   Quoting Obama's warning that "no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change," Giaever said it was a "ridiculous statement."  "I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong. Dead wrong," he said, according to Climate Depot.  Giaever, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1973, questioned the theory behind fears about rising carbon dioxide levels and said that the theory is not backed by evidence.  "Global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It's not proper. It is like the Catholic Church."  Giaever was one of more than 100 co-signers in a letter to the president in March 2009 that was critical of his stance on global warming, saying, "We the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated."
Morano, whose coming movie, “Climate Hustle,” will address the issue, said the global warming agenda isn’t about the science.  The ultimate goal is centralized planning, he said.  As the average global temperature has remained steady for more than 15 years, climate-change alarmists have been found exchanging emails questioning where the warming has gone and strategizing how to shape their message in light of the facts.  Now another obstacle has surfaced with a report that European scientists have unveiled a new scientific model based on solar cycles that shows a “mini ice age” is on the way, due to decreased solar activity.  So, finally, can the dire predictions of life-destroying “climate change” and “global warming” be put to rest?  No, said Marc Morano of Climate Depot, a leading expert on the topic. Morano contends the “global warming” movement was never about the science behind the issue; it was always about creating a global system of controlling energy production and consumption.  A London Daily Mail report on the prediction said the model suggests solar activity will fall by 60 percent during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the mini ‘”ice age” from 1645 to about 1715. During that period, known as the “Maunder Minimum,” London’s River Thames froze over and snow fields remained year-round even at lower elevations.   In 1895, the panic was over an imminent ice age. In the late 1920s, when the earth’s surface warmed less than half a degree, the media jumped on a new threat – global warming, which continued into the late 1950s. Then in 1975, a New York Times headline blared “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable.” In 1981, it was back to global warming, with the Times quoting seven government atmospheric scientists who predicted global warming of an “almost unprecedented magnitude.”  Scientist Art Robinson has spearheaded The Petition Project, which has gathered the signatures of 31,487 scientists who agree that there is “no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the earth’s climate.”
Yet data of observed reality collected from the U.N.’s International Panel on Climate Change and the U.S. National Climate Data Center does not show increasing frequency of extreme weather across the globe, whether you look at hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or floods.  As it turns out, these mandates and subsidies also prove to be barriers to the progress and innovation the Obama administration wants.  Where does it get us on the path to addressing global warming?  Just shy of nowhere, or less than 0.002 degrees Celsius using an EPA model.
here are a few things to think about while the climate alarmists yammer on about what a threat global warming is:
• Which of the two threats has actually killed someone, global warming or terrorism?
• Which threat has guns and bombs, and is eager to use them on innocent lives?
• Which said after the Paris attacks that "American blood is best, and we will taste it soon"?
• Which threat beheads and burns alive innocent people?
• Which threat believes it is doing the work of God?
• Which threat is suicidal, making it all the more dangerous?

Scientists predicted the Arctic Ice Cap would be gone by 2013 as well. By the time 2013 came around, it had grown by 533,000 square miles. That year we also saw the creation of 19,000 Manhattan-size islands worth of sea ice, the quietest tornado season in six decades, and the calmest hurricane season in three decades*. Our air quality is also better than ever, according to the EPA.   So, scientists were wrong about the resilience of sea ice, they were wrong about global cooling in the 1970s, and they could be wrong about rising global temperatures that seemed to have plateaued almost two decades ago, according to the UK Metrological Office.   Oh, and those new EPA regulations that are aimed at combating this phantom threat are going to do little; EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy seems to have admitted to it.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."  Marcus Tullius Cicero 
Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) was just as perturbed, pointing out that the agreement gives the president a "diamond-encrusted, glow-in-the-dark AmEx card." "And it has a special feature," he went on. "The president gets to spend it now, and they don't even send him the bill. They send the bill to your kids and my kids. It's a pretty nifty card. You get to spend it, and it's somebody else's problem."
Why anyone would think that criminals who disobey other laws, including laws against murder, would obey gun control laws is a mystery. A disarmed population makes crime a safer occupation and street violence a safer sport.   People who know nothing about guns, and have never fired a shot in their lives, much less lived in high-crime areas, blithely say such things as, "Nobody needs a 30-shot magazine."  Really? If three criminals invaded your home, endangering the lives of you and your loved ones, are you such a sharpshooter that you could take them all out with a clip holding ten bullets? Or a clip with just seven bullets, which is the limit you would be allowed under gun laws in some places?
Young Conservatives shared a bumper sticker that took the traditional “peace symbol” often associated with liberals and added a conservative twist to it.

In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, Hitler's National Socialist German Workers' Party, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm and attack both political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches and seizures ensued for guns and dissident publications. Police revoked gun licenses of all those who were deemed not "politically reliable" to Nazism.  The Gestapo banned independent gun clubs and arrested their leaders. In reaction, the government authorized the registration of all firearms and the confiscation thereof, if required for "public safety." Gestapo counsel Werner Best issued a directive to the police forbidding issuance of firearm permits to Jews.  In 1938, Hitler signed a new Gun Control Act. Jews were prohibited from the firearms industry. The time had come to launch a decisive blow to the Jewish community in order to render it defenseless so that its "ill-gotten" property could be redistributed as an entitlement to the German "Volk." The U.S. media covered the onslaught. And when France fell to Nazi invasion in 1940, the New York Times reported how the French were now deprived of rights like free speech and firearm possession, just like the Germans. Frenchmen who failed to surrender their firearms within 24 hours were subject to the death penalty.
Ben Carson's words are historically accurate. It cannot be denied that gun control facilitated the disarming of political opponents and Jews in Nazi Germany and helped Hitler accomplish his horrific goals.  As for those who would register and disarm American citizens today, the history of Nazi Germany teaches a lesson that should never be forgotten.
Hijrah is the Islamic doctrine of migration, which is a form of stealth jihad.  “To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act,” Spencer wrote. He cited the following Quranic text:  “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Quran. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful” (Quran 4:100).  And now, looking at Europe and America, a migration invasion of a much greater magnitude is underway.  Evidence of that invasion came in February when an ISIS operative confirmed what many already suspected – the Islamic State is using the refugee crisis to form a fifth column of Muslim fighters inside Western nations.   FBI counter-terrorism expert Michael Steinbach told Congress in February it has no reliable way of vetting the Syrian refugees and FBI Director James Comey told Congress the agency already has its hands full with active ISIS investigations in all 50 states.  Yet the call for the U.S. to take more Syrian refugees has been incessant since last year, with the most public demands coming from Miliband’s organization as well as from the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which started out as a rescue mission for persecuted Jews but now relocates mostly Muslims to the U.S.  The Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service issued an alert to its supporters this week asking them to pressure the Obama administration to increase the number of foreign refugees accepted into the U.S. from 70,000 in 2015 to 200,000 in 2016. LIRS wants Obama to bring in 100,000 from Syria alone.  Like the IRC and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the Lutheran group gets paid by the federal government to resettle refugees in U.S. cities and towns.
Major media outlets such as the BBC, CNN and NBC continue to paint the crisis as a spontaneous event caused by people “fleeing conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan,” as the BBC reported. But those conflicts have been going on for years and the war-refugee narrative was refuted by a former Egyptian military officer in an interview with WND earlier this week.  The surge at Croatia’s border started after Hungary closed off its border three days ago.   HR 3314 or the Refugee Accountability National Security Act!   The refugee crisis was caused largely by Obama’s (Biden, Hillary, Kerry—Democraps all) own inept foreign policy, Babin told Breitbart.  "He drew red lines in the sand [that were] routinely crossed, never did a thing. He pulled everybody out of Iraq against the good advice of his own commanders,” he continued. "He did not force issues with the prime minister of Iraq, nor did he in Afghanistan. I think he can only look in the mirror and say, 'Hey this is my creation.'"  Aside from the costs of the program – at least $1 billion a year not including the cost of welfare benefits used by the refugees – Babin and McCaul have both been sounding the alarm that ISIS will exploit the refugee program to infiltrate the U.S. ISIS operatives have themselves promised to do exactly that, just as they have in Europe.  "We are crazy to be inviting the problems of the Middle East into the United States," Babin said.  According to the U.N.'s own data,  at least 71 percent of the migrants flooding Europe are military-aged men 20-30 years old.  See map below of the growing number of mosques built across the U.S., a majority of them financed with money from Saudi Arabia, a Muslim-only country that allows no churches within its borders and which has accepted zero refugees from Syria  "We are over 18 trillion dollars in debt. We don’t even have money to fix roads and schools for Americans who pay taxes and already live here.
(Just say NO)  “Apparently they’re scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America as part of our tradition of compassion,” Obama said. “At first they were worried about the press being too tough on ‘em during debates. Now they’re worried about three-year-old orphans. (NO,  BS’r in Chief OweDumbo, we are better safe than sorry worried about American lives and national security esp. military age refuges both males and female that we can NOT vet.  So smart OweDumbo, Biden and Hillary risk our lives and our country…
(Just say NO)  At least 66 men and women linked with ISIS-related terror plots on American soil have been arrested and charged with crimes, the Daily Mail reported Wednesday. 
The Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis is sometimes called "Little Mogadishu." It's center of the nation's largest concentration of Somalis, and fertile ground for Islamic terrorist groups recruiting new fighters.  But as many as 40 other young men from Minneapolis have joined Islamic fighters after they were pulled in by jihadists through social media.  "They're using twitter, they're using Facebook, they're using any means available to get in a computer system," Jamal said.
While Barack Hussein Obama claims that Republicans are fearful of Syrian widows and three-year-old orphans coming to the U.S. as “refugees,” Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) has published a partial list of Muslim “refugees” who have already tried to kill Americans since 2013. These aren’t widows or orphaned toddlers. They’re stone-cold adult male killers:
A former Al Qaeda operative who later became a mole for the CIA, appeared on “The Kelly File” last night to discuss the Paris terrorist attack and the inherently violent nature of Islam from its inception in the mind of the ruthless military leader Mohammad.
He read directly from the Quran and from the Hadith, the sayings of Mohammad to show that Islam preaches violence against the “infidel.”—meaning you and your loved ones.
The hacking group Anonymous is a nightmare for extremists. The mysterious group of hacking activists, whose members wear trademark Guy Fawkes masks, have targeted everyone from the Ku Klux Klan to the Church of Scientology. Now, they’re turning on the terrorists of the Islamic State group.  Stopping their propaganda is an effective way to weaken their manpower and their presence in the Internet. Disrupting their communications makes it difficult to organise their attacks in a fluid manner,” he explained.

Trump said. “And they look like young men, and strong men, and they look like fighters.”  Trump said he wondered “why aren’t they fighting for their own country — Syria?”  Trump warned that accepting refugees in our attempt at humanitarianism could be like accepting “a Trojan horse.” Many migrants, including Islamic militants, would come to an unprepared United States.  He further pointed out that the United States is a “debtor nation” that owes $19 trillion, and our infrastructure is outdated.  “Obama wants to bring 200,000 people here,” Trump said. “[I]f I win the election, they are going back. They’re going back.”  Under a Trump administration, instead of transferring these migrants to European countries or the U.S., “free zones, safe zones” would be set up in Syria for these people.  Trump pointed out that the Persian Gulf states aren’t “accepting anybody.”
"We need to reform entitlement programs, and my Republican colleagues have put forward many excellent free-market reform ideas — ideas that have been shamefully and dishonestly attacked by do-nothing Democrats for political gains.  "Still, our first priority must be to grow the economy. Once we've done that, entitlement reform will be much easier to achieve."  Instead, Trump is trotting out the same bogus charges that Democrats have been making for years: Republicans want to destroy Medicare, take away Social Security benefits, etc. Worse, by giving Democrats still more ammunition, Trump is poisoning the well for any entitlement reform, no matter who gets the nomination.   These programs are headed toward bankruptcy, and conservatives are the only ones who have had the guts to forward credible ideas to fix them that don't involve massive tax hikes.  Ryan's Medicare reform plan would expand seniors' choice of private insurance and save taxpayers money. Block grants for Medicaid are the only credible way to fix what is today an unmitigated budget and health care disaster. Social Security privatization is about improving retirement benefits for future workers by letting them invest in the private sector.  This isn't the first time Trump has strayed off the conservative fairway. In fact, the left-wing Think Progress lauded Trump in a recent story titled "The Surprisingly Strong Progressive Case for Donald Trump."  Right-wingers used to have a name for politicians who pretended to be conservative to win votes — they called them RINOs, as in "Republicans In Name Only."

Judicial Watch reports it has obtained FBI documents that show family members of top White House adviser Valerie Jarrett were "hardcore Communists" investigated by the government.  According to the report, Jarrett's father, pathologist and geneticist Dr. James Bowman, had a lengthy FBI file showing extensive ties to Communist organizations and individuals. One of those was the Communist-sympathizing group Association of Internes and Medical Students.   Jarrett, who has been called President Barack Obama's closest adviser, still has connections to many communist and extremist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, according to Judicial Watch.  "Jarrett and her family also had strong ties to Frank Marshal Davis, a big Obama mentor and Communist Party member with an extensive FBI file," the group says on its website.
Obama is an “amateur,” a “Marxist” and the “worst” president ever, charged a federal official responsible for protecting public health.   Judicial Watch said the emails were obtained as part of a review of the activation of a Centers for Disease Control Emergency Operations Center that was intended to “deal with the barrage of illegal alien minors” that arrived in the U.S. in 2014.
Some of the thousands of illegal alien youths have carried dangerous contagious diseases that had been considered eradicated in the U.S., such as swine flu, dengue fever, possibly the Ebola virus and tuberculosis.
“I do not remember this level of scrutiny for one President Barack Obama when he was running. In fact I remember just the opposite,” Carson said last Friday. “I remember people saying, ‘Oh, we won’t really talk about that. We won’t talk about that relationship. Well, Frank Marshall Davis, well, we don’t want to talk about that. Bernardine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, well he don’t really know him. All the things that Jeremiah Wright was saying, oh, not a big problem.'”   (where’s Owebummer’s long form original birth certificate, college transcripts & grades, passport and other records??)
What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist?” asks Matthews.  In the end, Wasserman Schultz is unwilling to offer an answer, only saying that the bigger issue is the difference between a Democrat and a Republican.  Matthews asked, “Do you want to see Bernie Sanders speak at the Democrat National Convention? Do you want to have him up there as a socialist representing the Democrat Party?  “Bernie Sanders has been a good Democrat. He caucuses with the Democrats. Of course he should speak,” she said.  You’re the chairman of the Democrat Party,” Matthews pressed. “Tell me the difference between you and a socialist.”
(Fundamental Transformation, Workers’ Paradise, Hope & Change)  a Paris-based group of historians has published the first global balance sheet of the "crimes, terror and repression" committed under communism.http://articles.latimes.com/images/pixel.gif   The harrowing arithmetic of the "Black Book of Communism": From the organized extermination of Soviet peasantry to the murderous upheavals of China's Great Cultural Revolution, from organized famine in Ukraine to repression in Fidel Castro's Cuba, communism has claimed 85 million to 100 million lives on four continents.  China has the tragic distinction of topping the list with as many as 72 million victims. In the Soviet Union, where the Communist Party ruled from 1917 until the state's collapse six years ago this December, an estimated 20 million perished in purges, famines, mass deportations and the labor camps of the Gulag, the new report says.  But it is the small Asian nation of Cambodia where the suffering and loss were the most intense. In 3 1/2 years, dictator Pol Pot, through the use of mass deportations, famine and forced labor, killed off as many as 2.3 million of his countrymen, or up to one-quarter of the population.
the hopeless "government-sponsored enterprises" Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose massive subsidizing of mortgages formed the roots of the 2008 financial crisis.  Similarly, government-controlled health care is a "marketplace" in Obama-speak.
Left-wing politicians redistributing private wealth is believing in the free market? Governmental bureaucrats, unlike entrepreneurs, don't care when money is wasted or stolen. In his anti-Stalinist novel "1984," George Orwell had the government feeding the people equally ridiculous lies: "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength." Oh yes, and socialism is entrepreneurialism.  In Orwell's fictional society, the populace were so systematically oppressed that they believed every lie, no matter how absurd.  The fact that Obama and Sanders think we'll so easily believe "socialized medicine is a marketplace" and that "wealth redistribution helps business" is a chilling commentary on how the free can be tricked into tyranny.

The Communist Manifesto has 10 things that if you accomplish all of them, you have succeeded in converting your society to socialism on the way to communism.  Graduated income tax is one of them.  Public education's another. 
“It’s kind of moot to get involved in the blame game,” he concluded, “because the reality of dealing with these people is paramount – and that’s where Obama is failing big time.”
“You have to go after the oil, and you have to do it in a serious way, and we’ve just begun to do that now,” he says. Yet even if the U.S. finally weakens the group’s oil income, Bahney and other analysts in the U.S., the Middle East, and Europe contend, Islamic State has resources beyond crude—from selling sex slaves to ransoming hostages to plundering stolen farmland—that can likely keep it fighting for years. In any case, $500 million buys a lot of $500 black-market AK-47s.  Beyond oil, the caliphate is believed by U.S. officials to have assets including $500 million to $1 billion that it seized from Iraqi bank branches last year, untold “hundreds of millions” of dollars that U.S. officials say are extorted and taxed out of populations under the group’s control, and tens of millions of dollars more earned from looted antiquities and ransoms paid to free kidnap victims.  The taxes bring in real money.  Arguably the least appreciated resource for Islamic State is its fertile farms. Before even starting the engine of a single tractor, the group is believed to have grabbed as much as $200 million in wheat from Iraqi silos alone.

Lopez became a key figure in the same-sex marriage debate when he shared his personal story of the devastating effects of growing up in a lesbian home in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court. Since then, Lopez believes, liberal activists have had their knives out for him. Whether that spurred this complaint or not, no one knows. Regardless, the California State University at Northridge launched an investigation, with Lopez’s tenure on the line.  In a controversy that’s dragged on for more than a year, school officials recently changed the charges from “discrimination” to “creating a hostile learning environment.” Despite the fact that the young woman received an “A” in Lopez’s class, and despite the fact that the professor has provided plenty of documents disputing her claims, the issue still isn’t settled. “Under these circumstances, we have no choice,” said his counsel at the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, “but to conclude that the disposition of this investigation is a purely political and ideological attack on Dr. Lopez for holding -- and exposing his students to -- ideas about children’s rights which are apparently unpopular.”  As far as Lopez is concerned, his case is just a symptom of a bigger problem. The modern American university has become a taxpayer-subsidized left-wing gulag,he wrote in an op-ed. “In it, dissenters such as myself can be subjected to Stalinist show trials, spied on, and threatened with loss of livelihood for espousing dangerous ideas or associating with political pariahs.” Make no mistake, he went on. “The diversity fascists are coming to get you.
(if you want to become more like Socialist Greece vote Democrap)  Author and former politician Upton Sinclair sure thought at least democrats were that gullible. In 1951, referring to his own experience running for public office after switching from the Socialist Party to the Democrat Party he said, "The American people will take socialism, but they won't take the label. I certainly proved it... Running on the Socialist ticket I got 60,000 votes, and running on the slogan to 'End Poverty in California' I got 879,000." Sinclair tricked 819,000 people, err, democrats into voting for him simply by switching labels and tweaking his message.   If Obama inherited the Great Recession, then Reagan inherited the Great-Great Recession with higher unemployment, inflation and interest rates. Reaganomics rocked the economy while Obama's economy's on the rocks.   There is no difference (between Democraps & Socialists) except that most self-declared socialists are honest enough to admit it.
Does our nation still hold these truths? Are we still a free people?  When Jefferson drafted those words two hundred thirty-nine years ago, he struck out the word Subjects and inserted the word Citizens. It was the first time Americans saw themselves as Citizens. Citizens govern themselves. Subjects must obey mandates. From arrogant bureaucrats. From unelected renegade judges.  How should we view the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? How do they complement one another? Lincoln provided an answer. "A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures [frames] of silver," he noted. He drew from Scripture. (Proverbs 25:11).  The Declaration of Independence is our apple of gold. The Constitution is its frame. Torn asunder, neither can long endure.
As a candidate, Bevin vowed to fight Obama’s Clean Power Plan, which requires curbs on greenhouse gas emissions from Kentucky’s coal-rich energy sector. He promised to “not enforce” any federal rules that would hurt Kentucky’s economy.
In his campaign platform, Bevin also vowed to use his office’s “constitutional right to legal discretion when enforcing environmental laws. This may include instructing its regulatory enforcement agencies to ignore federal regulations that are unreasonable and excessive.”
(Obama-Biden-Hillary-Kerry/Democrap same old failed policies)  Obama's economic recovery — already the worst since World War II — was even worse than previously thought. This isn't slow and steady growth, it's punishingly slow.  It also means that President Obama has presided over an economic recovery — now more than six years old — that is far worse than all the previous 10 stretching back 70 years.  Even President Bush's recovery from the 2001 recession — widely derided by Democrats and the press for being far too tepid — was stronger that Obama's. After 24 quarters, Obama's GDP is up a mere 13.3%. By this point in the Bush recovery, GDP had grown 18%.  Looked at another way, if Obama's recovery had been merely average — that is, if it had kept pace with the average of the previous 10 — the nation's economy would be $2.07 trillion bigger.  That works out to more than $17,000 in lost wealth per household thanks to Obama's subpar growth.  When confronted with such dismal results, the Obama administration and its defenders will blame the recession, claiming that recoveries from fiscal crises are always slower. Leave aside the fact that multiple studies have debunked this claim — as the charts below show — Obama's recovery has vastly underperformed even his own projections.   Millions have given up looking for work and dropped out of the labor force entirely. And millions more are in poverty and on food stamps than at the start of Obama's recovery.
TAXPAYER:  The Wall Street Journal analyzed the policy proposals that Sanders has put forward -- which includes single-payer health care, “free” college tuition, and an expansion of Social Security. The cost of these policies, according to the Journal, comes in at an eye-popping $18 trillion over ten years.    All one needs to do is look at Greece to see the ramifications of these aweful socialist policies.  As Margaret Thatcher once said, "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." Sanders' agenda is a perfect illustration of this.
You'll howl! Michael Savage channels Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders has been nailed! His voice ... his unapologetically socialist prescriptions for America ... his utter lack of experience to be president of the United States. This is so funny, you'll want Sanders to stay in the race just to hear the next parody ... Read the latest now on WND.com.

Many people know that America is $18 trillion in debt, but few know that this only captures a small portion of the total fiscal burden. When future spending obligations on health and retirement programs, such as Social Security and Medicare, are compared with future tax obligations, the so-called fiscal gap is $210 trillion. This is 12 times GDP and 16 times official debt held by the public. Past laws and current inaction by policymakers have placed a substantial fiscal burden on young Americans who never voted for these health and retirement programs.
More Fundamental Transformation:  a fantastic interview with Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness, and she blasted the Obama Administration, starting with Navy Secretary Mabus, for hurting our military effectiveness with social experimentation.  Watch!  Dr. Chaps' exclusive interview with Elaine Donnelly on women in combat and "transgender" cross-dressers in uniform-->  "After four years of comprehensive Marine Corps research, results clearly show that the case for women in direct ground combat still has not been made.  In fact, tests have produced highly credible, reality-based, empirical data that discredits theories about gender equality in the combat arms," writes Elaine.  In head-to-head competition, all male infantry units out-performed mixed gender units in 93 of 134 ground combat tasks.

In reality, Obama is quite possibly one of the biggest liars our nation has ever suffered in the White House.  Thankfully, somebody was kind enough to compile a list of some of the biggest whoppers Obama has told over the past seven years:  If you think this list of lies from Obama is bad, check out the Young Conservatives and their entire list of 68 documented falsehoods (lies & more lies) from our less-than-honest chief executive.
(moving on up the ladder)  One of the biggest problems in analyzing poverty is the vision that the poor are permanently poor. A University of Michigan study followed specific working Americans from 1975 to 1991. It found that particular individuals who were in the bottom 20 percent in terms of income saw their real incomes rise at a much higher rate than those in the top 20 percent. An IRS study, covering the period from 1996 to 2005, found a similar result. Workers whose incomes were in the bottom 20 percent saw their incomes rise by 91 percent. Over the same span, those in the top 1 percent saw their incomes fall by 26 percent. The outcomes of both studies give lie to the claim that "the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer."  "Wealth, Poverty and Politics: An International Perspective" is a true gem in terms of exposing the demagoguery and sheer ignorance of politicians and intellectuals in their claims about wealth and poverty. Sowell discusses a number of factors that help explain wealth and income differences among people and nations around the world. They include geographical, cultural, social and political factors, which Sowell explains in individual chapters.  How many times have we been told that the rich are prospering at the expense of the poor? Sowell points out that most households in the bottom 20 percent in income have no one working. How can someone who isn't producing anything have something taken from him?   Poverty occurs automatically and has been mankind's standard fare throughout its entire history. It is high productivity and affluence that are rare in mankind's history and require an explanation. Government definitions of poverty make talking about income gaps and disparities meaningless. If everyone's income doubled or even tripled, poverty would certainly be reduced, but income gaps and disparities would widen.  Calls for raising income tax rates to make "the rich" pay their undefined "fair share" are an exercise in futility because income taxes do not touch wealth. Higher income taxes are a tax on people trying to accumulate wealth.
Cruz launched into the moderators about their debate questions.  "You know, let me say something at the outset. The questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why the American people don't trust the media."  Cruz added, "Contrast with the Democratic debate, where every fawning question from the media was, 'Which of you is more handsome and why?'"  The crowd laughed with amusement.  "Let me be clear. The men and women on this stage have more ideas, more experience, more common sense than every participant in the Democratic debate," Cruz said. "That debate reflected a debate between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. And nobody watching at home believed that any of the moderators had any intention of voting in a Republican primary.
"The government has lied to you and they have stolen from you," Christie told listeners. " They told you your money is in a trust fund . … Social Security is going to be insolvent in seven to eight years."  He said his plan will save $1 trillion. Noting that Hillary Clinton has proposed increasing Social Security taxes, he asked, "If somebody has stolen from you, are you going to give them more?"
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who had a stellar night, piled on during a debate over political action committees. "Democrats have the ultimate Super PAC. It's called the mainstream media."
Palin called Cruz, Donald Trump and Ben Carson the debate's winners, adding that some candidates should drop out of the race.

Some critics of the program, which includes the National Center for Policy Analysis, a non-profit, non-partisan policy think tank, say the limited investment structure of myRAs makes them virtually useless as a retirement savings vehicle.  The G Fund, the model for myRAs, returned less than .25 percent in 2014. In 2013, it was 1.89 percent. Since April of 1987, it has yielded 5.54 percent, according to the Thrift Savings Plan website.
On July 2, 1776, Congress voted to approve a complete separation from Great Britain. Two days afterwards – July 4th – the early draft of the Declaration of Independence was signed, albeit by only two individuals at that time: John Hancock, President of Congress, and Charles Thompson, Secretary of Congress. Four days later, on July 8, members of Congress took that document and read it aloud from the steps of Independence Hall, proclaiming it to the city of Philadelphia, after which the Liberty Bell was rung. The inscription around the top of that bell, Leviticus 25:10, was most appropriate for the occasion: “Proclaim liberty throughout the land and to all the inhabitants thereof.”   It is amazing that on the very day they approved the Declaration, Adams was already foreseeing that their actions would be celebrated by future generations. Adams contemplated whether it would be proper to hold such celebrations, but then concluded that the day should be commemorated – but in a particular manner and with a specific spirit. As he told Abigail: “It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.”
Many sheriffs are adding “In God We Trust” to their cars.  “There has been no better time than now to proudly display our national motto,” Sheriff Doug Rader of Stone County, Mo., told the Stone County Chronicle. “I’m very humbled at the amount of support behind it.”
The same party that kicked God out of their platform (Democrats) wants to kick Him out of U.S. insurance policies too. Everyone from Barry Lynn to Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) is deploying their troops to a new battlefield: the church. Already, congregations are trying to prepare themselves for the storms ahead -- with many, National Review points out, frantically calling insurance companies to see what kind of coverage they have if they're sued for not performing same-sex "weddings."  The answer is: not much. "Churches, like virtually every functioning corporation, protect against liability risks and the potentially ruinous costs of litigation through liability insurance.
Richardson, earlier this year, visited Kurdish strongholds in northern Iraq. The Kurds also control areas within Syria and the New York Times recently reported that the Kurds have made advances against ISIS in northern Syria, increasing their control of a strategic highway and cutting off a main supply route from Turkey. Many Christian men have fought alongside Kurdish militias.
“I can attest that not only do Christian churches exist there, but the Christians are treated well. Americans of all parties must ask themselves why the Obama administration has, up until this point, refused to adequately get behind the Kurds,” Richardson told WND.  “The U.S. has openly supported the Syrian rebels, despite the fact that it is well documented that many of these rebels have gone on to join al-Nusra or ISIS,” he said. “It is also well documented that many of the Syrian rebels have been brutal in their persecution of the Christians, and other non-Sunni minorities throughout the region.”   “Under Assad, Christians in other minority groups have lived with a relative freedom and security,” he said. “Why then has the Obama administration chosen to cast (the Assad regime) aside as the greatest evil in Syria above all others?”  No one is suggesting that Assad is an angel, Richardson said.  “But look at the nation of Libya, after Obama and Hillary Clinton decided to remove Gadhafi. Of course, no one will say that Gadhafi was an angel, but Libya under his control was 1,000 times more stable and secure than it is today, after the Obama administration effectively handed that nation over to Islamists. One would think that they would have learned their lesson, and taken a different approach in Syria.”

1) We cannot be great if we are broke, see http://www.usdebtclock.org/  or  http://usadebtclock.com/  2)  We need to cut our unaffordable, greedy, wasteful, fraud-filled, abusive, corrupt, incompetent Fed Gov't at least in half by privatizing what we can, moving to the States what we can and streamlining what little is left through a Convention of States to save our liberty & our country by enacting the Liberty Amendments, which include term limits and a balanced budget, see http://www.conventionofstates.com/3)  Please vote for Ben Carson or Ted Cruz for President! https://www.bencarson.com/issues               https://www.tedcruz.org/         https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates 4)  The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_45.html   5) The IRS must be abolished & replaced by the FAIR tax that should go through the states as it did before the 16th Amendment, see http://fairtax.org/, plus the EPA along with most other Fed agencies need to be moved down to the state level. 6) Also, all the RHINOs like Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell etc. & all the Democraps, who bankrupt our country financially & morally, need to be primaried/voted out and replaced ASAP; get informed at https://www.conservativereview.com/7)  We need Affordable Gun Ownership with Concealed Carry & defense training for law abiding citizens, see http://www.gunowners.org/ or http://guntalk.com/site30.php  8)  Finally, we need to get back to personal responsibility, self-sufficiency, gratitude and God’s way, see  https://outreachjudaism.org/category/articles/page/2/ .          





Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 (NIV)  13 Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter:  Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the duty of all mankind.  14 For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil.


Deuteronomy 13:1-5 (NIV)  Worshiping Other Gods  13 [a]If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a sign or wonder, and if the sign or wonder spoken of takes place, and the prophet says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The Lord your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. It is the Lord your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him.



Three committees in the House of Representatives announced Friday that they were launching concurrent investigations into allegations that President Barack Obama deliberately manipulated intelligence reports from Syria and Iraq, allowing the Islamic State group to thrive.   Even Democrats have gotten on the president and the administration about the intelligence doctoring, including one of the ranking Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jackie Speier of California.  Do you think this deriliction of duty by Obama has helped the Islamic State group to thrive? Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know.  Demand Obama resign!



Obama has violated the Constitution and the Bill of Rights numerous times, making him the most criminal president in history. From waging illegal wars and committing war crimes to wantonly violating the Fourth Amendment and actively plotting against the Second Amendment, he continues to flaunt the rule of law and commit impeachable offenses. It is well past time for him to go.  Here is the petition. Please sign it.   Of course, we realize that it is unlikely Obama will be impeached and he will certainly never resign. We are posting the petition in order to draw attention to crimes glossed over and even ignored by the establishment media. It is an effort to draw attention to the fact Obama has violated his oath of Office, has attacked the Constitution and betrayed the American people.  Nixon resigned and Bill Clinton was impeached for less egregious offenses. It is our duty to enumerate Obama’s crimes and call for his removal from office.






'Your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole': Parents of SEAL Team Six soldier killed in action call for President Obama's resignation in searing open letter about his handling of ISIS










(Listen to the Great one’s podcast!)  Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas is making the Convention of States a legislative priority. Part of Abbott’s agenda includes, prohibiting Congress from regulating activity that occurs in only one state, requiring Congress to balance its budget, and prohibit Administrative agencies from creating federal law. All of it is true because the framers put it in the Constitution as a fire alarm should Americans need to harness an out of control government. Later, the NRA seeks to protect the 2nd amendment and educates people on firearms, so why does President Obama hate them? What’s worse, being a member of an organization that encourages responsible gun ownership or a member of the Democrat Party, which is destroying America?



Is it better to have the Constitution amended de facto by a 5-to-4 vote of the Supreme Court? By the unilateral actions of a president? By administrative rulings by anonymous bureaucrats in federal agencies, to whom federal judges "defer"?
Despite the left's portrayal of themselves as champions of the people, they consistently try to move decisions out of the hands of the general public and into the hands of officials insulated from the voters, such as unelected federal judges and anonymous bureaucrats with iron-clad job protection.

FIVER--ARTICLE V--CONVENTION OF STATES!!!!  On Friday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbot not only joined that movement, but he proposed a specific list of changes immediately that he says should be made.    A group called Convention of States, a project of the Citizens for Self-Government, already has been working on getting the necessary states to agree to such a convention.   The Convention of States website explains that the Founders provided the alternative, through which the states “can stop the federal spending and debt spree, the power grabs of the federal courts, and other misuses of federal power.”


Welcome to the Convention of States Store, your one-stop shop for apparel and promotional products to promote the Convention of States and get the word out!



https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates        is sending every candidate that has declared for the GOP nomination a survey to help conservatives understand where candidates stand on important issues.





2016 Presidential Hopefuls   

Worker-Protection Immigration Grade Cards

Assessing immigration stances that affect Americans' jobs & wages by changing supply of workers.



"We've got a big credit card bill, folks, because of the Owebama Democrats and we gotta pay it back." 




On Monday the U.S. national debt hit a new record: $19,012,827,698,418. This is the first time the national debt has ever exceeded $19 trillion. That’s more than $58,000 for each person who lives in the U.S. today (including children).  That’s more than $58,000 for each person that lives in the U.S. today (including children).  The main culprit behind the rising deficits and debt is growing federal spending—especially among Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.  Default should never be an option. The Department of Treasury can prioritize debt obligations at the debt limit and, Congress would just as soon grant Treasury Department additional flexibility at the debt limit to borrow for the purpose of preserving the full faith and credit of the United States of America.  Congress should reform entitlement programs and put the budget on a path to balance, before increasing the debt limit again.


The Treasury Department takes charge -- especially VISA and MasterCard! Those are just two ways the U.S. government is accepting donations to pay down the $19,012,827,698,400 debt it owes as of February 1. (If you think that number's scary, wait until you see the interest!) Last year, Americans gave more than $3 million to the effort, which is just a drop in the IOU bucket at the rate Congress is spending.  Now, in historic borrowing trouble, the U.S. will need a lot more than people's charity to steer the country away from insolvency. Unfortunately, the crisis doesn't seem to faze President Obama, who's setting records (and not the good kind) by presiding over the single greatest debt increase in U.S. history. Remember when Barack Obama said it was "unpatriotic" and "irresponsible" for his predecessor to add $4 trillion to the national debt? Well, I wonder what it's called when you add double that with a year to go? And here's the kicker: the White House's latest budget proposal would dig the hole $8 trillion deeper over the next 10 years if it passed (which, thank goodness, it never will). House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) could only shake his head. "President Obama will leave office having never proposed a budget that balances -- ever."


Jesse Patton, an insurance broker living in Iowa, has had clients with net worths ranging from $2 million to $5 million, which often stem from farmland or assets from divorce settlements. And those clients, he said, are enrolled in Medicaid in expansion states like Iowa.   “It was designed to help the lower-income population,” Patton told The Daily Signal of Medicaid. “But without the asset test, there are folks that have the financial means and assets there that are good at figuring out how to work the system and capture a benefit they’re entitled to.”  Under the Affordable Care Act, states that opted to expand Medicaid did away with an asset test, which was previously used to determine eligibility in regular Medicaid.



Obama Lied, And The Debt Ceiling Died

But even as Lew was telling the senators this, the New York Fed was working out contingency plans to do just what Lew said was impossible make sure that creditors, retirees, the military and other priorities were paid before anyone else.

What’s more, Treasury had decided to prioritize payments as early as Sept. 17 — almost a month before Lew said it was impossible — if the debt limit fight wasn’t resolved in time. And it was telling the New York Fed that any delays in principle or interest payments on the debt “will never happen.”  All this has finally come to light, thanks to two years of investigation work by the House Financial Services oversight subcommittee.  A scathing staff report released on Monday concludes that the Obama administration purposely withheld its contingency plans from the public to gain leverage over Republicans. And that it “appears to have actively obstructed the committee’s investigation in the administration’s debt ceiling contingency plans.”  The committee unearthed documents showing that the staffers at the New York Fed and the Federal Reserve wanted Treasury to reveal these plans at the time to calm jittery markets and that Treasury’s refusal to do so was, as one put it, “crazy, counterproductive, and added risk to an already risky situation.”


Dr. King wrote his famous "Letter from the Birmingham Jail" to seven clergymen and one rabbi. 

http://abacus.bates.edu/admin/offices/dos/mlk/letter.html  Dr. King wrote:   "You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws…. One may well ask: 'How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?' The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."  "Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law."  our battles today are many: Forced participation in genocide through abortion funding violates both the revealed and Natural Law. Laws that deconstruct God's natural created order of marriage as being between male and female, and laws that force affirmation or promotion of sexual immorality, are unjust laws. The dismantling of our First and Second Amendment rights are both unconstitutional and unjust.

How you can defeat the mainstream media:  Please support WND. We believe WND is the kind of news organization America's founders would have approved. We don't mock patriotic Americans and tea partiers trying to set their country right. We don't rewrite White House press releases and call it news. We don't bow and scrape before President Obama or anyone else. We don't pretend abortion is OK, or that same-sex marriage is good, or that global warming is "proven science," or that more government is the solution to all problems, or that Palestinian leaders want peace, or that the Constitution is old-fashioned, or that the "Federal Reserve" is good for America. In short, we're not politically correct and we have no sacred cows. Instead, our team of experienced, professional journalists strives to do one thing – to tell the truth that Americans desperately need and deserve to hear. •  Simply choose the amount you would like to donate for your voluntary subscription payment by using the "Amount" drop-down menu. Then select the frequency of your donation from the "Frequency" drop-down menu – either monthly or a one-time donation. If you wish to donate monthly, the amount you select will be deducted from your credit card on or around the first day of each month. (Just call or e-mail WND if you ever want to cancel or change the amount.)  •  You may also donate to WND's Legal Defense Fund, to help us battle the lawsuits and threats that always accompany honest journalism. As yet another alternative, you may send a check to WND.com, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, OR 97501. (Be sure to mark your check "voluntary subscription payment" or "legal defense fund.")   Finally, if you prefer, you may donate by calling our toll-free order line: 1-800-4-WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).  Thank you very much. All of us at WND deeply appreciate your support. It's truly what enables us to keep going. And I think you'll agree, with everything going on in America today, we need a vibrant, free press more than ever.

For more than a decade, I’ve been accusing the public system in America of brainwashing our kids into rejecting everything that made America great and embracing socialism.  He also noted that 18-26 year olds get most of their news via social media where there is no accountability and anyone can say anything they want about a candidate and then the comments go away. Luntz refers to them as the Snapchat generation that are listening to tons of inaccuracies and believing what they are seeing on social media instead of finding out the truth via the real world.







(Power of the Purse/defunding, Impeachment..)  Republican Rep. Steven Palazzo of Mississippi has an idea for pushing back: He is asking his colleagues in Congress to officially censure Obama for his unconstitutional actions, according to Breitbart.  He followed up his call for the censure of Obama with a press release to his congressional website, explaining why Obama must be censured and noting that there was precedent for such an action.  “‘The House Resolution to Censure Barack Obama’ would specifically censure and condemn the actions of President Obama regarding his announced actions on gun control this week,” Palazzo explained, noting that Obama has not only exceeded his authority regarding gun control, but also on immigration, so-called climate change, and the Iranian nuclear deal, among many other things.  He also noted that while Obama calls for new laws, he has been ignoring and not enforcing laws that are already on the books, again not simply with gun control, but also with immigration and Obamacare.  Palazzo continued on by laying out the precedent for a censure of the president, explaining how the Senate censured President Andrew Jackson in 1834 for unilaterally dismantling the Bank of the United States. He also pointed out that censure resolutions were introduced against both President Nixon and Clinton, though those resolutions were never officially adopted.  Unfortunately, thanks to the manner in which the Congress has been run for the past several years, they have virtually boxed themselves in and limited themselves in what they can do to push back against Obama.


Though Congress has given up much of its power when it comes to using its “power of the purse” to (defund) stop executive overreach, (impeachment too)  there is one power it still holds, and there is absolutely no reason not to use it. Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, popularly known as “Advise and Consent,” requires the Senate to approve all presidential appointments of cabinet officials, ambassadors, and federal judges.  Refusing to confirm any more of the president’s judicial nominees is something Senate Republicans can do immediately. No filibuster by Minority Leader Harry Reid or veto by Obama can stop them.


(Spineless RHINOs) Obama continued to reshape the federal judiciary Wednesday with the confirmation of another judge to a lifetime appointment. He is the third this month approved by the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate.  John Michael Vazquez won confirmation late Wednesday on a vote of 84-2 to be a U.S. district judge in New Jersey. Vazquez had the backing of New Jersey’s two Democrat senators, Robert Menendez and Cory Booker.  Two Republicans opposed Vazquez’s confirmation: Sens. James Lankford of Oklahoma and Dan Sullivan of Alaska. Fourteen senators missed the vote on the chamber’s first day back after last week’s blizzard.



There is a simple reason we never read about jihadi attacks in Japan. There are no Muslims there. No Muslims, no terrorists. 

Muslim immigration is officially and culturally discouraged, and a Japanese woman who marries a Muslim man becomes a social outcast.   Islamic proselytization is forbidden in Japan, it is very difficult to import Qur’ans into the country, and there are very few mosques. In Japan, Muslim men are expected to pray at home, not in mosques or in the middle of the street as they do in France. Islamic organizations are not allowed, so the Japanese do not have to deal with the incessant stream of propaganda coming from pro-jihadi groups like CAIR. There is only one imam in Tokyo, a city of over 13 million people.   Virtually the only Muslims who are in Japan come as employees of foreign companies. And even that is the exception rather than the rule. “The official policy of the Japanese authorities is to make every effort not to allow entry to Muslims, even if they are physicians, engineers and managers sent by foreign companies that are active in the region.”   The Japanese have a patriotic pride in Japanese exceptionalism, Japanese culture and Japanese traditions, and instinctively recognize that enculturating Islam threatens all that because its value system is so antithetical to what makes Japan Japan. Concluded Dr. Kedar, “Japan is teaching the whole world an interesting lesson: there is a direct correlation between national heritage and permission to immigrate: a people that has a solid and clear national heritage and identity will not allow the unemployed of the world to enter its country; and a people whose cultural heritage and national identity is weak and fragile, has no defense mechanisms to prevent a foreign culture from penetrating into its country and its land.”   Taking humble and grateful pride once again in what God has done to make America the most exceptional nation in history is not only the right thing to do, it is the safest thing to do.



He then pointed the finger of blame at both President Barack Obama and his former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, for the rise of ISIS.  "They have a bunch of dishonest people," he said, Business Insider reports. "They've created ISIS. Hillary Clinton created ISIS with Obama — created with Obama."

Obama went on television the night of Feb. 1 and said the transition “must begin now.” With that, the die was cast: The Muslim Brotherhood, the strongest opposition force in Egypt, had been late to join the uprising but now moved to take advantage of it. Clinton and Wisner continued to urge caution, but Obama chided them for sending “mixed messages” that undercut the White House line. The Tahrir protests escalated, the army refused to intervene, and Mubarak resigned on Feb. 11.  The coup in the streets led to the election of President Mohamed Morsi; his abuses triggered a counter-coup by the Egyptian military. Emboldened by events in Egypt, Muslim revolutionaries (with U.S. help-Obama, Hillary & Democraps) toppled a dictator in Libya and are still trying to overthrow one in Syria. And the rulers of Saudi Arabia are still traumatized by America’s abandonment of Mubarak. (Horrible Iran nuke deal too) &  (YES, this is the failed Democrap interventionist foreign policies that give us things like 9/11…)



Republican presidential hopeful Ted Cruz appeared on Fox News to usher in 2016 Thursday night — and he did so by slamming President Barack Obama and Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton. “2016 is going to be an incredible year,” the Texas senator proclaimed. “2016 is going to be the last year of the Obama presidency. 2016 is going to be the last year before Hillary retires permanently to Chappaqua.” Cruz added, “2016 is going to be the last year that we have Obamacare. 2016 is going to be the last year until we abolish the IRS. And 2016 is going to be the last year until we utterly destroy ISIS and defeat radical Islamic terrorism. Like 1980, 2016 is going to be a very, very good year.” The presidential candidate, who has gained traction in recent weeks, ended his New Year’s Eve message by telling a story he said he’s “heard on the trail,” watch it above.



Imagine if you had to get your house from your employer? Would the housing market serve your needs? when the insurance company is terminating a policy because of non-payment of premium a notice should go to the State so they could decide to pay the premium instead of the medical bills with someone with cancer. (there should be an easy way for family, friends, community etc to be charitable to help pay insurance too)


A new report says that Iran recently tested another mid-range ballistic missile, breaching United Nations restrictions. This is the same country that President Obama imagines is going to obey his nuclear agreements.  Fox News reported that Iran tested a medium range ballistic missile despite two separate U.N. resolutions supposedly prohibiting them from carrying out such tests.  The missile that was tested is known as the Ghadr-110. The Missile has a range of 1,200 miles and is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

(weakness encourages aggression vs. peace through strength & clarity)  Recall that in October, Iran test-fired a nuclear-capable ballistic missile in brazen violation of Security Council resolutions prohibiting such launches. President Obama did nothing.  One month later, Iran did it again. The administration made a few gestures at the U.N. Then nothing.  Just two weeks ago, Iran's Revolutionary Guards conducted live-fire exercises near the Strait of Hormuz. It gave nearby U.S. vessels exactly 23 seconds of warning. One rocket was launched 1,500 yards from the USS Harry S. Truman.  Obama's response? None.  The Gulf Arabs — rich, weak and, since FDR, dependent on America for security — are bewildered. If anything, Obama's openhanded appeasement has encouraged Iran's regional adventurism and intense anti-Americanism.   The Saudis feel surrounded, and it's not paranoia. To their north, Iran dominates a Shiite crescent stretching from Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to the Mediterranean. To the Saudi south, Iran has been arming Yemen's Houthi rebels since at least 2009.  The danger is rising. For years, Iran has been supporting anti-regime agitation among Saudi Arabia's minority Shiites. The Persian Gulf is Iran's ultimate prize. The fall of the House of Saud would make Iran the undisputed regional hegemon and an emerging global power.  For the U.S., that would be the greatest geopolitical setback since China fell to communism in 1949 (Democrap Truman). Yet Obama seems oblivious. There is no price for defying Pax Americana — not even trivial sanctions on Iranian missile-enablers. Our enemies know it. Our allies see it


From the president who brought you Benghazi ... Benghazi 2!

Obama's 2011 Libyan military adventure is the gift that keeps on giving: Weapons flooding into Syria, the rise of ISIS, thousands of refugees fleeing across the Mediterranean weekly into Italy, chaos in Tripoli, four dead Americans in Benghazi. Now he wants to to do it all again.   Can these outspoken generals keep Obama from committing another "trillion-dollar failure"?

Read the latest now on WND.com.


Recall the CIA program that spent $500 million to train 60 rebels who promptly lost or surrendered on the battlefield. How would this bureaucratic failure be different if it were conducted in one of Rubio’s safe zones?  Unfortunately, this desire to go to war first and worry about a strategy and exit plan later are the hallmark of Rubio and the Republican foreign policy establishment led by Rubio-mentor John McCain.


The Roman philosopher and statesman Cicero insisted that
gratitude was "the parent of all the other virtues."   He was not referring to a pop socialism, where all supposedly owe their successes to the government.  Instead, gratitude is proof of humility and offers perspective. It is an appreciation for others, often now dead, who have helped to make us what we are. Without it, we are narcissists and self-absorbed amnesiacs.  Unfortunately, our modern "me" generation has forgotten gratitude and replaced it with the art of victimization. Contemporary Americans prefer blaming others — parents, ancestors, their country, the world in general — for their own unhappiness, while patting themselves on the back for anything that goes well.  Nowhere is the death of gratitude more acute than at our elite universities.  But could today's student activists on beatific campuses have survived a covered-wagon trip through the Utah desert, or a 19th-century Appalachian coal mine or a mission with a B-17 crew over Schweinfurt, Germany?   Too often, immigrants assume that America owes them rather than they owe America — sort of like an uninvited guest moving into the house of the host and berating him over the menu and accommodations.


Rewriting genes can cure people of terrible diseases, but it can also, as Clapper points out, give our adversaries a lethal way to terrorize the world. That's becoming an even greater possibility now with the breakthrough of the CRISPR, one of the simplest and most inexpensive ways to edit genes. "Easy to use," MIT's Technology Review explains, "Hard to control." With "do-it-yourself" kits as cheap as $700 ("includes everything you'll need to 'bend DNA to your will!') experts are worried that this science is the biggest menace no one knows about.  "Clapper didn't lay out any particular bioweapons scenarios," MIT explained, "but scientists have previously speculated about whether CRISPR could be used to make 'killer mosquitoes,' plagues that wipe out staple crops, or even a virus that snips at people's DNA."



Maine’s governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on recipients who are without dependents and able-bodied. In Maine, all able-bodied adults without dependents in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.  Job openings for lower-skill workers are abundant in Maine, and for those ABAWD recipients who cannot find immediate employment, Maine offers both training and community service slots. But despite vigorous outreach efforts by the government to encourage participation, most childless adult recipients in Maine refused to participate in training or even to perform community service for six hours per week. When ABAWD recipients refused to participate, their food stamp benefits ceased.  In the first three months after Maine’s work policy went into effect, its caseload of able-bodied adults without dependents plummeted by 80 percent, falling from 13,332 recipients in Dec. 2014 to 2,678 in March 2015.  This rapid drop in welfare dependence has a historical precedent: When work requirements were established in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in the 1990s, nationwide caseloads dropped by almost as much, albeit over a few years rather than a few monthsSTATE Government should aid those in need, but welfare should not be a one-way handout.  The Maine food stamp work requirement is sound public policy. Government should aid those in need, but welfare should not be a one-way handout.


Dr. Phil McGraw joined Megyn Kelly tonight on “The Kelly File” to discuss how our culture has created a generation of entitled, narcissistic, fame-obsessed individuals. “We do have a generation that, I think, we have raised with a great deal of entitlement,”  Dr. Phil said. “We’ve got to stop rewarding bad behavior in America. When people don’t work and produce, then they need to get kicked to the curb.” “Get a damn job. Carry your own weight.”



the reality is that the human race is not entitled to anything, not even the food we need to stay alive. If we don’t produce food, we are just going to starve. If we don’t build housing, then we are not going to have housing, “affordable” or otherwise.  Particular individuals or groups can be given many things, to which politicians say they are “entitled,” only if other people are forced by the government to provide those things to people who don’t need to lift a finger to earn them. All the fancy talk about “entitlement” means simply forcing some people to work to produce things for other people, who have no obligation to work.  It gets worse. If we are all “entitled” to things, irrespective of whether we produce anything ourselves, then the question becomes: Why are some people getting so much more than others?  People who are producing nothing can feel a sense of grievance against those who are producing much, and being rewarded for it, if our basis for receiving economic benefits is supposed to be what we are all “entitled” to, rather than what we have worked to earn.  One of the most misleading uses of the notion of entitlement is to say that people who paid into Social Security for years are now entitled to the pensions they receive.  Really? It so happens that I have put money into the same bank account for more than 20 years. But if I were to write a check for a million dollars today, it would bounce! The question is not how long you have been putting money in, but how much money you put in.  If what you have been putting into Social Security over the years is enough to pay you a $1,500 a month pension, but you were promised a $3,000 a month pension, how much are you entitled to? On what basis?  We can be both realistic enough, and decent enough, to rescue older people who have been victimized by political fantasies. We can pay higher taxes temporarily to rescue them. But, there is no reason to bankrupt the country by keeping the fraud going forever.  Younger people can be allowed to opt out and arrange their own pension plans in the private sector, where the kind of irresponsible pyramid schemes that politicians set up are illegal.  But we don’t need to ruin the whole economy, in order to preserve the illusions created by toxic words like “entitlement.”



We already have two: the Fifth and 14th Amendments. The Fifth Amendment says that you cannot deprive somebody of life or liberty unless there’s due process. The 14th Amendment says that states neither can do that, and they have to provide equal protection under the law.  “What it means is really simple: if the unborn child is a person, they’re already protected under the Fifth and 14th Amendments. It just requires a president who appoints an attorney general who will recognize the personhood of every person from conception forward and say, ‘We have a constitutional obligation to protect people.'”  The only question in the court becomes is the unborn child a person? I’m willing to have that battle in court because … bring the best biologists in the world, put them under oath and ask them when 23 chromosomes from a man and 23 from a woman merge at fertilization, is that a life?

Planned Parenthood is an organization that cares about one thing: making a profit at the expense of women’s health,” said ADF Legal Communications Director Kerri Kupec. “The investigative videos, whose authenticity was confirmed by the report, show that Planned Parenthood is an abortion machine whose top executives and doctors haggle and joke about the harvesting and selling of baby body parts. Women deserve far better. American taxpayer money should be redirected to fund local community health centers and not subsidize a scandal-ridden, billion-dollar abortion business.”



I know that Obama’s grand plan for populating the U.S. with “refugees” basically hostile to individual rights and the U.S. Constitution does not include admitting swarms of individuals who are true refugees from tyranny and poverty who seek the security of a civilized country governed by the rule of law and not of men. He prefers to bring in Muslims who come here as part of a “Grand Jihad” to conquer the country by settling in it.  The (Democrap) INS has been given its marching orders: block Middle Eastern Christians from entering the U.S., but put out the welcome mat for anyone who wants to reclaim Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico as Mexican provinces, or for anyone who adheres to Islam and expects the rest of the U.S. to abide by its rules, and who wouldn’t mind the Constitution being replaced with Sharia law.  Or, simply make life miserable and expensive for anyone who does not toe the Obama line on immigration. Punish them. Smear them. Bankrupt them. Silence them.


Poll Of U.S. Muslims Reveals Ominous Levels Of Support For Islamic Supremacists’ Doctrine of Shariah, Jihad


If people want to live in America -- including Muslims -- they need to embrace our Constitution and our culture. Others have said in less artful ways what conservatives have been warning for years: there is no such thing as coexistence between Sharia law and our constitutional republic. That isn't religious prejudice, but an ideological reality.  What most people either don't realize or willfully ignore is that only 16 percent of Islam is a religion -- the rest is a combination of military, judicial, economic, and political system.  The bottom line is this: the U.S. Constitution is an agreement between people about how they'll be governed. What good is it if people immigrate to America with the sole purpose of undermining that contract? We shouldn't be embarrassed to say that we oppose those who want to come to the United States to destroy it. And while most Muslims are not radicalized, Sharia certainly encourages it. Based on polling from the Center for Security Policy, that's the system most would choose.



A lot of moderate Muslims came here in the first place to get away from the crazies in their own religion; so why do we want to risk bringing those same crazies here by the thousands? Because of our inability to screen out radicals, we’d be better off doing anything and everything possible to cut back on the number of Muslims we allow to immigrate to our country.   In just 11 countries, there appears to be north of 60 million Muslims at a minimum who approve of an Islamic organization that’s every bit as evil as the Nazis.  Additionally, while it’s true that a relatively small number of Muslims are in favor of suicide bombing, those numbers can really add up. For example, 86% of American Muslims oppose suicide bombing. Should we be hailing those numbers even though it means roughly 460,000 American Muslims are okay with suicide bombing? Incidentally, the percentage of Muslims who are okay with suicide bombing goes up over the 25% mark in places like Afghanistan, Egypt, Bangladesh and the Palestinian territories. Ironically, most of the victims of these Muslims are other Muslims.  You can certainly argue that groups like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and Boko Haram are misinterpreting Islam or perverting the Koran, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are Muslims who believe they’re being faithful to their religion as they rape, murder, and enslave the innocent in the name of Allah.



“In 15 days we have seized one-third of the quantity of war-grade weapons that are normally seized in a year,” French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said.  Cazeneuve also said that three mosques had been closed down in the national state of emergency following the attacks. One of the mosques authorities shuttered on Wednesday after authorities discovered a 9mm handgun, a concealed hard drive, a life insurance policy and — most tellingly — documents relating to jihad.



the flood of Muslims into the United States under Barack Hussein Obama. This is an invasion of a potential Muslim army into America by the lawless, pro-Muslim occupier of the White House – a man who rules like a tyrant and who clearly despises his country.  Obama is inviting what amounts to a Muslim army into the United States. How many Americans will die because of Democraps’ pro-Islam policies?  A green card entitles recipients to access federal benefits, lifetime residency, work authorization, and a direct route to becoming a U.S. citizen.



The Egyptian Foreign Minister, Ahmed Aboul Gheit had a one-on-one meeting with Barack Hussein Obama.

In this meeting, Obama stated that,  “He was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the step son of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.”

50,000 Muslims enter Canada: U.S. border 'wide open'

As if the mayhem along our southern border with Mexico were not maddening enough. Now alarm bells are sounding loudly in the U.S. Congress, as 50,000 Syrian Muslims are entering Canada, and our northern border is said to be "wide open" ...

Read the latest now on WND.com.


That’s right, funny man Jackie Mason blames Democrats and Liberal Jews for the problems facing Israel today, and I think he’s 100% correct.



However, as Breitbart reports, the Government Accountability Institute has released studies showing that Obama has actually attended less than half of his Presidential Daily Briefs.  (he hears only what he wants to hear and spends his time lying, destroying America, golfing, campaigning and vacationing)  There is absolutely no doubt that many of Obama’s PDBs contained vital information regarding the rise and expansion of, as well as known threats and plots in the works by the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria.  The administration has laughably claimed that Obama doesn’t necessarily have to attend the daily briefings in person, as he receives the information on his iPad.  However, reading a few short summations on an iPad is not an acceptable replacement for personally hearing a detailed intelligence report, where one can engage in questions and answers.  President Obama blatantly lied during his prime-time speech, as he has attended less than half of the daily intelligence briefings he now claims to rely upon to take the threat of terrorism seriously.



Obama used to think it was appropriate for senators (including himself) to block judicial nominees. In fact, he filibustered Justice Samuel Alito’s confirmation to the Supreme Court along with circuit court nominees Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor, and Leslie Southwick.




Hope & Change:  The national debt was $10.6 trillion when Obama came into office in 2009. It now stands at $18.9 trillion—an astounding 80-percent increase in just seven years, the largest increase in history. Our government debt now eclipses the size of our economy.  What has all this spending, taxing, regulating, and new debt brought us? The slowest recovery since the Great Depression.   Many have fled the job market in favor of the callous arms of big government. Total means-tested welfare spending now stands at over $1 trillion annually—the highest ever even though the recession supposedly ended in 2010. Over 45 million people—one out of every seven Americans—receive food stamps, a remarkable 63 percent increase since the height of the recession in 2009.  (Food Stamp Prezzie. Read more on the website on foreign affairs etc…)


When Obama came into office, he would often publicly complain about CEOs being paid too much.  “What gets people upset — and rightfully so — are executives being rewarded for failure,” he said at press conference in early 2009.  Later he opined that “the compensation packages that we’ve seen over the last decade at least have not matched up always to performance.”

It’s a complaint Democrats have made repeatedly over the years, as though they have a better way than the free market to determine the right compensation package.  But what if we were to hold Obama — the nation’s chief executive — to his own standard?  CEO Obama set extremely modest goals for growth — well below the average of all the economic recoveries since World War II. In fact, had Obama’s economic recovery been merely average, GDP would be more than $2 trillion bigger than it is today.  And each time the economy underperformed, Obama pointed fingers, blaming everything from a tsunami, a cold winter, the Arab Spring, gas prices and budget cuts to George Bush.  All the while he’s ignored the harm that his own policies have done: ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, massive EPA regulations, new labor costs, higher taxes and a failed Keynesian stimulus. Absent those shackles, the economy would have almost certainly recovered from the deep recession fast and furiously.  And for this lousy performance, Obama gets a $400,000 salary (more than twice the average for all CEOs), roughly $1.5 million in annual pension benefits, free room and board, gourmet chefs, generous expense accounts and paid vacations. IBD’s Andrew Malcolm discovered that Obama’s vacations alone have cost taxpayers more than $70 million, so far.  Most CEOs could only dream of living so well. Does anyone think Obama’s compensation matches up to his performance?



It is Republicans who are promoting the kinds of ideas and policies needed to help low-income Americans move up the ladder. Republicans don’t favor the rich; they favor those who want to get rich.  Recently, Brookings Institution scholar Ron Haskins gave congressional testimony and summarized the major factors perpetuating poverty and limiting economic upward mobility: rising share of single-mother homes, high out-of-wedlock birth rates, growing gaps in education between rich and poor, and low work rates and stagnating wages among low-income men.  The evidence today is overwhelming regarding the central importance of the traditional family to economic success. It is Republicans who promote the importance of traditional values. It is the Democratic Party that sells openness to alternative lifestyles, abortion, re-defining marriage and big government programs that subsidize these kinds of destructive behaviors.  Regarding education, public schools in poor neighborhoods are a disaster. Republicans promote school choice and opportunities to empower parents to choose where to send their children to school. Democrats uniformly fight these efforts.  Regarding work, the minimum wage that Democrats so love is a job destroyer. Today’s anemic economy is the result of big government Democratic policiesIf “favoring the poor” means promoting policies that keep the poor poor, blacks are right. This is Democrats. But if favoring the poor means policies that maximize chances of getting out of poverty, these are Republican proposals.



Breitbart News story, August 6th of 2015.  "Marco Rubio says he wants border fence, visa tracking system, but voted against both to pass the Gang of Eight bill."  And then from the article it says this:  "When the Schumer-Rubio bill hit the Senate floor, Sen. John Thune offered an amendment to required the completion of a border fence. Sen. Rubio joined all members of the Gang in voting against Thune’s amendment, which failed.  "Likewise, with respect to the implementation exit-entry tracking system, Sen. Rubio voted against an amendment offered by Sen. Vitter (R-LA), which would require the implementation of exit-entry tracking system in order to prevent foreign nationals from illegally overstaying their visas."  This is all about this E-Verify system and the E-Verify card that would be handed out.  "Similarly, the Schumer-Rubio immigration bill did not require the immediate implementation e-verify." 


Trump and Rubio have recorded histories of lying or flip-flopping on a major issue: Amnesty.  All of this has led me to deeply distrust Marco Rubio×

. The question I ask myself is this: If he’ll lie about something as massive as amnesty, what won’t he lie about?  Trump is as bad, if not worse. As recently as 2012, Trump seemed to strongly support amnesty.


Yet, not only was Donald Trump’s belligerent voice absent in the fight, he echoed the very decrepit sentiments promulgated by the worst elements of the GOP establishment. This begs the question: Where the hell was Donald Trump’s aggressive voice and impervious persona when we needed him on this fight or any other political battle??  Isn’t it amazing how politically correct and establishmentarian Trump is when there is no personal political gain at stake?


Donald J. Trump's record on truth and accuracy is astonishingly poor," Angie Drobnic Holan, a reporter for PolitiFact, wrote in December in The New York Times. "So far, we've fact-checked more than 70 Trump statements and rated fully three-quarters of them as Mostly False, False or 'Pants on Fire' (we reserve this last designation for a claim that is not only inaccurate but also ridiculous)." Making stuff up is at the core of his campaign.  Of 96 Trump statements scrutinized by PolitiFact at last count, only seven were true. By contrast, Hillary Clinton, whom Republicans regard as a habitual liar, sticks to the facts slightly more than half the time, according to the fact-checkers.


If the public is to learn about Donald Trump, the man, there is a triad of documents that need be released immediately. First, Mr. Trump should release his federal and state tax income returns for 2012 and 2013. Second, Mr. Trump should release his college transcripts. Third, the public needs to understand how much money was lost by his investors and who those investors (direct and indirect) were in his four corporate bankruptcies.  Before his decision to run for the presidency, was he making significant cash contributions to charity..??

Michael Reagan: Trump Is No Reagan Republican

Ronald Reagan’s odyssey from Hollywood liberal to conservative backer took place over almost two decades.

Starting with his 1964 “Time for Choosing” speech that galvanized Americans for Barry Goldwater, Dad began a 16-year effort of crisscrossing America to support conservative candidates for office.  My dad also served eight years as California’s governor. When he ran for president, he had a proven conservative track record.  Donald Trump doesn’t have one. In fact, Trump still can’t explain his sudden change from being a liberal Democrat. When Dad ran in 1980, Trump donated the maximum amount to Jimmy Carter.  As the Wall Street Journal reported, Trump also donated to a PAC for Walter Mondale, who ran against Dad in 1984.Trump has criticized some candidates for their indiscretions made during their childhood.  But what can you say for a grown adult who supported both Carter and Mondale over Ronald Reagan?  One of my dad’s most important lessons to me was how to uncover a phony. He told me not to judge people by what they say; judge them by what they actually do. As president, Dad used this “trust but verify” principle on the Soviets and it worked.  Voters today should apply Reagan’s verify principle on Trump.  During the 2008 election, Trump told CNN that he wanted President George W. Bush impeached.  Then, during Obama’s first year in the White House, after he rammed through Congress a $800 billion stimulus and proposed a radical health care takeover, Trump praised the president, saying he was “amazing” and “truly phenomenal.”  Obama’s then chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a player in passing Obamacare. Rahm eventually left the White House to run for Chicago’s mayor. In 2010, Trump actually donated $50,000 to Rahm’s mayoral campaign!  Just last year Trump told “60 Minutes” he wants single-payer health care like they have in Canada and Britain. It’s nothing less than socialized medicine.  For most of his life Trump had been a Democrat, backing strong gun control and abortion rights. Today he says he’s for the Second Amendment and pro-life. But when asked who he’d like for the Supreme Court, he suggested his sister, a sitting federal judge. It turns out she’s liberal and pro-choice.  Trump also donated to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. In 2012, after she had served almost four years as secretary of state, Trump had nothing but praise for her. He told CNN: “I think she does a good job ... The record of Hillary Clinton and how did she do as secretary of state, probably above and beyond everybody else.” Folks, this was in 2012.  Still, at some point Trump says he became a conservative. I am not sure when. In 2012, Trump sharply criticized Mitt Romney.  “He had a crazy policy of self-deportation which was maniacal,” Trump said of Romney’s plan for the nation’s illegal immigrants.



the left (Democraps) has become an army of bullies, and Americans are sick to death of it.  But it is not enough for the left, which is on a permanent rampage against aspects of American culture that were once considered admirable and praiseworthy.  Into the ring steps Donald Trump. Yes, he is boorish and brash, vociferous and vulgar. But he says that he is willing to do what elected Republicans have not done. And whether or not that will prove to be true, at the very least he refuses to be cowed by the talking heads of the self-appointed elites, and this is an endless source of satisfaction. Americans have taken enough punches. They want someone who will punch back.


Perhaps this is what Ross Perot meant in the 1992 presidential debate when he famously said, “We have got to stop sending jobs overseas. It’s pretty simple: If you’re paying $12, $13, $14 an hour for factory workers and you can move your factory South of the border, pay a dollar an hour for labor… have no health care — that’s the most expensive single element in making a car — have no environmental controls, no pollution controls and no retirement, and you don’t care about anything but making money, there will be a giant sucking sound going south.”  So, whatever the supposed virtues of globalization — lower prices of goods and services or more economic growth — there is a definite cost that must also be considered, and that is the ability to employ American workers.  Adding to the malaise is the higher cost of doing business in the U.S. brought on by greater taxes, more regulations and, more generally, just higher property and labor costs.



If, by some miracle, Trump became president, what kind of president would he be? Do we need another self-centered know-it-all in the White House to replace the one we have now?  Among the other Republican candidates, Dr. Ben Carson is a monumental figure in his field, and he is clearly revered even by people who would not vote for him. But votes are how elections are decided.

The governors among the Republican candidates can at least be judged by how their track record stands up in running a governmental organization. So can Senator Ted Cruz, who was solicitor general in Texas. But Senator Marco Rubio has no comparable experience -- and his inexperience has shown up in his abortive attempt to join Democrats in promoting amnesty.


(Rubio-RINO 2.0 version of Owebummer)  How do you trust Rubio on any issue after he so blatantly lied on immigration? The Gang-of-8 Bill was little more than a Democrat wish list with a couple of bells and whistles slapped on to give cover for squishy Republicans to support it as well. The bill legalized illegals before adding in any kind of security and despite Rubio’s dishonest hype, it would have done little to secure the border.  Well, we had Al-Qaeda then. Stopping that terrorist organization from getting across the border wasn’t important?  Keep in mind that Rubio can’t win a general election unless he gets the support of the 30-35% of GOP voters that currently support Donald Trump. Do you really think that after supporting Trump for months, those voters are going to fall in line behind an establishment candidate who is best known for betraying the people who supported him to push amnesty and open borders?


Republicans believe, "Don't criticize Obama! Don't be seen as shutting down the government! Don't disagree! Oh, my God, you're gonna be seen as an obstructionist and not wanting to make Washington work and the independents not gonna like it. They're gonna run right to the Democrats." Well, you can't find somebody that's more angry, obstinate, in-your-face, insulting, you, mean -- everything that the Republicans believe turns off moderates.  Trump is Hoovering them up. 


If voters want an angry candidate, they are not going to get it from Carson, whose demeanor is unswervingly cool and deliberative.  He continues to build on a groundswell of goodwill and popularity all over the country that is sure to carry over into anything he decides to do next.


How could a faithful evangelical vote for (TRUMP) a man who admits to having engaged in multiple affairs with married women, says he has nothing in his life to repent to Our Lord about, was the first casino owner to open a strip club, has abandoned the cause of marriage and who once said he'd consider appointing to the US Supreme Court a federal judge (his sister) who approves of the barbaric partial birth abortion procedure where the baby is killed in the process of being born? (not including using Big Govt and imminent domain to steal, not including buying influence with politicians, not including no plans to save our country from Big Govt, Debt and unfunded welfare.)



The curious part is why people who flee the excesses of progressive regimes continue to embrace progressive notions about human nature, God and government. They’re importing the very scourge that caused them to leave. We should keep this in mind as millions of people from authoritarian countries pour over America’s southern border and are scooped up by vote-seeking groups that promise them the moon. Will America change them or will they change America?   Who needs God when government will supply everyone’s needs at someone else’s expense?


It takes more faith to depend on the government than it does to trust in God's provision, but you'd never know it watching Progressives (Democraps-RINOs) worship at their government golden calf that owns nothing at all unless it takes it from you.  To whom shall we bow, to God or the government?



The Daily Caller reports on Obama’s failures:  Over the first five years of Obama’s presidency, the U.S. economy grew more slowly than during any five-year period since just after the end of World War II, averaging less than 1.3 percent per year. If we leave out the sharp recession of 1945-46 following World War II, Obama looks even worse, ranking dead last among all presidents since 1932. No other president since the Great Depression has presided over such a steadily poor rate of economic growth during his first five years in office. This slow growth should not be a surprise in light of the policies this administration has pursued.



The commander of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps of Iran is now stating that his sailors have extracted tons of intelligence from the US sailors that were captured in January. They got the intel from their cell phones and computers. This is a catastrophic military breach. They are also threatening to release the info to the public in a Snowdenesque move. Meanwhile, Obama and Kerry keep playing down an act of war as no big deal. They probably don’t think it is because this was intentional. It’s the redistribution of intel and military secrets. I call that treason.



Just 3,000 of roughly 6 million illegal visa overstays over the last 20 years are under active investigation by the Department of Homeland Security.


An automated entry-and-exit screening system for foreign visitors was passed by Congress in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996. Since then, Congress has approved funding on seven different occasions, but three presidents, Pres. Clinton, Bush, and Obama have failed to implement the system.  It's not an exaggeration to say that had a biometric entry-exit system been in place in 2001, the 9/11 attacks could have been prevented. I urge you to begin taking our national security and the integrity of our immigration system seriously by doing all you can to ensure implementation of a biometric entry-exit system at all ports of entry.



REFUGEES:  On Monday, Swedish authorities revealed that a squad of 10 police officers last week was forced to flee from a violent mob of migrants when the police arrived to rescue a 10-year-old boy who had been repeatedly raped at a refugee center.  A police officer described the scene for the Vestmanlands Läns Tidning newspaper: “Even more people appeared behind us. I was mentally prepared to fight for my life. We were 10 police officers in a narrow corridor. And I hear someone yell that there is an emergency exit.”  Staff at the the Signalisten asylum in Västerås had tried to recover the boy, but had been unable to because of the hostile refugees, so they called police.  Refusal to learn from the experiences of Sweden and the rest of Europe means Americans can expect the same sort of violence to be coming to a neighborhood near them soon, courtesy of our president.



Newsmax reported that some Texas lawmakers have suggested making any refugees entering their state take a polygraph to weed out potential radical Islamic terrorists.  While this idea might not be guaranteed to stop Islamic extremists from infiltrating America, the Lone Star State deserves credit for trying something to protect its people — .which is more than the Obama White House wants to do.  A simpler solution to this refugee problem would be not to take any refugees at all until our government can figure out a way to guarantee our safety.



This past week Ali Muhammad Brown was sentenced to 36 years in prison after being found guilty of armed robbery in New Jersey. However, Brown’s case isn’t one of simple violence. The Seattle Muslim has also been accused of four separate counts of murder and of a charge of terrorism.  A Seattle man charged with killing four people in Washington and New Jersey in 2014 to protest U.S. foreign policy was on a federal terrorism watch list ….While Brown was not a migrant, he was already known to our government and even being monitored as a possible terrorist supporter. Even with this extra level of scrutiny, observation and watchfulness, our government could not stop this man from committing terrible violence on two different sides of the country! If the government is unable to even monitor the actions of one “known” terrorist sympathizer, how can we expect them to be able to protect us from the tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands if President Obama and John Kerry get their way) of unvetted Muslim refugees?


(They should have to show on screen this conflict of interest, so viewers know what they are getting) 

Media Bias: With his wife running for Congress as a Democrat, MSNBC “journalist” Chris Matthews has become more rabidly partisan than usual.   (Matthews) The former aide to Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill was on a short list of presidential debate moderators.  Democratic front-runner Bernie Sanders’ camp has accused Matthews of being in the tank for Hillary Clinton. His wife Kathleen Matthews, now running for a U.S. congressional seat from Maryland, has worked with Clinton and shares major donors with her.



No one is forced to use the service of Wall Streeters. Financial exchange is voluntary.  “Wall Street,” broadly defined to include investment banks, Silicon Valley venture capital, private equity funds and other types of participants in capital markets, create value by matching investors and savers and helping companies to obtain needed capital in the most efficient way.  They do a good job and are paid well if they succeed in directing savings to their highest and best use. They subtract from potential value and are paid poorly if they direct savings to low and poor uses.  Warren Buffett counts among the world’s richest because of his acute ability to match his shareholders’ capital with investment opportunities. It is strange that no one criticizes Buffett when he is doing what Wall Street does, while polishing his anti-greed image by currying political favor from Omaha, Neb.  Wall Street (including Buffett) intermediates between saving and investment because savers, such as contributors to retirement accounts or buyers of insurance policies, have little expertise in matching their savings to investments.  Business investors create new business and expand established ones, but they are not specialized in seeking out savers to fund their plans.  In Europe and Japan, banks play the role of Wall Street. They decide who gets investment finance and who does not. In many cases, these banks are closely tied to related businesses or to state and national governments.  Like their Chinese counterparts, they are inclined to allocate capital to lower-return but politically attractive uses.



For the last 30 years, when the ratio of gold-to-oil spikes, something systemically serious occurs globally..


Seven Fear & Greed Indicators-- How we calculate the index More »



U.S. District Judge Amy Berman has struck down Obama's assertion of executive privilege over documents pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, the Department of Justice program that allowed the sale and trafficking of thousands of weapons to violent Mexican drug cartels. Berman was appointed to the Court by President Obama in 2011. POLITICO has the details: 



Former ISIS child soldiers have revealed how the jihadi group snatch young boys from their families and subject them to savage punishments if they refuse to become child soldiers.  The children who managed to escape describe how they were indoctrinated into the jihadi group’s radical brand of Islam and taught that they should execute their ‘unbeliever’ parents.  A Kurdish commander described the challenge his men face when fighting against ISIS. He said that ISIS frequently send children out on the frontline, wearing concealed explosive vests.  Aziz Abdullah Hadur said that when fighting on the Gweyr frontline, his men had witnessed numerous child soldiers fighting for ISIS on the frontline.  ‘Many times when we are facing ISIS, we see the children at the front line and they’re wearing explosive vests. They are brainwashed,’ he told CNN.  He explained how he was often faced with the challenge of helping children who have been freed by ISIS but who could be suicide bombers.  ‘When they make it through our lines they kill our fighters. It’s an unbelievably hard decision. You don’t know what to do because if you don’t kill them they’ll kill you,’ he lamented.



Babylonia has no regrets about leaving behind her two children and her job as a hairdresser to join a Christian female militia battling against the Islamic State group in Syria.  The fierce-looking 36-year-old in fatigues from the Syriac Christian minority in the northeast believes she is making the future safe for her children.  "I miss Limar and Gabriella and worry that they must be hungry, thirsty and cold. But I try to tell them I'm fighting to protect their future," she told AFP.  Babylonia belongs to a small, recently created battalion of Syriac Christian women in Hasakeh province who are fighting IS.  They are following in the footsteps of Syria's other main female force battling the jihadists – the women of the YPJ, the female counterpart to the Kurdish People's Protection Units or YPG.



(Big Money can’t buy it all:)  Between $100-150 million was spent on the Bush presidential investment, which turned out to be the Solyndra of political campaigns.   Bush donors remain in a state of shock, as they should, given that over $100 million was spent to clinch…four delegates. That’s a horrible investment.


(Censorship)  Adam Baldwin has had enough of Twitter. After the social media platform’s continued censorship of conservatives, the actor decided he’s leaving and never coming back. The recent banning of conservative Robert Stacy McCain that prompted Baldwin to call it quits.  “It’s really a shame that so-called ‘liberal thinkers’ and the so called ‘tolerant crowd’ is intolerant of varying viewpoints,” he said, reports IJR. “They’re so afraid to hear people disagree with them. Instead of ignoring it or providing their own arguments in return, they say “shut up!””



Opening statements of five minutes by each candidate.  Limit the number of primary debates to four—one on economic issues, one on foreign policy, one on social issues, and a final free-for-all debate.


'Hillary for prosecution, not president'


The “big house”, not the White House for Hillary!



Asked by CNN anchor Jake Tapper about the latest development in the months-long email scandal, Mook tried to dismiss the judge’s ruling as a “right-wing” group’s attempt to hurt Clinton’s chances of becoming president. Tapper was quick to point out that Judge Emmett Sullivan, who sits on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, was appointed by Clinton’s own husband, Bill Clinton.


Hillary Clinton's improperunsecure email server appears to have endangered national security even more than previously thought -- and her excuses continue to melt away under intensifying scrutiny.  Fox News exclusively obtained the text of the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP). That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets...  Intelligence from a "special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as "top secret" – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton's private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a "need-to-know" because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection -- or a human asset -- at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server.. former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.  She sure did. Here it is:  This one line in Clinton's NDA completely destroys her "wasn't marked classified" defense https://t.co/zPn1Ifbe6Q pic.twitter.com/jSWXTDzNtr


NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake was charged under the law in April 2010 for retaining classified information on secret surveillance programs. The government claimed it was for the purpose of disclosure.  For disclosing classified information on FBI wiretaps to a blogger, FBI translator named Shamai Leibowitz was charged under the Espionage Act.  Pfc. Bradley Manning was charged with multiple violations of the Espionage Act in July 2010 after disclosing US government information to WikiLeaks.


Petraeus accepted two years of probation and paid a $100,000 fine for allowing his mistress, Paula Broadwell, to read classified information for research on the biography she was writing about Petraeus.  Carter apparently wants to ensure that Petraeus is treated the same fashion as other miscreant generals and admirals who have lost rank. Yet there is no evidence that Broadwell (who enjoyed a military security clearance of her own) ever shared the classified information with anyone or disclosed it in the biography.  That does not excuse the bad judgment of Petraeus. But it does invite an obvious comparison with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She not only sent classified information over her unsecured email to several individuals, but remains untruthful about that fact.  Petraeus and his team promoted the so-called “surge” of troops into Iraq, and enlisted tens of thousands of Iraqis to join the American effort to defeat radical terrorists and insurrectionists.

Petraeus’ efforts saved Iraq — and thousands of American and Iraqi lives. Barack Obama entered office in 2009 with a mostly quiet Iraq. Petraeus’ legacy explains why Vice President Joe Biden claimed Iraq as possibly one of the administration’s “greatest achievements.” Obama himself boasted in late 2011 that he was pulling out all U.S. forces from a “sovereign, stable and self-reliant” Iraq.  That claim was true — until Obama’s politically driven skedaddle from Iraq created a vacuum to be filled by Islamic State terrorists.


18 U.S.C. 1924 .     Other federal laws she potentially violated range from conspiracy to commit a federal offense to Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in a federal investigation.



Michael Bay’s 13 Hours brings home the anger and sadness of the 2012 Benghazi attack. Note: The Center for Security Policy has prepared a detailed timeline of events leading up to and following the Benghazi attack, a must-read to answer the question why no help ever arrived.


March 2011: Despite repeated Qaddafi efforts to negotiate abdication & exile, Obama White House & Clinton State Dept. insisted on official support to Libyan Muslim Brotherhood & al-Qa’eda militias; a Presidential Intelligence Finding authorized covert assistance & Chris Stevens managed the weapons flow from Qatar to Libyan al-Qa’eda militias

20 Oct 2011: Qaddafi was killed, the Libya MB-led Transitional National Council took over & soon black flag of jihad was seen flying over Benghazi courthouse

Jan-Sep 2012: Security conditions in Benghazi deteriorated drastically, Ansar al-Sharia formed from earlier AQ-MB-linked militias & attacked Western interests, including the US mission


3. Hillary Clinton   $45 mil      a greedy, white privileged 1%...



Why does the left have such an affinity and affection for criminals? Because deep down they know they are criminals themselves. Lincoln defined slavery as, “you work, I eat.” That is the mantra of the left (Democraps).  Living off the labor of others is called theft whether the gun is in the hand of a street criminal or an IRS agent.  This is the thesis of Dinesh D’Souza’s book, “Stealing America: What My Experience with Criminal Gangs Taught Me about Obama, Hillary, and the Democratic Party.” D’Souza argues philosophical political discussions with liberals are totally pointless since they have no philosophy other than, we want what you’ve got and they will use the government to get it and whatever con they can think of to justify it.   Was Solyndra really an effort to build solar panels or was it a criminal enterprise to rip the taxpayers off for millions of dollars? Did anyone go to jail for that?

'When you investigate all Clinton scandals, you find DEAD people'

As people start to uncover the sordid, sexual past of the Clinton family, there are dark, disturbing details coming to light.
Among the nefarious activities are "death lists" and special orders to sic the IRS on these famous women ...

Read the latest now on WND.com.


“The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible ‘intersection’ of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News,” wrote Herridge and Brown.  “This new investigative track is in addition to the focus on classified material found on Clinton’s personal server,” they added.

Hillary for prosecution, not president! Join the sizzling campaign to put Mrs. Clinton where she really belongs

The news greatly ratchets up the legal risk for Clinton.  “This is felony corruption. Is there a connection, the FBI says, between the government of whatever country giving Bill Clinton a million-dollar speech fee and the then-secretary of state, who happens to be his spouse, making a decision that benefits that country?” said former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Victoria Toensing, who is also a former assistant U.S. attorney.  Toensing believes the probe was expanded a while ago and the nation is only finding out about it now. She also suspects that while the rest of Washington was waiting for Benghazi-related emails, the FBI was able to recover additional messages that led its work in this direction.  “I’m sure when they got into her server and saw all the emails they saw all kinds of back and forth between Bill Clinton getting paid and her making decisions at the State Department,” said Toensing.  "This Justice Department under this administration prosecuted and convicted Gov. (Bob) McDonnell of Virginia for just making a few phone calls for somebody he had known for several years," Toensing said.

"This is far beyond what McDonnell did. He made a few phone calls, which never amounted to anything. If Bill Clinton got paid for a speech ... and Hillary Clinton made decisions favorable to that entity, business or country in a reasonable time frame, that is per se a violation of law."  The expanded FBI investigation into Clinton's activities comes on the heels of a potentially damaging email in which Clinton appears to instruct a top aide to send a secure message through non-secure means and without markings that the information was classified.   Toensing said Clinton has two problems on this front: that she kept classified information on an unauthorized server and that she had a responsibility to know what information is classified whether it is marked or not.

Hillary for prosecution, not president! Join the sizzling campaign to put Mrs. Clinton where she really belongs

She said the law in 18 U.S.C. §1924 is crystal clear.  "It says it is a crime to put classified information in 'an unauthorized location.' It's as simple as that," Toensing said.



Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is open to the idea of nominating President Barack Obama for a seat on the Supreme Court, she said Tuesday, responding to a question at an Iowa town hall.  “I will certainly take that under advisement,” she said in Decorah, responding to a man’s recommendation. “I mean, he's brilliant, he can set forth an argument and he was a law professor, so he’s got lots of credentials.”



Another Democrat who has no idea what the difference is between a socialist and a democrat. That doesn’t worry anyone else?



And it’s all ‘legal’ because they use their fortunes to buy as many political prostitutes in Washington as they want or need to write loopholes into laws or to gut regulations.”  As far as loopholes and regulations go, a dispassionate observer could easily conclude that the $5 million Soros gave to get Barack Obama elected president in 2008 was simply a Wall Street fat cat self-servingly purchasing the Dodd-Frank law that President Obama later happily signed.  As the Washington Examiner’s Tim Carney wrote, “if your goal were to foster more political cronyism, reward lobbyists, entrench incumbents, enrich the politically connected and get the revolving door spinning faster, you would have a hard time crafting a more useful piece of legislation than the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill.”  Somehow, Soros’ fortune has more than doubled under the Obama presidency..The MoveOn.org and Media Matters sugar daddy has now given another $6 million to Clinton’s super PAC Priorities USA Action, once again placing Soros “among the biggest givers in all of American politics.”  The Soros-financed MoveOn.org, meanwhile, has backed Clinton rival Bernie Sanders. But the important thing to remember is what Soros does with his money roll: funding the Democratic party, which has come to fully embrace the causes on which he has spent billions.



the democratic socialist ideal is to create a casino society, where everybody plays but few win, and nearly all walk away with much less.  The winners in this society will ultimately be the house itself, as any other winner will be deprived of their gains as surely as Bernie sits tied with Hillary because super-delegates negate his double-digit drubbing of the queen in waiting.

I urge my fellow millennials: keep striving for equality of opportunity and fair play. Just don’t expect the government to be any better than any other casino, where the house always comes out on top.


In the overall delegate count, Clinton holds a commanding lead after a razor-thin victory in Iowa and a shellacking in New Hampshire. Clinton has 394 delegates, both super and electorally assigned, to only 42 for Sanders.

Bernie Sanders won 60% of the vote in New Hampshire Tuesday yet will collect fewer delegates in the electoral college than distant-second finisher Hillary Clinton. This is just plain rigging.  The Democratic Party had better reeducate itself about the word “democratic.”  “Tonight, we served notice to the political and economic establishment of this country that the American people will not continue to accept a corrupt campaign finance system that is undermining democracy,” Sanders, an avowed socialist, told his supporters in his Tuesday night victory speech in New Hampshire.  (Hillary would be the big money campaign recipient, but Sanders “won” in NH, likewise Cruz won over Billionaire Trump in IA.)  Well, he may have his eyes on the campaign finance system as the problem in the elections as many on the left do. But the more obvious one is that he walloped his rival, Hillary Clinton, 60% to 38% Tuesday, yet he takes home just 15 delegates for the Democratic nomination, same as the 15 she does…Democrats are setting themselves up for war with their own party members based on process of permitting “superdelegates” for 747, or almost a sixth, of all 5,083 nominating delegates.  Superdelegates are party insiders, governors, campaign operatives and former office holders who have nominating power but who are not selected on the basis of primary results. It means they can vote any way they want, even if it’s at odds with what the voters want.  Instead of railing against Wall Street, Sanders should be vowing to change the system of cronyism and insider-ism in his own party, a system that has undermined the will of his voters and ironically separated the word “democratic” from the Democrats.


We are living in a "Banana Republic" where the media is bought, paid for and in the bag for Hillary Clinton.  Reid “fixed” the results for Hillary by twisting the arms of casino and union bosses. Why isn’t the national media reporting this? She needed pure corruption, intimidation and manipulation to squeak out an unimpressive win in Nevada. After spending millions of dollars on TV ads, she needed union and casino bosses to basically order their union employees to take half their day off, and pay them to vote for Hillary.  Do other companies get caucus sites placed inside their building to enable employees to vote with ease? Why should union employees receive something of value that I don’t, in order to stuff the ballot box for Hillary Clinton? What did she agree to give to the union and the casino bosses in return for this favor?




The final results of the GOP Presidential primary in South Carolina are in, and all 50 delegates have been awarded to Donald Trump.  The GOP primary allowed Democrat cross-over voters in the "all or nothing" primary, while most future states proportionally distribute their delegates, so it will take MONTHS for any candidate to obtain the 1,237 delegates needed to win the GOP primary.  South Carolina results, with Iowa/NH delegates:  Trump:  33% with 67 delegates so far
Rubio:  22% with 11 delegates so far   Cruz:  22% with 10 delegates so far  Kasich:  8% with 4 delegates so far  Carson:  7% with 3 delegates so far

Part of this may be the result of many changes the Republican National Committee made last year. The “establishment” changed Republican primary rules, finance changes (hidden in the CRomnibus bill), how delegates could be distributed, and the dates of primaries were changed.  The “establishment” plan succeeded in that its road-map was established to block Ted Cruz, or anyone like him, from winning.  The GOP “establishment” sought to consolidate power within its existing structure in order to intentionally prevent a grassroots candidate from winning.



The Commission had provided that the federal voter registration form would include Alabama, Georgia and Kansas requirements to enforce their respective state proof-of-citizenship voter registration laws.  For Alabama the new federal form states, “To register in Alabama you must: be a citizen of the United States. The county board of registrars shall accept any completed application for registration, but an applicant shall not be registered until the applicant has provided satisfactory evidence of United States citizenship.”  But if the injunction is granted by Judge Leon and the new federal voter registration form is removed, then Alabama, Georgia and Kansas would have to begin processing federal applications to the state voter rolls once again even if there is no proof of citizenship.


the American culture is rapidly descending into a socialist point of view…and it’s brainwashing our kids. This meme illustrates the differences in mindset perfectly! (Must see, please click!) We need to get rid of this sense of entitlement and poverty mindset that has been engrained in this young generation. The answer to the economy of this country is to quit to quit getting people to depend on the government for fish, and invest in teaching them how to fish!



“Democratic socialism” just means people voted for their own misery.   If you like being told what to think, vote for socialism.

If you like being told when to see a doctor or what care you may receive, vote for socialism.  If you like working hard only to give your paycheck to government, vote for socialism.  If you like being categorized and used according to your race or gender instead of your achievements, vote for socialism.   If you like being lied to by the media, vote for socialism.  If you like not only being unable to care for yourself and make your own decisions but legally prevented from doing so, vote for socialism.  So what’s wrong with socialism? It’s about your freedom, stupid.



Hillary Clinton supporters are asked to sign a petition to approve of “her choice” of Communist Karl Marx to be her vice president if she’s elected President of the United States.



Socialism will take something from someone else who earned it and give it to you and in return, you will do what socialists want you to do. If you’re irresponsible, lazy, have a habit of making poor decisions or just need a master, this can seem like a good deal. You can work a menial job and get paid more than you’re worth! You can go to college and you don’t have to pay for it! Someone else will give you a place to live, food stamps, welfare and health care! In return, you just have to give up on your pride, your dreams and control of your own life.  Capitalism is not perfect, but it won’t bankrupt the country, it doesn’t reward failure and it can’t control you like socialism.   At the end of the day, socialism is for slaves who are willing to give up their freedom for promises that they’ll be given some minimal level of support no matter what. On the other hand, capitalism is for people who want the freedom to rise or fall based on their own effort.



"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." -- Margaret Thatcher

"Socialism is when government's taking care of you, you send all your money to the government, the government decides how to spend it instead of letting the people spend it and make all those decisions." -- Bob Latta

 "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." -- Adolf Hitler

"The goal of socialism is communism." -- Vladimir Lenin

socialism harms, it weakens the economies of countries that have tried it. Weaker economies hurt everybody in them. Socialism kills incentive, opportunity, freedom. It is the opposite of what America is all about. Look, socialism always harms the people it claims to help the most. It handicaps them, leaving them weaker, less self-determined, less free." -- Bobby Jindal

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” -- Frédéric Bastiat

I believe that all forms of socialism have been proven over time to result in a loss of both economic and civil liberties, with increasing poverty." -- John Mackey

“The champions of socialism call themselves progressives, but they recommend a system which is characterized by rigid observance of routine and by a resistance to every kind of improvement. They call themselves liberals, but they are intent upon abolishing liberty. They call themselves democrats, but they yearn for dictatorship. They call themselves revolutionaries, but they want to make the government omnipotent. They promise the blessings of the Garden of Eden, but they plan to transform the world into a gigantic post office." --  Ludwig von Mises

19) "Socialists cry 'Power to the people', and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean--power over people, power to the State." -- Margaret Thatcher

20) "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." -- Winston Churchill


Mein Kampf:736 "The swastika had been used as a symbol of the Germanic [pagan] religion by folkish groups in primitive cults."

Mein Kampf:845 "Nazism must claim the right to force its principles on the whole and educate everyone about its ideas and thoughts without regard to previous boundaries."

Mein Kampf:848 "Rarely is a great theorist a great leader. More usually he is an agitator who shows the ability of imparting an idea to the masses as a psychologist and demagogue. For to lead means to be able to move [seduce] the masses."

Mein Kampf:851 "The most striking success of the revolution of a view of life will always be won whenever the new view of life [religotic] is taught [dictated] to all people, and if necessary, is forced upon them."

Mein Kampf 960 "We must never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are common bloodstained criminals, the scum of humanity. They butchered and rooted out millions of leading intellectuals with savagery. They have imposed the most frightful regime of tyranny of all time. The Marxist and their Jewish comrades combine bestial horror and an inconceivable gift for lying. They intend to impose bloody oppression on the whole world. One does not conclude a treaty with someone whose sole interest is destruction."

Mein Kampf:920 "We must reimplant in the people the spirit of proud self-respect, manly defiance, and wrathful hate."



Socialism perverts the biblical notion of charity, turning it into an excuse to empower the state. Since it advances at the expense of existing institutions, violating natural human relations rooted in the family, socialism is a driving force behind the sexual revolution. Hence, modern progressives naturally embrace abortion and promote the redefinition of marriage and family while denigrating religious faith – with the notable exception of Islam. As families fail, the state grows larger to pick up the pieces.



After the bloodless annexation of Austria and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, Hitler assumed that Britain and France would not go to war at all if he went into Poland. Yet Western appeasement did not alone guarantee the outbreak of World War II.  The Germans invaded Poland only after a guarantee from Josef Stalin that the Soviet Union would soon join in attacking the Poles from the east. The two dictatorships could then divvy up the country.  Stalin’s communist Russia had foolishly gambled that by making a deal with Nazi Germany, Hitler would leave the Soviets alone. Yet Stalin’s collaboration with Hitler eventually guaranteed that Russia also would be double-crossed — less than two years after signing an agreement with the Third Reich. Germany surprise-attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Due to Stalin’s collaboration, almost 30 million Russians would die on the Eastern Front over the next four years.  A third, fatal decision was necessary to ensure a war. The U.S. had entered World War I late in April 1917, and it revived the sagging Allied effort, helping to crush the Germany army and win the war by November 1918.  But by 1919, America had rapidly disarmed and forgotten its key role in World War I.  America’s isolationism and disarmament also helped prompt another global war. Had the U.S. kept its military strong after World War I, and had it entered into a formal alliance with its former World War I partners, Germany never would have risked a second war against the combined strength of a fully armed Britain, France and United States.  The world of 2016 is eerily beginning to resemble the powder keg of 1939 Europe. Iran, China and North Korea, along with radical Islamic terrorist groups, all have particular contempt for Western democracies.  The European Union is largely unarmed. Yet it still trusts that it can use its vaunted “smart diplomacy” to reason with its enemies.  Appeasement, collaboration and isolationism always prove a lethal mix — past and present.



Islamabad writer Dr. Farrukh Saleem pointed out in 2005 indisputable facts about the Islamic world.  Combined, 57 Islamic countries are the world’s poorest and most illiterate:  In fact, historians have estimated that Muslims have enslaved over 100 million people over 14 centuries. Additionally, Muslims enslaved Africans 1,000 years prior to the European African slave trade and continued another 100 years after Europeans abolished it.  Not to mention, that Islam subjugates women and girls


After Muslims Rape 2,000 Women, the Women Turn Around and Form an Entire Army to Deal with Islamic Jihadists



The decision to grant al-Husseini the position was made by Herbert Samuel, the first high commissioner of Palestine. It was odd that Samuel, a British Jew, would appoint a man who would be responsible for so much unrest within the Mandatory area. Al-Husseini in fact had been sentenced to ten years in prison by the British for inciting riots in 1920. None of that sentence was served, as al-Husseini had fled to Transjordan, and was soon after amnestied by Samuel himself.  During World War II, the mufti was involved in the mobilization of support for Germany among Muslims. In November 1941 the Mufti met with Hitler.


Speech by Adolf Hitler, January 31, 1939 (Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals - Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949-1953, Vol XIII, p. 131):

Today I will once more be a prophet: If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!


Germany was at the present time engaged in a life and death struggle with two citadels of Jewish power: Great Britain and Soviet Russia. Theoretically there was a difference between England's capitalism and Soviet Russia's communism: actually, however, the Jews in both countries were pursuing a common goal. This was the decisive struggle: on the political plane, it presented itself in the main as a conflict between Germany and England, but ideologically it was a battle between National Socialism and the Jews.


Jews were generally viewed with contempt by their Muslim neighbors; peaceful coexistence between the two groups involved the subordination and degradation of the Jews. In the ninth century, Baghdad’s Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany. 6

When Hitler introduced the Nuremberg racial laws in 1935, he received telegrams of congratulation from all corners of the Arab world. 17 Later, during the war, one of his most ardent supporters was the Mufti of Jerusalem.  An Arabic translation of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf was distributed in East Jerusalem and the territories controlled by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and became a bestseller.




the socialist spending sprees of Denmark and Norway are bankrolled by oil: Big Oil, to be specific.  While Sanders is calling for a ban on oil production on U.S. government land, the Norwegian government, which owns a staggering 67% of Statoil ASA, the largest oil company in Norway, is producing oil and natural gas on government land — and lots of it. Norway is the largest oil producer in Western Europe and the seventh largest oil exporter in the world. The Nordic nation is also the leading exporter of natural gas to Western Europe, selling more natural gas to Western European counties than Russia does. Incredibly, half of Norway’s exports are related to petroleum.  The Economist reports that the Norwegian oil boom, which followed the discovery of oil in the North Sea in 1969, has enabled a boom in public spending.  Without oil and natural gas production, there’s little to no chance that the Norwegian welfare state could persist in its current form.  Although Sanders and his supporters often talk about concepts such as “free” college, “free” health care and expanded Social Security, we all know that nothing is really free. Ultimately, someone must foot the bill for this largesse.  It is one thing to advocate Scandinavian-style socialism, but it’s inconsistent and irresponsible to ignore how those countries pay for it.


(Socialism is Envy & Jealousy of hard work, ambition, effort and making something of oneself..)  His family managed to send him to the University of Chicago. Despite a prestigious degree, however, Sanders failed to earn a living, even as an adult. It took him 40 years to collect his first steady paycheck — and it was a government check.  “I never had any money my entire life,” Sanders told Vermont public TV in 1985, after settling into his first real job as mayor of Burlington.  Sanders spent most of his life as an angry radical and agitator who never accomplished much of anything. And yet now he thinks he deserves the power to run your life and your finances — “We will raise taxes;” he confirmed Monday, “yes, we will.”   Sanders took his first bride to live in a maple sugar shack with a dirt floor, and she soon left him. Penniless, he went on unemployment. Then he had a child out of wedlock. Desperate, he tried carpentry but could barely sink a nail. “He was a shi**y carpenter,” a friend told Politico Magazine. “His carpentry was not going to support him, and didn’t.”  Then he tried his hand freelancing for leftist rags, writing about “masturbation and rape” and other crudities for $50 a story. He drove around in a rusted-out, Bondo-covered VW bug with no working windshield wipers. Friends said he was “always poor” and his “electricity was turned off a lot.” They described him as a slob who kept a messy apartment — and this is what his friends had to say about him.  The only thing he was good at was talking … non-stop … about socialism and how the rich were ripping everybody off. “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed,” the bitter layabout said. “I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”  So he tried politics, starting his own socialist party.  Sure, Sanders may not be a hypocrite, but this is nothing to brag about. His worthless background contrasts sharply with the successful careers of other “outsiders” in the race for the White House, including a billionaire developer, a world-renowned neurosurgeon and a Fortune 500 CEO.  The choice in this election is shaping up to be a very clear one. It will likely boil down to a battle between those who create and produce wealth, and those who take it and redistribute it.


Because we want a sovereign nation, closed borders, the rule of law followed and we don’t want terrorists brought in by the fricking plane full, the left paints us as bigots and haters. We are patriots and those who love our country and the laws and principles she was founded on. Bernie not so much. He sucks at economics and basic math, he thinks moral, upright Americans are hatemongers and he wants the government to rule every part of our lives. Everything will be free, but you’ll be taxed to death to get it.


One wonders whether Sanders would receive as much cheer from his youthful supporters if he were honest with them and told them he was going to provide for their "free" education by taking the earnings of another or by enslaving professors.  One cannot get something for nothing.  Donald Trump and business and labor groups, who are against Americans purchasing goods made in other countries, can simply ask the American people not to purchase from abroad.


Democratic front-runner Bernie Sanders says concerns about his honeymoon trip to the USSR in the ’80s are “silly.” He’ll have a harder time explaining his months-long stay at a hardcore Stalinist camp in the ’60s.  It’s clear the self-avowed socialist is even further left than he has admitted. Fifty years ago, during the height of the Cold War, he sought out communist indoctrination.  The Israeli press earlier this month broke the story that Sanders, who is Jewish, spent several months at an Israeli commune co-founded by a Soviet spy.  As a college student in 1963, Sanders was a guest of the Hashomer Hatzair, a Marxist youth movement founded by communist Ya’akov Hazan, who called the Soviet Union a second homeland and eulogized Stalin as “the great leader and extolled commander.  Ignoring Stalin’s atrocities, Hazan oozed: “His huge historical achievements will guide generations in their march toward the reign of socialism and communism the world over.”   Voters ought to know. Only, the media aren’t interested in finding out (like Obama, Hillary etc. the Big Marxist Media covers for its own) So far no debate moderator has asked Sanders about his commie camp days. Strikingly, even Fox News let Sanders off the hook in a rare interview last Sunday.  1985: In a letter to the (communist-controlled Nicaragua) Sandinistas, according to the New York Post, Sanders pledged his support for their “struggle,” calling it a “heroic revolution” while accusing the Reagan administration of engaging in “terrorist activities.”  1985: In the same interview, he praised Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, claiming “he educated their kids, gave their kids health care, totally transformed society.” He later showed his affection by traveling to Havana and meeting with its mayor.  1985: In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sanders proclaimed: “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed. I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”  1988:  One day after wedding his second and current wife, Jane Sanders, the two traveled to the USSR for their honeymoon. Upon returning, Sanders praised communist health care and housing, noting “the cost of both services is much, much higher in the United States.”  Sanders isn’t just a “socialist.” Or even a communist sympathizer. He is a hard-core communist collaborator who is far, far outside the American political mainstream.



How very interesting that in American politics that blue is associated with the Democrat party and red with the Republican party. If you take the blue pill you can stay in the fantasy world of the Matrix…but the red pill will free your mind, and you will see how deep the rabbit hole goes. The red pill represents freedom and liberty, allowing the individual to separate from the collective. However, the real world is not one of fantasy and pleasure; it is about survival, working hard, and evading the sentinels – the hunter machines, the liberal progressive media.



For those who believe that electricity comes from the wall, food comes from the grocery store and clean water comes in a recyclable plastic bottle, Obama's latest tax proposal to put a $10-per-barrel tax on oil consumed in the United States must seem like a peachy idea.  Who will pay this tax?  Well, it will be collected by the oil companies — who will get the blame for the resulting price increase — but in reality, the average person trying to survive in the current stagnant wage environment is the one who will pay.  Leave it to Obama to view the good news that a working single-mother can fill up her 13-gallon gas tank for under $25 as an opportunity to soak her for more taxes.  And this is not even mentioning those who are currently able to heat their homes using lower-cost home heating oil during this winter season, saving a few coins due to the collapsing oil prices. No windfall for the American consumer can be allowed in Obama's world, as he covets that money being saved to spend on his priorities.  Lower oil prices affect the cost of plastics, airline tickets, the delivery of goods and, overall, have the net result of making things less expensive for consumers. While the low-price good times will not last, the one thing that will would be Obama's $10-per-barrel larceny out of each American's pocket.  One of the problems you get when you hire a president who views your pocketbook as his pocketbook is that he will always believe that the government should get a take of any good fortune you have.



When Florida Gov. Rick Scott took over as the Sunshine State’s chief executive in 2011, the state’s economy was struggling—unemployment hovered around 11 percent, Florida’s tourism industry was suffering and the state had added $5.2 billion to its debt. Now, as Scott heads into his fifth year serving as governor, he’s touting the successes he’s had in boosting Florida’s economy. During Republican Scott’s tenure, Florida’s unemployment rate has dropped to 5 percent, according to preliminary data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and more than 1 million private-sector jobs were added.



“I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73. … It never goes away,” Broaddrick tweeted Wednesday.  "Was dreading seeing my abuser on TV campaign trail for enabler wife, but his physical appearance reflects ghosts of past are catching up," she also tweeted on Tuesday.



When Todd said Clinton had traveled more than any other secretary of state, Trump said she (Hillary) was merely "sitting on an airplane," but didn't accomplish anything in her travels.  Trump reiterated his claim that "hundreds of thousands of people have been killed because of her faulty decisions." He pointed to Libya and the mass migration of Syrian refugees as proof.



Hilarious ‘Bad Lip Reading’ of the First Democrat Debate Is The Best Thing Ever



Charles Woods, the father of former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods who was killed in Benghazi, has challenged the 2016 presidential candidate to sit-down to a polygraph test which could force her to be truthful about the circumstances of his son’s death and Clinton’s words to him in the days after Tyrone’s murder. (how about her unsecure email server, Clinton money laundering Foundation, the Democraps’ war in Libya etc..)



"We have now gotten used to the temper tantrums, or Trumper Tantrums, that he throws," Cruz said Wednesday on "The Hard Line." "Whenever he's unhappy, he melts down and he explodes on Twitter. It is odd behavior for a grown man, and it is more something you would expect to see in Romper Rooms."  Earlier in the day, Cruz told reporters in Iowa his 5-year-old and 7-year-old daughters are better behaved than Trump. Republican voters "don't want Trumpcare socialized medicine" and don't agree with Trump's support of eminent domain "to take your home and to give it to giant corporations and casinos," he said.

Former Democratic president Jimmy Carter said Wednesday that he would choose Donald Trump for the Republican presidential nomination over Ted Cruz.  "I think I would choose Trump, which may surprise some of you," Carter, 91, who was in the White House from 1977 to 1981, said in taking questions after speaking to the British House of Lords in London.   "The reason is, Trump has proven already he’s completely malleable," the former president explained. "I don’t think he has any fixed positions that he’d go the White House and fight for. "On the other hand, Ted Cruz is not malleable," he added. "He has far-right wing policies he'd pursue if he became president."   "Of course, I’m a Democrat and I will support the nominee."

Levin said he isn't impressed at Trump's constant claims he will be better at making deals in Washington than his opponents, since the problem on Capitol Hill isn't the inability to make deals, but "the kind of deals they make."  He accused Trump of "dirty, low-down politics," ..Nixonesque"

Donald Trump is "a menace to conservatism" who should not be elected president of the United States, 22 conservative leaders argue in the new issue of National Review.

Essays by the conservative thinkers were
posted online Thursday night and will be included in the conservative journal's Feb. 15 print edition, which goes to press Jan. 27.  The magazine also includes an editorial, titled "Against Trump," that concludes: "Donald Trump is a menace to American conservatism who would take the work of generations and trample it underfoot in behalf of a populism as heedless and crude as The Donald himself."    "These contributors have many differences of opinion among themselves, but all agree that Trump is not a conservative, he is a mistake for the Republican Party, and he is the wrong man to pick up the pieces after the wreckage of the Obama years."

TAXPAYER ALERT:  Trump actually said that he believed Obamacare wasn’t socialist enough and that the government had to completely take over the healthcare industry!  Donald Trump: “Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, ‘No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private.’ But…”  Scott Pelley: “Universal Healthcare?”  Donald Trump:  I am going to take care of everybody. I don’t care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody’s going to be taken care of much better than they’re taken care of now.”  Scott Pelley: “But who’s going to pay for it?”  Donald Trump: “The government’s gonna pay for it.  (Government is already so broke & it gets its money from TAXPAYERS..)


A dealmaker by definition cuts deals, and Trump has by his own admission cut deals that used the government to serve his interests quite profitably. A dealmaker doesn't stand on principle; instead, a dealmaker looks for common ground.  If the past seven years have taught me anything, it is that the Democrats are unrelenting in their pursuit of bigger, more expansive government, and the GOP consistently looks for common ground that is only partially disastrous, calling that a bipartisan win.  When Trump says he would repeal ObamaCare and replace it with a government-paid healthcare system, I believe him, and that makes me very uneasy.  It reveals a man who accepts big government and would expand it if the right deal were on the table. Lastly, the sudden embrace of Trump by GOP establishment members in an attempt to knock out their real nemesis, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has got to force Trump voters to take pause.


Trump frequently invokes Ronald Reagan’s name to defend his sudden, 180-degree switch from being a life-long, pro-Clinton Democrat to a Reagan Republican.  Both men did make a switch, but almost all the similarities between the two end there. Ronald Reagan’s odyssey from Hollywood liberal to conservative backer took place over almost two decades.  Starting with his 1964 “Time for Choosing” speech that galvanized Americans for Barry Goldwater, dad began a 16-year effort of crisscrossing America to support conservative candidates for office. My dad also served eight years as California’s governor. When he ran for President, he had a proven conservative track record.  Donald Trump doesn’t have one. In fact, Trump still can’t explain his sudden change from being a liberal Democrat. When dad ran in 1980, Trump donated the maximum amount to Jimmy Carter. As the Wall Street Journal reported, Trump also donated to a PAC for Walter Mondale, who ran against dad in 1984.Trump has criticized some candidates for their indiscretions made during their childhood. But what can you say for a grown adult who supported both Carter and Mondale over Ronald Reagan?  One of my dad’s most important lessons to me was how to uncover a phony. He told me not to judge people by what they say; judge them by what they actually do. As President, dad used this “trust but verify” principle on the Soviets and it worked. Voters today should apply Reagan’s verify principle on Trump.  During the 2008 election, Trump told CNN that he wanted President George W. Bush impeached. Then, during Obama’s first year in the White House, after he rammed through Congress a $800 billion stimulus and proposed a radical health care takeover, Trump praised the President, saying he was “amazing” and “truly phenomenal.” 


For the first time on the campaign trail, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz viciously attacked front-runner Donald Trump on Saturday, accusing him of not being a conservative and for lacking the temperament and judgment befitting the White House.

"Donald’s record does not match what he says as a candidate," the Texas senator said to reporters in Fort Mill, S.C., The Washington Post reports.

Trump said he's always had a "great relationship" with Pelosi, and with Reid as well. "If I weren't running for office I would be able to deal with her or anybody," said Trump of Pelosi. "I think I could get along very well with Nancy Pelosi and just about everybody. I think I'll get along well with Chuck Schumer. I was close to Schumer in many ways."


Colbert on Thursday hosted an all-Trump debate — in which Trump debated himself. What followed was a “debate” in which Colbert cut back and forth between some of Trump’s many contradicting past comments.


Who do you trust to appoint the next Supreme Court Justice(s)?

It's a question that is on every one's minds after the sad news this weekend of Justice Antonin Scalia's passing.
Ask yourself:  Is it Donald Trump, who says that his perfect nominee to the Supreme Court would be his sister, 
a judge who has consistently ruled in defense of partial birth abortion?  Whoever wins could have as many as 3 Supreme Court nominees

The Senate must ensure that any nominee’s past history and prior statements demonstrate an uncompromising fidelity to the Constitution as written.   They owe deference to the Constitution, not the president. The importance of preserving the rule of law and adhering to the Constitution is too important for them to continue to hold this manifestly wrong and, frankly, dangerous view.


Obama was one of 25 Democrats who filibustered Alito's nomination, a vote that has come back to haunt him, since Obama is now asking the Senate to confirm his pending nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Many Republicans have said Obama's vote on Alito shows the Senate has the right to block even the important nominees to join the highest court in the land.


"Nowhere in [the Constitution]," Senator Reid insisted in 2005, "does it say the Senate has a duty to give presidential appointees a vote. It says appointments shall be made with the advice and consent of the Senate. That is very different than saying every nominee receives a vote." Then-Senator Obama even fought the Supreme Court nominee of the president who had just been elected! "There are some who believe that the president, having won the election, should have complete authority to appoint his nominee ... [and] there should be no further question as to whether the judge should be confirmed. I disagree with this view."


In a floor speech June 25, 1992, Sen. Joe Biden, then chairman of the Judiciary Committee, argued that senators “should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on [any Bush] nomination until after the political campaign season is over.”



Many people know that Donald Trump made a lot of money in the casino business, but they don’t know just how bad gambling can be for families and communities.  Suicide rates, bankruptcies, divorce, and child abuse all increase in communities after casinos open. It’s not just bad, it’s horrifying.  In fact, it’s why, over at American Principles Project, we decided to launch TrumpWinsYouLose.com today -- to highlight just how much damage billionaire casino moguls like Donald Trump have done to working Americans   Visit TrumpWinsYouLose.com and take a few spins on the Donald Trump slot machine and find out why when Trump wins, we all lose.



His opinions and dissents were often filled with fiery originalist arguments and humorous prose. Some of his dissents in the most recent term were so memorable that the post-hardcore band Coheed and Cambria put them into song.

NOM developed our
Presidential Marriage Pledge and fashioned it along the lines of specific actions a candidate will take if elected president.  Ted Cruz signed NOM's Presidential Marriage Pledge while Donald Trump did not.  In fact, Ted Cruz has already proven himself to be a champion for marriage by authorizing a proposed constitutional amendment preserving the right of states to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. He also has co-sponsored federal legislation, the First Amendment Defense Act, to protect people who believe in traditional marriage from being punished by government for living out their beliefs concerning marriage in their daily lives and at work.  Donald Trump does not support a constitutional amendment to restore marriage to our laws. Worse, he has publicly abandoned the fight for marriage. When the US Supreme Court issued their illegitimate ruling redefining marriage, Trump promptly threw in the towel with these comments on MSNBC:  "You have to go with it. The decision's been made, and that is the law of the land."  Think about the implications of Donald Trump's comments. By his reasoning, the nation would "have to go with" slavery as "the law of the land" once the Supreme Court issued their illegitimate Dred Scott decision.  But the nation didn't go along with this manifestly immoral, anti-constitutional ruling on slavery. Fortunately, we had a political leader, Abraham Lincoln, who was willing to lead a principled fight for the dignity of every human being, and slavery was eventually repudiated.


With this country at a crossroads, facing social degeneration at home and dire threats from abroad, the last thing we need is an uninformed bluffer with a runaway ego in charge of our fate. Neither Trump's talent as a media performer nor his wheeler-dealer economic success is a substitute for the depth of knowledge and the chastening experience required for governing a great nation.  We can only hope that never again will the fate of this nation depend upon a media gimmick like these "debates," which obscure and mislead far more than they inform us about anything beyond the candidates' talents for glib responses. Having each candidate sit down alone with an experienced interviewer for an hour-long, in-depth discussion of the problems facing the country would tell us a lot more about the things that matter. But such discussions would be unlikely to have as high media ratings as the sound-bite circuses we have seen.


The U.S. shipped a Hellfire missile to Europe in 2014 for a routine training exercise. The only problem is that the missile and its highly secret technology ended up in Cuba. Incompetence or something far worse?    Through reverse engineering, an enemy government could discover the missile's secrets or, just as badly, discover ways to counter it — thus making all the money spent on the missile's development totally wasted.  Did Obama know that Cuba had a Hellfire missile that it refused to give back when he began "normalizing" ties with the communist nation? When he travels there, will he demand the missile back?
Is NATO ally Spain penetrated by Cuban intelligence, as Cuban-American writer
Humberto Fontova suggests?  The Wall Street Journal report called it "a loss of sensitive military technology that ranks among the worst-known incidents of its kind." That may understate our own government's incompetence.


In sports, if a game plan is not working, the coach changes it. In medicine, if a course of treatment does not cure a disease, doctors try a different approach. In government, failure means nothing. Government keeps cash flowing with little regard for results. In government, failure endures.



(Federal agencies MUST be Fundamentally Transformed & replaced..IRS by the FAIR TAX &/or moved to state level..EPA) Leading Republican presidential hopefuls Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Ben Carson all vowed to overturn the Obama orders if elected. But if Lynch gets her way, that will be easier said than done.  And Lynch is not the first Obama appointee to make such a comment.  WND reported in April 2015 Obama’s top domestic adviser, Cecilia Muñoz, said she was also working to institutionalize Obama’s policies. Only in the case of Muñoz, her focus would not be on gun control but on immigration.  Muñoz, a former executive with the National Council of La Raza, said it was her job “to make sure we build this really into the DNA across the federal bureaucracy, at a leadership level, but much more importantly to make sure that when political appointees like me are no longer here this (immigration strategy) is built into what those agencies do and think about every day.”



(You and our loved ones are in danger thanks to Owebummer, Biden, Hillary, Democraps all for the Owebummer retreat/withdrawal out of Iraq, Hillary’s Libya war and basic cowardice, appeasement and Democrap Vietnam process to demoralize, defund and defang our war efforts..) The FBI and members of Congress confirm ISIS has been creating high-quality, fake passports for travel to Europe, the U.S. and many other countries who have already been dispersed to their destinations. U.S. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch said he has been briefed on the ISIS passport threat, adding both the FBI and federal immigration officials have confirmed the security nightmare.  "This is a reason for very high concern, especially with the number of refugees piling into Germany and France," Lynch said. Lynch added ISIS got its hands on blank passports and the machine needed to print them when the group's fighters overran Deir ez-Zour in eastern Syria more than a year ago.  "They can put together a very high quality counterfeit passport," said Lynch.



Citing statistics from the Department of Homeland Security, Sessions' Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest reports between 2009 and 2013, DHS issued some 680,000 green cards to migrants, including refugees, from Iraq, Pakistan, Egypt, and Bangladesh, among other countries.   Another 660,000 are likely to be issued over the next five years, the number "could be higher still," Sessions states in a news release.   (ISIS has only an estimated 30,000 fighters)


Below is just a small sampling of refugees:  The Boston Marathon bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers, entered the country as asylum seekers from Chechnya.  Omar Muhammad Kalmio, who came to Minnesota as a boy refugee, was charged with four murders in 2011 in North Dakota, allegedly shooting to death a 19-year-old woman, her brother, mother and the mother’s boyfriend.  Since 2007, the FBI confirms that at least 48 Somalis have left the U.S. to fight for al-Shabab and ISIS. They hold U.S. passports and could return at any time.  Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/lawmakers-to-obama-stop-importing-the-threat/#mB64D8SG5I3Wx47b.99



FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION:  A leaked police report indicated several suspects in the Cologne sexual assaults claimed to be Syrian refugees. One suspect reportedly told authorities: "I am Syrian. You have to treat me kindly. Mrs. Merkel invited me."  German Chancellor Angela Merkel has opened the floodgates to migrants with her "open-door" refugee policy, bringing in 1.1 million asylum-seekers in 2015. She plans to bring hundreds of thousands more Muslim migrants into the nation.  German officials have reportedly been told to cover up crimes committed by migrants in order to avoid spreading panic among the population. And no arrests have been made in Cologne. Several German government officials appear anxious to make sure migrants do not receive any of the blame. Facebook, Google and Twitter are working with German authorities to control speech as angry citizens react to the chaos caused by refugees. The deal with social-media giants comes as Germans fume over 100 sexual assaults and robberies perpetrated by migrants last Friday in Cologne.



The Obama administration cannot be sure of the whereabouts of thousands of foreigners in the U.S. who had their visas revoked over terror concerns and other reasons, a State Department official acknowledged Thursday. 



Lutheran Social Services that has been paid by the federal government to bring Muslims to St. Cloud. But Catholic Charities is not off the hook when it comes to statewide resettlements of Muslims in Minnesota, says Ann Corcoran, a refugee watchdog who blogs at Refugee Resettlement Watch.   More than two dozen young Somalis have left Minnesota since 2007 to go fight for either al-Shabab in Somalia or the Islamic State in Syria, the FBI has confirmed. Dozens of other Somali refugees in the U.S. have been convicted of providing material support to overseas terrorist organizations.



WND reported last week that Chobani’s billionaire Muslim CEO has been working with the federal government to import refugees to work in his massive yogurt plant in Twin Falls.  They are trying to educate their state and local representatives about how the refugee resettlement program actually works, including the high welfare usage of refugees, the costs of educating children who speak zero English and the risks to national security.  Under the resettlement program, as governed by the Refugee Act of 1980 (authored by former Sens. Teddy Kennedy and Joe Biden), local elected leaders are not afforded any control over the number of refugees the federal government sends into their communities. One group, Soft Landing Montana, is affiliated with the International Rescue Committee or IRC, which is one of nine major contractors the U.S. government pays to resettle refugees.   “I have a problem with people who come here as immigrants or refugees and do not assimilate. They do not want to assimilate. I would have never thought that this little part of Brussels where we used to shop would be a place where terrorists hide in a no-go zone. The younger generation of Muslims, they do not want to assimilate, and I think there are forces pushing these young people (into jihad).”


When British, French, and German leaders begin to say that immigrants and their children must assimilate and that those who join ISIS may? lose their citizenship, it’s time to sit up and take notice.  Of course, however, these leaders must follow their new rhetoric with actual policies.



Likewise, with Obama’s promise the U.S. “will not relent,” Hodges said, “What his super-intel is saying is that Obama will continue to relent, doing nothing of real consequence, in fact accepting the ISIS attacks as normal.  “Indeed, he has constructed a new normal by failing to protect America, a stance which he has totally rationalized. In fact, he remains totally submissive to ISIS.”    Hodges has helped pioneer work on the brilliant unconscious mind, which he explained in his 1994 book, “The Deeper Intelligence.”


Islam’s Muhammad: The White 'Prophet' with Black Slaves



Even Muslim websites acknowledge that “Islam” means “submission” [to Allah], that it comes from the Arabic root “aslama” meaning submission, and that “Islam” is in the command form of that verb.  That’s why “Muslim” means “One who submits,” not “One who is peaceful.”  Obama: “Jefferson and John Adams had their own copies of the Quran.”  The reason Jefferson had a copy of the Quran was to try to understand it in light of what the Muslim ambassador from Tripoli had told him and John Adams. When asked why Tripoli pirates were attacking American ships and enslaving Americans, the Muslim ambassador explained that Muslims are commanded to do so by the Quran: “It was written in their Quran that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman [Muslim] who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to Paradise.”  That’s why Jefferson and Adams had Qurans.


Nearly one year ago to the day, “Obama’s Fictional History About Islam and the Crusades” was published in response to Obama’s false remarks about Christianity, the Crusades, and Islam– at a national prayer breakfast. Around the same time Obama refused to aid Jordan in its fight against ISIS– modern-day Islamic crusaders.  This year, Obama continues to import Islamist “Syrian refugees” who admit they hate America, who are also modern-day crusaders. And he recently announced even more buffoonery at a terrorist-connected Islamic Center in Baltimore.  Obama’s lies about Islam, denial of historical facts and invention of entirely fictional ones continue. Contrary to Obama’s claims, historical facts reveal that Islam has never been a friend of America. Ever.  The early Americans knew full well world history, which meant they were well aware that their new enemy had been invading the West since the 7th Century.  The Barbary Pirates had been attacking the West since the 13th Century and began attacking American ships after the War of Independence. Algerian Dey Muhammad declared war on the United States, creating a catalyst for two separate wars America fought against Tripoli (1801-1805) and Algiers (1815-1816).



they see their tax dollars being used, with the authorization of a Republican Congress, to fund what is a national suicide and few of their elected officials battling to stop the Obama administration.   In 2016, Republicans in Congress will need to demonstrate that they share that urgency by using every power at their disposal to slow Obama’s roll. Wait ‘til next year may be a great slogan for the Chicago Cubs, but when your country is being deliberately destroyed by an unchecked President, it is unacceptable.

And in this new political world being carved by Donald Trump and Ted Cruz failure to fight is not an option.



Former CIA official Dr. Peter Pry warns, "There is an imminent threat from ISIS to the national electric grid and not just to a single U.S. city." Dr. Pry says that attacks on just 9 of the nation's 55,000 electrical substations could result in nationwide blackouts for up to 18 months.  the grid's vulnerability to physical, electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and cyber-attack by ISIS and other terrorist groups.  Without access to a generator, your fridge, electric range and microwave would be dead. All the food in your fridge and freezer would spoil.  Your well couldn't pump any fresh water into your house. And even if you don't have a well, a total grid failure means no fresh water to drink, cook, or clean with.  Veteran news anchor Ted Koppel just wrote a book called Lights Out that details this exact scenario. And CENTCOM General Lloyd Austin says, "It's not a question of if, it's a question of when."



After Turkish Daily Cumhuriyet Released Video Footage Of Weapons-Filled Syria-Bound Turkish Trucks, Paper’s Editor-In-Chief, Ankara Bureau Chief Are Imprisoned, Charged With Treason, Espionage, And Terrorism

On November 26, 2015, Can Dundar, prominent journalist and editor-in-chief of Turkey’s oldest dailyCumhuriyet, and Erdem Gul, its Ankara bureau chief, were arrested; they are now being held in isolation pending a trial initiated by Erdogan himself, on charges of espionage, treason, and providing support for terrorism.




Only a small number of studies of Syrian textbooks have been published, although they stop around 2003. Nonetheless, they give us a good picture of what Syrians who may soon be our neighbors were taught for decades.  According to one of the most cited studies, Prof. Joshua Landis at University of Oklahoma found that the Syrian textbooks do not malign Christians, unlike those of other Arab countries. However, Jews – not Israel – are singled out for contempt and extermination. A tenth grade text book teaches: “The logic of justice requires the application of a single inescapable verdict on the Jews; namely, that their criminal intentions be turned against them and that they be eliminated.”  All other religions are treated even more poorly. Landis’ summary: “Islam accepts only two choices for pagans: that they convert to Islam or be killed.”  The psychological community has similar exams that pick up on antisocial traits, deceit, paranoia, elitism, narcissistic qualities, ethnocentric delusions and other characteristics which would make some candidates excellent choices for admission, and others less so. That kind of screening, alongside medical evaluation, should serve as the cornerstone of the process.



Islamic doctrine (which commands death for homosexuals) and public persecution aside, many of us have considered and discussed the Muslim proclivity for pedophilia and pederasty, despite liberals’ contention that we’re big fat meanies if we do so. The point is that stating there’s a Muslim proclivity for buggery exists is a truism.  Further evidence: Recent treatises crafted by imams which advocate or condone male rape in the case of conquered enemies and prisoners in war, this being a symbolic, humiliating gesture calculated to “make a woman out of them” (being a woman itself carrying a negative connotation in the Islamic world). The ISIS (Islamic State) terror group has also been known to “initiate” young males into the group by repeatedly sodomizing them.  One may recall a scene in the biographical film “Lawrence of Arabia” when T.E. Lawrence is captured, beaten and then raped by a Turkish officer, although the rape is merely suggested due to the cinematic standards of the day. Last year, the press – well, some press – reported on the outrage of U.S. servicemen in Afghanistan who had been told by their superiors to ignore their Afghani allies’ practice of sodomizing young boys. Some of their testimony was both heartbreaking and nauseating.  Thus, it would seem that in Islam, the adult male who happens to possess this inordinate fixation with other mens’ rectums could successfully play the role of the socially conservative, patriarchal Islamic man quite easily. He might marry, grudgingly attending to his wife or wives for their value as chambers of offspring gestation – which most Muslim men appear to favor doing anyway – while relying on other men or boys for their sexual release. As long as he didn’t actually cop to being a homosexual, or was demonstrably so, he’d have little to fear.  A certain 44th U.S. President might be springing to mind right about now…


Stacy Harp, who has attended as  undercover spy several pro-homose xual political conferences in recent years.
Without fail these groups have several "child education" (i.e. recruiting) booths that either hint toward or openly advocate for adult gay sex with children.  The illegal pedophilia movement dovetails with or stands on the fringes of the homose xual movement, often without rebuke from their own.  Stacy Harp explains the criminal elements of this movement.
Watch!  Dr. Chaps interviews Stacy Harp, undercover spy against the LGBT pedophile movement-->



(the love of money)  The 700 Club” host told viewers Monday he recently received a booklet from Yale entitled “Reading the Quran as a Law Book.” The document was written after Joseph Lowry, an associate professor from the University of Pennsylvania, gave a lecture at the school Aug. 25.  “This follows Yale’s decision to create a Center for Islamic Law and Civilization after a Saudi businessman gave a $10 million donation to the law school,” Robertson said. “The dean says, and I quote, ‘Islamic law has a long and proud tradition, which encompasses great intellectual achievements.’   Robertson asked Sleiman how Lowry would explain Shariah law, which “has to do with the subjugation of women. It has to do with a husband having the privilege of beating his wife. It has to do with beheadings.”  When Yale tries to basically endorse or apply the laws, then there will be no separation between the state and Islam.”


Americans again name government as the top problem facing the United States, according to a new Gallup poll.

The economy came in second with 13 percent. Unemployment tied for third, with immigration at 8 percent. The result landed immigration in the top four problems for the first time since 2007.



(Owebummer—the Food Stamp President.  All bills should stand on their own and be subject to prioritization & budgeting)  Separate agricultural programs from the food stamp program.  Food stamps account for about 80 percent of the farm bill costs, making “food stamp bill” a more accurate title than the “farm bill.”  From a policy perspective, separation should be noncontroversial, and it has been widely supported. Unfortunately, food stamps and agricultural programs have been combined for political reasons in order to simply  get “something” passed.   The House separated the programs in 2013 when it passed a separate agriculture-only bill and a food stamp bill. Even when the House combined the programs back together in one bill for conference (to work out differences with the Senate farm bill), it authorized agricultural programs for five years and food stamps for three years. This different authorization schedule would have helped to ensure that the programs be considered separately in the future.  If agricultural policy is important, why in the world should the central piece of agricultural policy legislation (i.e., the farm bill) bury farm programs in a food stamp bill? On the same lines, if food stamps are so important, why should this program not get the full attention of Congress when it is to be reauthorized?


http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-on-the-right/010616-788493-homeless-victimized-by-their-right-to-live-on-street.htm#ixzz3x4Hs0rJ4 Last fall, a federal court in Boise, Idaho, let police clear an encampment of vagrants — an Obamaville — and move them into a shelter, over the objections of the Justice Department. DOJ argued people have a "right" to sleep on the street if there are no shelter beds. Boise proved there are beds, many still unused after the clean-up.  Unfortunately, the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is squelching Los Angeles' efforts to halt vagrancy. This court has ruled that homeless have a "right" to sleep in their cars and store their possessions on the sidewalk when shelter space is lacking.  It's the left's tolerance for homelessness as a lifestyle — our public safety and quality of life be damned. Not just vagrants are victims.  Sunday night a McDonald's worker got stabbed to death in the Bronx by a homeless man heading to the restaurant's bathroom. And a midtown steak house is reporting a 24% drop in business because of a homeless encampment outside. Victims of a city's warped progressive ideology.  From New York to Los Angeles, businesses are intimidated and law abiding residents are harassed and threatened by street dwellers, abetted by an army of progressive lawyers and the Obama administration.



(EPA must be defunded & moved down to the States.)  Twenty-five states (and four state agencies) are petitioning the Supreme Court to halt the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Clean Power Plan, after the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to stay the rule last week. The states described the Clean Power Plan “as the most far reaching and burdensome rule EPA has ever forced onto the states.”  Regardless of the final decision in the courts, Congress should act.  A group of unelected bureaucrats in the EPA are attempting to completely re-engineer the nation’s electricity source based on one criterion—carbon dioxide emissions—rather than looking at safety, affordability, reliability, or other considerations.  Though it’s easily taken for granted, affordable, reliable electricity is invaluable to Americans’ jobs, homes, and well-being. Such an impactful decision at the very least belongs with the peoples’ representatives in Congress.




The Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, but is, in fact, the latest and most dangerous face of a web of well-funded communist/socialist organizations that have been agitating against America for decades. Its agitation has provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. If allowed to continue, that agitation could devolve into anarchy and civil war. The BLM crowd appears to be spoiling for just such an outcome.  Nevertheless, BLM appears to be exercising considerable leverage over the Democratic Party, in part by pressuring and intimidating Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (VT) into embracing their cause. The movement could also assist President Obama’s exploitation of racial divisions in society beyond his final term in office.



So much of Hollywood is agenda-driven.  Liberals talk about how bad it is to objectify women, and yet films are filled with objectified women. Liberal Hollywood types support more gun control but have their own armed security and perform in films with hordes of gun violence scenes.   The NBA is dominated by tall black men. “According to racial equality activist Richard Lapchick, the NBA in 2011 was composed of 83 percent non-white players, including 78 percent black, four percent Latino, and one percent Asian; 17 percent of the players were white. The league had the highest percentage of black players of any major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada.” It’s about the same for the NFL.



Liberal Professors Outnumber Conservative Faculty 5 to 1

In 2014, 60 percent of professors identified as “liberal” or “far left,” according to the Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA, as reported by The Washington Post’s “Wonkblog.” Compare that with 1990 survey data, when only 42 percent said the same.  Daniel Klein, a professor of economics at George Mason University, said the reported 5-to-1 ratio is “not very meaningful” because the terms “liberal” and “conservative” have become “exceedingly troubled.”  Instead, Klein predicted that the imbalance between faculty who vote Democratic compared with those who vote Republican is closer to 9 to 1 or even 10 to 1.   And although a prescriptive fix to obtain greater balance won’t happen on its own, Klein said, “donors, students and parents should vote with their dollars, and voters should vote with their votes against pouring taxpayer money into a leftist apparatus.



The federal government funds “Trade Adjustment Assistance” benefits for workers who lose their job to foreign trade. The program includes generous federal subsidies and free job training. You might expect this to improve displaced workers’ incomes. But when Mathematica evaluated the program, it found participants made $27,000 less than workers outside the program.  Congress should think carefully before creating another federal job training program. They could easily wind up hurting the workers they want to help.  Obama’s remarks tonight reaffirmed what everyone already knew: that there is no strategy to defeat ISIS and he cannot wait to pass the buck to his successor.  what Obama claims to be his “smarter” approach has led to disasters in Libya, Syria and Yemen, to name but three.  Rather than leaving energy choices to American families and businesses, “we” has consistently meant forcing taxpayers to subsidize politically preferred energy technologies.


We have one job this year, and that’s to fund the government in a responsible, thoughtful, and constitutional manner,” said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. “If we are here next year having just passed an omnibus, that is an F-minus [for Ryan]. If we pass 12 appropriations bills and stand our ground and force the Senate to face these issues, that’s an A.”  Conservatives cheered a repeal vote of Obamacare Wednesday as a good first step, but they have a long list of action items.  “We need to show how we are different than the Democrats,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, the Freedom Caucus chairman.



Republicans who want a national market for health insurance, without federal regulation of health insurance:  The Federation of State Medical Boards has established an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, which now has 12 states signed up, and legislation pending in six more. This follows the Interstate Nurse Licensure Compact and the Physical Therapy Licensure Compact. What these compacts achieve is a national market for health professionals, because the professionals do not have to spend time and money earning licenses in each state. With respect to insurance, the Interstate Insurance Product Regulatory Commission was established in 2006, and covers life insurance, annuities, disability income, and long-term care insurance. According to the commission: “In an increasingly mobile society, these are products that have a long life and will travel with people as they move across state lines.” That is what we want for health insurance, too. The emerging House Republican health reform plan would benefit significantly from Mr. Upton’s proposal to allow states to establish a health insurance compact.



A trio of Republicans, Reps. Brad Klippert, Tom Dent and Dan Griffey, introduced a bill that requires that a person’s DNA be used to determine what facilities they are and aren’t allowed to use.   Rep. Graham Hunt, a conservative from Orting, Wash., wants to ban anyone from using public facilities opposite from his or her anatomical sex unless that person has undergone sex-reassignment surgery.    “I’ve tried to make this about the genitalia,” Hunt told The Daily Signal. “If you don’t have the parts … if you don’t have the plumbing, then you don’t go in.”   Citing statistics that say less than one percent of the American population is transgender, Flores asked, “Why are the 99 percent having to change our whole way of doing things for less than one percent?”  Since sharing her story on The Federalist, Triller Haver said she’s heard from “hundreds” of other sexual assault victims who share her concerns with the new policies.



Citing student privacy rights, the South Dakota Senate this week passed a bill that would prohibit students at public elementary and secondary schools from using bathrooms, lockers, and shower rooms that don’t match their biological sex. The bill, however, also requires reasonable accommodation of students who identify as transgender through the provision of alternate facilities if requested.  The Senate passed the bill with a 20-15 vote on Tuesday after the state House of Representatives voted in favor of it on Jan. 27. It now awaits Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard’s signature to become law.   The bill defines biological sex as “the physical condition of being male or female as determined by a person’s chromosomes and anatomy as identified at birth.”

If a student, with the consent of his parent, reports that his gender identity does not conform with his biological sex, a “reasonable accommodation” must be made as long as it does not cause “undue hardship” on a school district.

“A reasonable accommodation may include a single-occupancy restroom, a unisex restroom, or the controlled use of a restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by faculty,” reads the bill.  “This is a commonsense bill that protects the rights and interests of all students,” said Ryan T. Anderson, the William E. Simon fellow at The Heritage Foundation.



Responsibility rather than hedonism. Care for yourself and your baby rather than selfishness. These are the values we must impart on women of all ages.  The birth control pill is not the panacea these governmental bozos think it is. However, chastity before marriage is!  Let’s hear it for common sense! Protect yourself from getting pregnant by practicing self-control, people! That way nobody is hurt physically, psychologically, or spiritually.





In adopting negative interest rates Japan is reaching for a new weapon in its long battle against deflation, which since the 1990s have discouraged consumers from buying big because they expect prices to fall further. Deflation is seen as the root of two decades of economic malaise.  Kuroda said the world's third-biggest economy was recovering moderately and the underlying price trend was rising steadily.


And just this month, joining the European Central Bank, Denmark and Sweden with negative interest rates at the central bank level is the Bank of Japan, which just went negative, too.  Now, the Japanese 10-year treasury is testing 0 percent, a threshold it already crossed once on Feb. 9, just days after the Bank of Japan’s announcement. On Friday, it was at 0.013 percent. The implication of negative rates, not just on excess reserves, but also the discount window, is that banks will get paid to borrow from the Fed.  Should the deposit rate go negative, depositors will be charged to save money.   Well, when you want less of something, you tax it. And taxing investors for holding dollars via negative interest rates creates a disincentive for holding them for very long — or at all.  But the real risk is that instead of stimulating aggregate demand, negative rates actually encourage investors and foreigners to get out of dollar-denominated assets like U.S. treasuries. It would encourage institutions to start trading with something that actually has a positive yield, instead of paying for the privilege of merely engaging in commerce.

Would you consider sponsoring "The Shoe That Grows" for two, five, 10 or even 20 impoverished kids and help meet their practical footwear needs for up to five years? Go here to see this amazing shoe and help make a difference in the lives of needy kids right nowPlease note that your tax-deductible contribution goes directly to Because International and will immediately be put to work to help needy kids.


Just google Surgery Center of Oklahoma and here is what you will find. For Achilles tendon repair, you will pay $5,730. That’s not an estimate with a huge variance around it. It’s a package price that includes doctor, nurse, anesthesia, room, drugs, supplies – everything.  How refreshing, therefore, to find a hospital that quotes package prices in advance and is willing to compete for patients based on price and quality. Why are they doing it? For the simplest reason of all: to attract patients.  Five years ago, Dr. Smith was frustrated. His surgery center had the best surgeons, the best outcomes and the lowest prices (sometimes by as much as 80 percent). His lobby should have been packed. Patients should have been beating down his door. But they weren’t. In fact, the patient flow was stagnant. He was outperforming his competitors, yet no one knew it. So, Dr. Smith started posting his prices online, while at the same time calling his center “free market-loving, price-displaying and state-of-the-art.”



New Hampshire has consequences.  A Granite State defeat by Sen. Estes Kefauver ended Harry Truman's bid for re-election in 1952. Lyndon Johnson's narrow write-in victory over Sen. Eugene McCarthy, 49-42, brought Bobby Kennedy into the race -- and LBJ's withdrawal two weeks later.  George H. W. Bush's unimpressive New Hampshire win in 1992 brought Ross Perot in as a third-party candidate two days later, and Bob Dole's loss in 1996 portended defeat in the general election.  But if a cloud is forming over the Clinton campaign, the sun continues to shine on The Donald.




(Owebummer & Democraps coddle terrorists & dictators; weak on our enemies, hard on our allies..)  North Korean leader Kim Jong-un asserted last month that his country had built a hydrogen nuclear bomb to “defend its sovereignty and the dignity of the nation.” Kim’s initial assertion about hydrogen bombs was met with expert skepticism, and it is more likely that Pyongyang has achieved a boosted fission rather than a fusion bomb. Such a weapon would be larger than its first three nuclear tests (and the 1945 U.S. atomic weapons) but not of the magnitude of a hydrogen fusion bomb.  If confirmed, North Korea’s fourth nuclear test is a dangerous development. Coupled with ongoing development of several different missile systems, North Korea poses an increasing and direct threat to the United States, South Korea, and Japan.  Experts estimate that Pyongyang currently has 10-16 nuclear weapons with potentially as many as 50-100 by 2020. North Korea has likely already achieved warhead miniaturization, the ability to place nuclear weapons on its medium-range missiles, and a preliminary ability to reach the continental United States with a missile.   Washington should immediately request a U.N. Security Council meeting to produce a new resolution to impose stronger punitive sanctions and close loopholes, such as including Article 42 of Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, which allows for enforcement by military means. Washington should call upon all U.N. member nations to fully implement existing sanctions to hinder North Korea’s procurement and export of missile-related and WMD-related items.  In addition to U.N. actions, Washington should augment U.S. sanctions. President Barack Obama’s assertion that North Korea is the most heavily sanctioned country in the world is simply not true. The Obama administration has not fully implemented U.S. laws and has targeted fewer North Korean entities than those of the Balkans, Burma, Cuba, Iran, and Zimbabwe. The U.S. should target financial and regulatory measures against any government, financial, or business entity assisting North Korean nuclear, missile, and conventional arms; criminal activities; money laundering; or import of luxury goods.  North Korea’s nuclear test is a serious and irreparable violation of numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions.


According to the Associated Press, the recently launched North Korean satellite Kwangmyongsong, or "Shining Star," soared over the San Fransisco Bay area in close proximity to Super Bowl 50 on Sunday night.  (they can hit us with a nuclear weapon, thank weak and pathetic Bill Clinton)


(Liar in Chief)  Back in 2007, when candidate Barack Obama was wowing the left’s opinion mavens with his supposedly intellectually rigorous foreign policy plans, he treated North Korea and Iran as identical challenges.  In his much-celebrated article in Foreign Affairs magazine that year, then-Sen. Obama wrote: “We must develop a strong international coalition to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and eliminate North Korea’s nuclear weapons program” because “Iran and North Korea could trigger regional arms races, creating dangerous nuclear flashpoints in the Middle East and East Asia.”  How? “Our first measure must be sustained, direct, and aggressive diplomacy — the kind that the Bush administration has been unable and unwilling to use.”  The president, who in 2007 promised that his untried diplomatic skills would denuclearize both North Korea and Iran, had by 2016 substantially escalated both of these fanatical terrorist powers’ atomic threats to America.



Bronze Star Marine Corps veteran Christopher Marquez was the victim of a brutal beating at a Washington D.C. McDonald’s when several African American individuals approached Marquez at the fast-food restaurant, asking him if “black lives matter.”  Now The Washington Times is reporting that two arrests have been made:  “The male teen was charged with aggravated assault and the female was charged with robbery. Police are still looking for a third suspect involved in the assault.”  Marquez has mixed feeling about the arrests, and some strong words for President Obama, telling The Daily Caller:  “I am glad two suspects have been arrested, but I am deeply disappointed they have not been charged with a hate crime yet. Not prosecuting this as a hate crime will only encourage more hate crimes against white people and create further division in this great country….



Another crime in a gun free zone.  New York police are looking for five men who forced a father at gunpoint to leave his daughter behind so they could take turns raping her, according to a press release.  The 18-year-old female was with her father at the Osborn Playground in Brooklyn around 9 p.m. Thursday when they were approached by five men, according to a press release from the NYPD. One of the men pulled a gun on the father and daughter and demanded that the father leave the area, the press release said.Then each of the five suspects raped the teenager, according to the NYPD. "The father returned a short time later with two uniformed police officers," the press release said. The suspects then quickly fled the park and evaded police capture.  So when people say they need more police protection do the mean they want the police to investigate after they have been killed, raped, or otherwise victimized? Obama-Democraps never weep for the many people who die because they have been disarmed by their own government.  Socialism is always about depriving society of its natural abilities to deal with the peoples' needs on the basis of the empty promise that the government can do it better. Gun control is just part of the socialist vision.


In fact, the field of mental health itself is communist in origin and seeks to dominate human behavior with the goal of conditioning people to accept servitude.  Communists do not believe in the same values as Americans do. To them the idea of traditional family, individualism and patriotism are signs of a sick individual because they do not align with collective goals of the state.  The tenets of rugged individualism, personal determination, self-will, imagination, and personal creativeness are alike in the masses antipathetic to the good of the greater state. These willful and unaligned forces are no more than illnesses which will bring about disaffection, disunity, and at length, the collapse of the group to which the individual is attached.” (Beria, pp. 9)  This is an alarming quote as the Obama administration seeks to use mental health as a means of disarming the population and eradicating the Second Amendment. Furthermore, the idea of rugged individualism and free-will are the values that this country was founded on.


The Los Angeles Police Protective League – the labor union for the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) – warned residents that they’d better “be able to protect themselves,” because of long police response times resulting from being understaffed.  In San Bernardino a few years ago, city attorney Jim Penman stated in a city council meeting that residents will need to lock their doors and load their guns because of police budget cuts.



Americans should be alarmed at the prospect of forced mental health screenings because mental health issues are used as a means of gaining coercive control over those that oppose state goals. In fact, the field of mental health itself is communist in origin and seeks to dominate human behavior with the goal of conditioning people to accept servitude.  This is an alarming quote as the Obama administration seeks to use mental health as a means of disarming the population and eradicating the Second Amendment.

Help GOA elect strong pro-gun candidates like Ted Cruz.  Contribute here.  Who this nation puts in the Oval Office this year is crucial, as it will have a tremendous impact upon our Second Amendment rights.  Consider the Supreme Court.  Hillary Clinton has already stated that, if elected, Barack Obama would be a good nominee for the Supreme Court!  This is especially scary when you consider that the next President could appoint four Justices.  Ted Cruz has the legal background to protect the Constitution.  As Solicitor General of Texas, he drafted the amicus brief in the famous Heller case that was signed by 31 state attorneys general.  This was the case where the Supreme Court conclusively stated that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.  After being elected to the U.S. Senate, Cruz went toe-to-toe against anti-gun Sen. Dianne Feinstein and embarrassed her -- exposing her ignorance on the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment.  Senator Cruz also helped lead the attack to defeat every gun control proposal offered in the U.S. Senate in 2013, when the President tried to use the Sandy Hook tragedy to implement a draconian gun control agenda.  Ted Cruz is not a recent convert to the pro-gun position.  He is solidly pro-gun -- and is 100 percent pro-Constitution.  Of course, I certainly recognize that some gun owners are supporting other candidates.  Our endorsement of Ted Cruz does NOT in any way disparage the other pro-gun candidates -- in fact we have worked closely on legislative matters with Senators who are in the presidential race.  But GOA endorsed Cruz because we believe he has the strongest pro-gun and constitutional record -- as indicated in our endorsement statement last year.  “The first thing I intend to do as President is rescind every single illegal and unconstitutional executive action taken by Barack Obama.” -- Ted Cruz, February 2, 2016


(Democraps: SOFT ON CRIMINALS--HARD ON LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS)  At a time when Baltimore broke its annual homicide record and Chicago has returned to the days of Capone with eleven murders in the first week of the new year, a bi-partisan supported criminal justice reform measure would put a Republican rubber stamp on the release of thousands of major drug dealers back onto the streets from which they were forcibly removed.  Obama is drastically increasing Justice Department staff to handle the expected massive increase in pardons and clemency that the President is expected to issue beyond the 40,000 plus convicts he began releasing starting in Oct. 2015.  And into this mix, Congress is trying to pass legislation, which the President will sign, that retroactively cuts mandatory sentences of those still serving time in the federal penitentiary.  This might make sense if federal prisons were overrun with people who were caught up, arrested and convicted of simple possession of drugs charges.  But that is not the case, in fact, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission as of the end of 2014, only 15 U.S. citizens were serving in federal prison for “simple possession,” and most were likely plead down from more serious charges.



Finally after all the insanity resulting from gun control advocates willfully lying to the police in the hope that they accidentally kill a law abiding citizen, federal lawmakers are stepping in to actually make these “pranks” a crime.  Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA) Rep. Katherine Clark 14% ×

(D-MA) recently introduced the Interstate Swatting Hoax Act.



The brutal Columbus, Ohio murder of Erveena Hammonds and her 7 and 10 year-old daughters, whose throats were slit by an early-released felon, is exhibit A of why Congress should reject legislation designed to let thousands more convicted drug criminals out of federal prison prematurely.  If Congress had not enacted the so-called 2010 Fair Sentencing Act, Wendell Callahan would still be in jail and Erveena Hammonds and her two daughters, Breya and Anaesia, would still be alive.  The tragedy of a felon who got almost four years knocked off his sentence re-entering the life of his former girlfriend and violently ending it was sadly predictable. A multi-year 30 state study on the recidivism of more than 400,000 felons released in 2005 showed that unfortunately 75 percent of those released re-entered the criminal justice system and 25 percent of the crimes were violent.  Simply stated, if Congress passes the mass criminal release bill that is being considered under the auspices of ‘reform’ Erveena Hammond and her two girls will not be the last to die due to Congressional prisoner reprieves.


"Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture but ... after a shooting, the problem is the gun?" In other words, after a shooting, it is the gun, an inanimate object, that is the culprit, but after a bombing, it is not the bomb that receives the blame but the evil individual. In both cases it is the evil individual who is to blame.

Ronald Reagan had it right when he said, "We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions."  Speaking of guns, the letter has a 1950s photo of high school girls at an indoor shooting range. The photo caption states: "Back in the 1950s and even later, many high schools had shooting ranges. Students even brought their own rifles to school." It asks, "What changed in society that we could trust such activities then, but not now?"   Have guns become more evil or have people become more evil?  "Get it straight: Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC ... are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements. Social Security and Veterans Benefits are 'Entitlements' because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients."



Pinera says that Clinton began thinking in earnest about privatizing part of Social Security back in 1995, after a discussion with former Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm, an ardent advocate for Social Security reform and, like Clinton, a moderate Democrat.

According to Pinera, Clinton saw private accounts as a way to cement his presidential record as a reformer. And the model for doing so that he had in mind was from Chile, where Pinera and a group of reformers created private retirement accounts that helped fuel that nation’s decade-long growth boom. It was a rousing success.  Clinton even sent his former chief of staff, Mack McLarty, to Chile in 1996 to see how private personal accounts worked. In a letter to Pinera, he talked about how impressive Chile’s program was, calling it “the mother of all reforms,” adding: “We can learn a great deal from your country’s bold initiative, which is widely envied throughout the hemisphere.”  Three years later, in December 1998, Pinera attended a White House conference on Social Security reform. There, he outlined the simple elements of the Chilean Model: “Every Chilean worker has a pension passbook — I always carry one of them.   Just one month later, in his 1999 State of the Union address, he proposed what he called “USA accounts,” universal savings accounts funded by about 11% of the then-Social Security surplus as a means of taking pressure off the Social Security program, which was even then approaching insolvency. Every American would have had a private savings account, funded by a portion of his or her payroll taxes.  “USA accounts will help all Americans to share in our nation’s wealth and to enjoy a more secure retirement,” Clinton said. And he was right.  But it was not to be. Clinton’s involvement in the Monica Lewinsky scandal and his subsequent impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice derailed his plans. Despite being found not guilty, his reputation was in tatters. He never recovered, and his entire final-year agenda for his presidency went by the wayside — a victim of his own insatiable appetites.  When Bush proposed private accounts in 2005, Democrats opposed it.  Sadly, we’re paying a price for that. Today, a mere six months after Social Security’s 80th anniversary, the program is insolvent.


people shoot people, and going after guns will not stop violence.   One of the greatest threats to our nation’s security and to our ongoing fight against violent crime is an open and porous southern border. The border between the U.S. and Mexico is controlled by criminal cartels that regularly smuggle narcotics, weapons, contraband, and people into the United States.   The president has chosen to ignore a significant security threat, and now, instead of funding more border patrol agents, his executive order calls for the hiring of 200 more ATF agents to investigate the sale of firearms to U.S. citizens.  ISIS and al-Qaeda have clearly stated that they would exploit our refugee resettlement program as a way to infiltrate jihadists into our nation. Congress recently passed legislation that would have halted this program, but, once again, Congress did something the president didn’t like, so he ignored Congress and continued at full speed resettling refugees into our states.  One of our greatest vulnerabilities is the lack of effort the administration is putting into curbing the radicalization of America’s youth by extreme Islamic terrorist organizations.  by his inaction on securing our borders, ignoring terrorists’ threats to infiltrate our nation, and redirecting law enforcement and national security resources to advance a political agenda, he has proven that his plan is not to make America safer.   Mr. President, if you want to protect the American people, then secure our borders, stop the influx of refugees coming to our states from terrorist-controlled nations, and remove the bureaucratic hurdles keeping our TSA from implementing the technology they need. This would be a legacy worth pursuing.


In a peer-to-peer, private firearms transaction, it is already illegal to sell a firearm to another individual if the seller “knows or has reasonable cause to believe” that the buyer meets any of the prohibited categories for possession of a firearm (felon, fugitive, illegal alien, etc.).  Local, state, and federal law enforcement are often present both in uniform and/or covertly in plain clothes to monitor and intervene in suspected unlawful firearms sales such as straw purchasing; purchases made by prohibited individuals, including non-residents; and the attempted sale of any illegal firearms.   An individual can pay for the firearm over the Internet at websites and online sporting goods retailers. The firearm, however, must be picked up from a federal firearms licensee, such as a gun store. In many cases, this is the brick-and-mortar store associated with the website where the gun purchase was made. Once at the retail store, the Internet purchaser must then fill out the requisite forms, including ATF Form 4473, which initiates the NICS background check process. Thus, an Internet purchase of a firearm from a firearms retailer requires a background check.  The Obama administration has used its limited criminal enforcement resources to focus on clemency for convicted and imprisoned felons, the investigation of police departments, and civil rights cases.  Criminals, however, obtain firearms in myriad illegal ways, including home invasion robbery; trading narcotics for firearms; burglary of homes, vehicles, and businesses; and straw purchasing.



If you decide to commit violent crimes against law-abiding residents, expect to be shot.  That’s the message Polk County, Florida, Sheriff Grady Judd had for his community after a home invader was dispatched by an armed homeowner.  Via My News 13 in Lakeland, Florida:



The Chicago Tribune reports, "10 days into new year, more than 100 people shot in Chicago."  Notice also that after gun control comes speech control. The logic of the statement is that if we didn't have social media we wouldn't have the problem of gang violence.  I would like to know how often the average violent criminal gets caught in Chicago and how often a violent criminal who is caught sees the inside of prison. It seems these gang members don't fear the consequences of breaking the law. Are there any?


My name is Lily Tang Williams from Douglas County. I am here to represent Our America Initiative, a non-profit grassroots organization, Libertarian Party of Colorado and myself to strongly support SB15-175 Repeal Magazine Ban. I was born and grew up in People’s Republic of China, where the Communist Party rules everything. Chinese citizens are not allowed to have any guns ever since the Communist party took over in 1949. So, Chinese people are left helpless when they need to defend themselves. I grew up with fear like millions of other children. Fear police will pound our doors at night for no good reason (search warrant is not necessary for them to do that), fear bad guys will come to rob us (there were crimes in our poor neighborhood), fear my parents and brothers would get hurt and taken away.  Guns do not kill people, tyranny kills millions and millions of people. I lived under tyranny for 24 years, I do not want to ever live under it again.



What are the leading causes of death (abortion is not included and there isn’t a breakdown on gang/gun or criminal/gun violence)?  In 2011, five major causes of death (heart disease, cancer, chronic lower respiratory diseases, stroke, and accidents) accounted for 62% of all deaths in the United States (1). However, this general profile of leading causes varies substantially based on a decedent's age.  The five leading causes of death for those aged 1–24 years include external causes (i.e., accidents, homicide, and suicide), followed by cancer and heart disease (Figure 4).


Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979, suicide: 41,149, Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557


Expanded Homicide Data Table 8   Murder Victims by Weapon, 2007–2011

Handguns, Knives or cutting instruments, Personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.) Knives or cutting instruments


Murder by State, Types of Weapons, 2011


I recently had the privilege of interviewing an "unsung hero" of the pro-life movement, activist Joseph Mortone, who has rescued 150 babies from abortion by peaceful persuasion using specific techniques outside of Planned Parenthood.  Watch!  Dr. Chaps' interview (Part 1) with Joseph Mortone, pro-life activist-->  In this interview, you will learn real techniques used to save real children from the horrific crime of abortion-murder.  Joseph has learned from decades of trial and error, what works and what doesn't.


I was a Pastor, minding my own business.  Abortion was simply a word we debated, we discussed.  But it wasn't until I saw the graphic pictures of abortion where I literally saw little babies made in the image of God, torn apart.  It just broke my heart."
Watch!  Dr. Chaps' interview with Pro-Life Activist Rusty Thomas, the "no compromise" pro-life evangelist-->
Rusty has also helped persuade abortionists to stop their killing, by daring to publish their names and protest their crimes.
"We went to them privately, on several occasions, pleading with them to no longer murder babies made in the image of God.  So it wasn't just a public proclamation.or exposure.  We went privately, several times.  But we told them, if they did not stop privately, that we would publically expose what they're doing.  And if they're proud of killing children, then just consider us as free publicity."



Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore has issued an order directing state judges to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples until the full state Supreme Court can determine the scope of the US Supreme Court ruling in the Obergefell case redefining marriage and assess how it impacts their state constitutional provision defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.  Please stand with Chief Justice Moore in support of marriage, state rights, and the constitution by signing this petition.


George Washington made the conclusive assertion, "It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible."  Attorney, Statesman, and the famous gentleman that coined the phrase “give me liberty or give me death,” Patrick Henry made the claim, “The Bible is worth all the other books which have ever been printed.”  Recently, my friend and public servant, Chief Justice Roy Moore was willing to make a decision based solely on law, truth and conscience.


The United Kingdom declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group after an 18-month study ordered by British Prime Minister David Cameron…The report, which Cameron presented to the House of Commons on Thursday, described the Muslim Brotherhood as anti-democratic, openly supportive of terrorism, dedicated to establishing an Islamist government — and opposed to the rule of law, individual liberty, and equality.  "Aspects of the Muslim Brotherhood's ideology and activities … run counter to British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, equality and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs," Cameron said in a statement with the report's release. "The Muslim Brotherhood is not the only movement that promotes values which appear intolerant of equality and freedom of faith and belief."



The House of Representatives easily passed the end of year Omnibus $1.14 trillion spending bill, with strong Democrat support: nearly 100 GOP members voted against it.  The final vote for the bill was 316-133, (only 133 patriots worth keeping) which was stronger than anticipated. Republicans (Traitors who need to be voted out) backed it by a 150-95 margin, while the Democrats (Traitors who need to be voted out) gave it almost unanimous support with a 166-18 tally


The vote overwhelmingly passed the House with a total vote count of 359-67. Only three Democrats – Reps. Rush Holt (D-NJ), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), and Mike McIntyre (D-NC) – voted against it, while 64 Republicans did the same.  (only 64 keepers then, the rest must be voted out!)


The 2,009-page, $1.1 Trillion Consolidated Omnibus spending bill, which the Republican Congress approved and President Obama signed a week before Christmas, violates every promise that Republicans made to the voters who rewarded them with landslide victories in the 2010 and 2014 midterm elections. It’s no wonder that betrayed Republican voters have adopted a throw-the-bums-out attitude that supports the presidential campaigns of Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Dr. Ben Carson.  Although the current congressional leadership seems to have lost its will to fight for conservative policies, the 95 Representatives and 16 Senators who voted against the deal provide hope for building a more effective conservative majority next year. Our marvelous Constitution provides many ways for concerned citizens reduce the size of our government.



Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) is bringing together many of the most important economic riders into a single bill, The Article I Consolidated Appropriations Amendments of 2016, to keep these issues at the top of the agenda rather than losing the value of the hard work done last year to rein in President Obama's pen-and-phone approach to governance.  Among the dozens of policy riders and defunds incorporated into the act are a number of measures that would stop the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulatory onslaught against energy producers, mining and agriculture. Other measures would stop the Labor Department and National Labor Relations Board from becoming virtual proxies for Big Labor through various actions that attack the franchise and independent consultant business models, putting union reps into the middle of OSHA inspections at non-union companies, and ambush union elections.  The genius of the legislation is that a vast majority of the proposals contained within it have already been vetted through regular order processes, and passed by the House, giving the legislation an aura of consensus that every Republican should be able to rally round.  Buck argues that "By doing our work, House Republicans have laid out a counterbalance to President Obama's wholesale assault on free markets and individual liberties."



Politicians are selling a product, themselves, to you the voter. Become an informed voter and hold them accountable.



Which candidate matches you on the issues? Find out.




Ahead of "gun/gun violence" were such issues as: Congress, the economy, unemployment, immigration, terrorism, race relations, the federal budget deficit, healthcare, poverty and education.  According to Gallup, just one percent of those polled cited "guns/gun control" as a concern for most of 2015. The number rose to 7 percent in October and December following two mass shootings.  Still, for the second consecutive year, dissatisfaction with government beat the economy as the problem more Americans identified as the nation's top problem in 2015, according to Gallup.


Obama has already had more than 300 federal judges confirmed to the federal bench, about as many as his predecessor, George W. Bush.  Why are Senate Republicans giving any more judges to President Obama in his lame duck year when their goal should be to bottle up the remainder of the Obama agenda?   It is puzzling why the Senate Judiciary Committee continues to confirm Obama’s judicial appointments in light of the President’s continued abuse of power.


(Democrap Big Wasteful Government Socialism runs out of other peoples’ money..)  Puerto Rico will skip payments on some of its debt due Jan. 4, the island's second default this year, but will remain current on its most important debt, Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla said on Wednesday. When asked about the shutdown of key government services, Garcia Padilla told reporters at a press conference: "We have to do all we can to avoid that situation."  The U.S. Commonwealth, suffering from (too much wasteful big government spending) a near decade-long recession with a 45 percent poverty rate and a shrinking tax base due to people leaving the island, first defaulted in August when it failed to make the full payment on its Public Finance Corp (PFC) bonds.


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was clearly trying to "subvert the rules" when she asked aide Jake Sullivan in an email to turn a secure fax that wasn't transmitting into "nonpaper with no identifying information and send nonsecure," says The Washington Post's Bob Woodward.  The recently released email making the request is important, Woodward said on Fox News Sunday, "Because you have here the secretary of state in 2011 saying, 'Let's subvert the rules.' … It's very clear from the earlier emails that this was a security issue."



Congress will have a shorter session this year, making it difficult for legislators to pass all 12 appropriations bills individually—a feat that hasn’t been accomplished in over two decades.  In recent years, Congress has made a habit of approving government spending with a single vote. Instead of voting to fund individual agencies and programs one at a time, legislators bundle smaller appropriations bills into a single lump package.  Inside Washington, that massive legislation is known as the omnibus. Ryan calls it a “crap sandwich.”


The new hit movie "The Big Short," based on Michael Lewis' bestselling book, is an entertaining and suspenseful reenactment of all the breakdowns in the banking and housing industries that caused the financial world to go collectively mad and the many unsavory characters.  It brings back bad memories of how symbiotic relationships among auditors, credit rating agencies, banks and insurance companies created dastardly conflicts of interest.  I've never understood why auditors and credit rating agencies work for the financial institutions, not the investors.  The credit agencies were giving triple-A bond ratings to junk mortgage-backed securities without even examining the unpayable low down payment "NINJA" (no income, no job) loans in the portfolios. These ratings were handed out right up to the very eve of the crash.  The big banks kept buying more and more of these MBSes, even as the default rates were skyrocketing. Government regulators encouraged them to buy as many of these "safe" mortgages as possible to meet capital requirements.  "The Big Short" portrays well the infuriating dereliction of the auditors, the rating agencies, the mortgage originators, the bankers, the securitizers — and, yes, the homebuyers too.   Where the movie falls short is its moralizing at the end. It portrays "capitalism" and "greed" as the villains.  But the real insanity of the bubble is that so few of the people who made financially reckless decisions went bankrupt.   Capitalism doesn't work if the government provides a trampoline-sized safety net for those who take risks that don't pay off. By encouraging the breakdown of due diligence and underwriting standards, bailouts create bubbles.  "The Big Short" also neglects to even once mention the worst actors of all in the financial meltdown: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These two government-run institutions lost $150 billion of taxpayer money by securitizing mortgages and providing near 100% guarantees on repayment.  Also never mentioned was that GOVERNMENT first caused the erosion of sound lending practices through the Community Reinvestment Act. The politicians kept pushing the banks to make riskier loans to lower-income borrowers in the name of "fairness."  The insanity continues in part because no one has learned the right lessons from 2008. Regrettably, "The Big Short" doesn't teach them.

Over 94% of AAA-rated subprime tranches experienced no losses at all.  While it was certainly not apparent at the time of the crisis, the overwhelming majority of subprime MBS performed as rated. Sen. Sander's assertion that the rating agencies knew their ratings were "bogus" is simply inconsistent with the performance of the rated assets.  So if subprime MBS performed as rated, why then did we have a crisis? For a number of reasons, one of which is that the over-leveraged nature of banks forced them to sell securities, including subprime MBS, as an avenue to cover mark-to-market losses that would have otherwise threatened their insolvency.  When many banks tried to sell the same securities at once, in an almost fire-sale manner, prices fell, reflecting the massive imbalance between the supply for sale and the much lower demand.  Subsequent research has found that it was the most highly leveraged companies that sold MBS during the crisis, and that those with greater capital shortfalls sold at greater discounts. Observed prices were ultimately reflective of illiquidity and the capital needs of sellers, not the long-run value of subprime MBS.  One contributor to fire sales is that banking regulation, including an overreliance on ratings, encourages uniformity in bank balance sheets. If everyone is required to hold only AAA and searches for yield within AAA, then everyone ends up with similar balance sheets.  Unfortunately, when many are forced to sell, they end up selling similar assets, resulting in fire-sale prices. Sanders is also wrong in suggesting that regulators or nonprofits would do a better job predicting default. After all, it was the international financial regulators, not the rating agencies, who decided that Greek debt was "risk-free."  Europe was not alone in this regard. For instance, the rating agencies had downgraded Washington Mutual, while its primary regulator still gave it a favorable Camels (CELS) rating.  Where the rating agencies erred most was in their forecast of housing prices. They clearly didn't see a bust coming. But neither did regulators or government forecasters.


(WELFARE & TAXED SERVITUDE)  Suppose there is an elderly widow in your neighborhood. She does not have the strength to mow her lawn, clean her windows and perform other household tasks. Plus she does not have the financial means to hire someone to perform them. Here is my question: Would you support a government mandate that forces one of your neighbors to mow the widow's lawn, clean her windows and perform other household tasks? Moreover, if the person so ordered failed to obey the government mandate, would you approve of some sort of sanction, such as a fine, property confiscation or imprisonment? I believe and hope that most of my fellow Americans would find such a mandate repulsive. They would rightfully condemn it as a form of slavery, which can also be described as the forcible use of one person to serve the purposes of another.  Would there be the same condemnation if, instead of forcing one of your neighbors to actually perform the household tasks, your neighbor were forced to fork over $50 of his weekly earnings to the widow? That way, she could hire someone to perform the tasks that she is unable to do. Would that mandate differ from one under which your neighbor is forced to actually perform the household tasks? I'd answer no. Just the mechanism differs for forcibly using one person to serve the purposes of another. (does she have family or friends to help or pay or how about a reverse mortgage or how about if she can’t maintain it, then she has to sell it and move in with family?)  Congress has completely succumbed to the pressure to use one American to serve the purposes of another. As a result, spending grows. Today's federal budget is about $3.8 trillion. At least two-thirds of it can be described as Congress taking the earnings of one American to give to another.   I personally believe in helping one's fellow man in need. Doing so by reaching into one's own pockets is laudable and praiseworthy. Doing so by reaching into another's pockets is evil and worthy of condemnation.




The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect"


Yes, this is the stock that has almost singlehandedly destroyed a handful of hedge funds this year: SunEdison (SUNE).




Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Charles Grassley of Iowa and Ted Cruz of Texas -- that would poison S.744 in a variety of ways, like setting unattainable standards for certifying that the border is sealed..."  You can view actions that both Hopefuls have taken on immigration during their time in the Senate by visiting our Congressional grade cards. Rubio has earned an overall career grade of a D+, while Cruz has earned a career grade of an A+.



‘Marcobot.’ In the debate, it appeared as if someone has programmed him with artificial intelligence in a series of eloquent and powerful phrases that fit almost any policy matter. Re: He sounded like Siri answering a question about driving-directions. In case you don’t have an iPhone: Sometimes Siri just keeps repeating the same phrase or question because she doesn’t understand the question and has no clue as to the answer. This is what happens when every moment can’t be scripted by a handler. There is no doubt Marco Rubio’s rhetoric is eloquent, uplifting and powerful. But, so were Barack Obama’s speeches, circa 2008. I’m not criticizing Marco Rubio’s qualities as a person. I’m simply stating that he’s not experienced enough in leadership to be given the Nation’s top-job.


(Rubio an untrustworthy liar--the Republican Owebummer..) When Rubio came to Washington he immediately began working on the DREAM Act he campaigned against. He staffed his office with several of the most pro-amnesty individuals in Washington (like Cesar Conda) and was limp to the point of lifeless in his response when the President nullified immigration law with the DREAMer executive amnesty.  His deceptions about his immigration bill rivaled and exceeded Obama’s claims about disastrous Obamacare.

Pro-Rubio radio star now mocks Marco 'Robot'

This radio star may have been the reason Marco Rubio got elected to the U.S. Senate in the first place.
But that was then, and this is now, as the broadcaster is scorching Marco as a "pathological liar" ...

Read the latest now on WND.com.


Special-ops.org reported that 80 Australian special forces soldiers embedded in front-line Iraqi units and directed over 1,000 airstrikes. This is precisely what Washington should have done in mid-2014, when the Islamic State first invaded Iraq: provide embedded air control teams and combat advisers. 


Gaping holes in the K1 fiance visa interview process. Reckless bans on scrutinizing visa applicants' social media posts. Ignored alarms over marriage fraud. New details keep seeping out about all the "red flags" Obama's immigration officials missed in the case of the San Bernardino jihadists.  These hacks won't even vet each other. They place "optics," "diversity" and political protectionism above national security.


ABC News is reporting that Homeland Security officials have been bound by a secret (Democrap Owebummer) US policy not to scrutinize visa applicants' social media footprint because the Obama administration feared bad press over "civil liberties." This represents a stunning, intentional dereliction of duty -- all for PR.. a) maybe we should stem the flow of immigrants to a rate at which we can properly screen people, & (b) perhaps some form of "profiling" to trigger additional screening should be considered?  Remember how the US State Department declared itself perfectly "satisfied" with the visa screening process that green-lit San Bernadino terrorist Tashfeen Malik's entry into the country -- even as concerning details about her background and family have come to light?  Set aside the detail that her husband was reportedly in contact with several suspected jihadists who had attracted the feds' attention.  Set aside the apparent fact that she provided false information on her visa application, which then sailed through.  Let's focus on this New York Times story published over the weekend, which contains frightening and baffling information..  Haney was given an agency award for his work identifying potential terrorists and he was asked to become part of the National Targeting Center, which works to connect the dots between radical figures and groups, he said. After more than six months tracking the Deobandi movement, Homeland Security halted the investigation at the urging of the State Department’s Office of Civil Rights, Haney said.


The Department of Homeland Security says they "can't" monitor the social media of terrorists? Why not! As Presidential Candidiate Carly Fiorina said, "For heaven's sake, every parent in America is checking social media and employers are, too."


ABC News Digs Up Video of Jimmy Carter Announcing Ban on Iranian Immigration   April 7, 1980

DONALDSON:  The president ordered four steps immediately: A complete break in diplomatic relations: Iranian diplomats must leave the United States by tomorrow midnight.  Official sanctions preventing exports to Iran.  An inventory of frozen Iranian assets of over $8 billion, and a virtual shutting off of all Iranian immigration into this country by refusing new visas to Iranian citizens.  Moreover, the president warned these four steps may be just the beginning.  CARTER:  Other action may become necessary if these steps do not produce the prompt release of the hostages.


US Code 1182: The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, written and passed by Democrat-controlled Congress.  "Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president.  Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."   There is precedent for everything Donald Trump has said he wants to do.  In November the 1979 United States attorney general had given all Iranian students one month to report to the local immigration office.  Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979.  This law was passed in 1952.  There was no immigration in 1952.  It was shut down.  Immigration was shut down 1924 to 1965.  What was the need for this in 1952?  Oh, yeah, we had rampant illegal immigration. I'm talking about we suspended legal immigration from 1924 to 1965, but we were being overrun in 1952 like we always are.  That law was written to allow the president to keep undesirables out and to kick undesirables out. 


Otherwise known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was meant to exclude certain immigrants from immigrating to America, post World War II and in the early Cold War. The McCarran-Walter Act moved away from excluding immigrants based simply upon country of origin. Instead it focused upon denying immigrants who were unlawful, immoral, diseased in any way, politically radical etc. and accepting those who were willing and able to assimilate into the US economic, social, and political structures, which restructured how immigration law was handled. Furthermore, the most notable exclusions were anyone even remotely associated with communism which in the early days of the Cold War was seen as a serious threat to US democracy.



FDR in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor and the entrance of the U.S. into war with Germany, Italy, and Japan doing the following things that would make Donald Trump look like a nerdy weakling.  Germany, Italy and the Japanese were the Muslims of the day in December, 1941. Actually, FDR being the thorough kind of guy that he was, had his Proclamation 2526 come after his Proclamation 2525, which targeted the perpetrators of Pearl Harbor — the Japanese.  Oh. And don’t forget the Italians. The Fascists. (Democrap) FDR went on after his proclamations about how America would deal with German and Japanese immigrants to include Mussolini’s Fascists. That would be in presidential proclamation 2527, which was headed with a proclamation about “Alien Enemies—Italians.”  What did this treatment mean if you were an actual German, Japanese or Italian immigrant to America living under the FDR regime? Try this if you were Italian:  Nationwide, approximately 600,000 Italian-born residents of the United States were declared enemy aliens. The term “enemy alien” was not unique to World War II. The classification traces its roots to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which stated that if the United States was at war with a country then any “natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation” residing in the United States who were not naturalized citizens were considered “enemy aliens.”   Not a peep from the whitewashing DNC that their hero FDR was Donald Trump on steroids when America was under attack, with FDR using his presidential powers to declare Germans, Italians, and Japanese in America “enemy aliens,” slapping curfews on them, registering them, taking away everything from their guns to their binoculars to their right to travel to their jobs.



French authorities also raided the homes of some 2,235 private homes resulting in the arrests of 232 people on terror-related charges.  In all, more than three hundred weapons were discovered in the mosques and the private homes that authorities targeted. According to France 24, the haul included a large cache of 7.62mm ammunition, Kalashnikov rifles and terrorist propaganda videos.  “In 15 days we have seized one-third of the quantity of war-grade weapons that are normally seized in a year,” France’s Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve told the Express newspaper.  By some accounts, French authorities are planning to shut down 100 mosques and Islamic centers.



Hawaii Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard appeared on CNN with Wolf Spitzer recently to discuss Obama’s failed effort to overthrow the government of Syria. Gabbard is a former Iraq war veteran.  According to Gabbard, Obama is “arming our enemies which are radical Islam” and leading America into a wider conflict – potentially World War III.  When asked how this potential conflict could be avoided, she stated:  “Very simple. The U.S. and the CIA should stop this illegal and counter-productive war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad and should stay focused on fighting against who our enemy is, the Islamic extremist groups,” she said.  Gabbard is a member of the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs Committee and appears to be one of a few Democrats who can actually think logically about Islamic terrorism.


The 34-year-old combat veteran has ramped up her argument that Syrian President Bashar Assad should be left in power to help tamp down the Islamic State (ISIS). She has introduced legislation to defund efforts by the United States to overthrow Assad.
She also voted with Republicans to toughen screening of Syrian refugees – despite a veto threat from Obama.  "My responsibility is to the people of Hawaii and the American people to stand up and fight for what is right and what is in the best interest of our country," she told the Times. "That has nothing to do with party politics."


Sen. Jeff Sessions recently released a list of 12 vetted refugees who joined jihad plots to attack America to raise awareness of just how dangerous these individuals can be.  “This list — which only covers 2015 and not the many jihadis from prior years — illustrates just how incapable our government is of vetting refugees or predicting post-entry radicalization,” a Washington aide to the Alabama Republican told Breitbart.



The Holy Quran, as Obama likes to call it, teaches that this false god’s will must be obeyed and that all infidels must perish from the earth. As the inscription reads on a ring the “Muslim of the Year” has worn since college, “There is no god but Allah,”
Notwithstanding that Obama’s Kenyan father was a Muslim – who, ironically, was deported from the United States as having been illegally here under an expired visa – Thanks in large part to Obama, there now exists ISIS and its Islamic state, coupled with a nuclear Islamic Iran, with the means and money to eventually achieve Allah’s goal of worldwide domination by Muslims and extinction of the rest of us.



AZRAQ REFUGEE CAMP, Jordan — Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson has visited a camp for Syrian refugees and suggested they should be absorbed by neighboring Middle Eastern countries.


However the phony feel-goods quickly change their tune when they were asked if they would be willing to house refugees themselves. Their bleeding hearts suddenly turned ice cold and they stated flatly that they couldn’t take in any refugees.  “I think they all ought to go read the Statue of Liberty,” one man said regarding the governors refusing to take in refugees.  However, when presented a “form” with which he could sign up to house refugees, he coldly refused: “I’m not going to be able to do that.”  There were many more in the video with similar reactions, and you can see them all for yourself in the video from In The Now



6)  you’d deny you’re racist for insisting that black Americans aren’t competent enough to get an ID to vote.

9) ….You simultaneously believe the police are violent trigger-happy racists who shoot people for no good reason and that we should disarm the populace so that only the government has guns.

13) ….You believe that anyone who dislikes Barack Obama must hate him because he’s a minority, but your hatred of Ted Cruz and Clarence Thomas is perfectly justifiable.

16) ….You blame the Republicans for the failure of Obamacare even though none of them voted for it.

17) ….Your first response to a terrorist attack committed by radical Islamists who’ve sworn allegiance to ISIS is to try to disarm every law-abiding gun owner in the country.

18) ….You think an unemployed, white factory worker who’s struggling to feed his family has some sort of racial privilege compared to Barack Obama, Melissa Harris Perry or Al Sharpton.

19) ….You say fences don’t work and gun-free zones do, but if Republicans wanted the fence around the White House taken down and demanded that the Secret Service be disarmed, you’d accuse them of trying to get Obama killed.

20) ….You believe Bruce Jenner is a woman, Rachel Dolezal is black and Elizabeth Warren is an Indian.



In the year 2000 George Soros and other billionaires met at a "Thunder Road" conference to plot the creation of several anti-Christian organizations, such as the Center for American Progress, Media Matters, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), America Votes, and MoveOn.org.  "It's just sheer genius, in a way, because they call them the most benevolent names possible," Wallnau said. "Let's MoveOn.org. Move on from what? Well, move on from values and God into anarchy, but they don't say that; it's move on from Bush and his nutty stuff."  Watch!  Dr. Chaps' interview with Lance Wallnau on how the left strategized to take over America-->  Wallnau explains with clarity how the Church must re-take the "7 Mountains" of Arts, Media, Education, Government, Business, Family, and Church.


Zionica has partnered with http://constitution.com/  to give you a FREE subscription to the Constitution.com Newsletter. Every day, you'll receive exclusive news and commentary that can't be found anywhere else on the web. All at no cost to you! While you're waiting for your first edition, we'd like to offer you a free downloadable PDF of The Pocket Catechism on the Constitution, originally published in 1828! Click here to download your copy now.



Ken Blackwell is the Senior Fellow for Family Empowerment at the Family Research Council.  He is a national bestselling author of three books: Rebuilding America: A Prescription For Creating Strong Families, Building The Wealth Of Working People, And Ending WelfareThe Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency; and Resurgent: How Constitutional Conservatism Can Save America.




Terrorists use cell phones, experts say, especially the disposable pre-paid type, to communicate with each other. The cell phones can also be converted for use as detonators for explosive devices.



Jihad Watch reports on the latest case of Muslim rape gangs in England being caught sexualy assaulting young non-Muslim girls.  Under Islam, a Muslim man is perfectly justified in raping non-Muslim women as part of the spoils of war. In fact, the Quran repeatedly encourages Muslim men to enjoy sex slaves.  They [the Muslim rapists] consider what they did to be perfectly justified: according to the Qur’an, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says:

O Prophet! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war (33:50).  Qur’an 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls.


Nadia Murad Basee Taha, 21   The 21-year-old described the persecution the Yazidi people face under ISIS, which trades women and children from the minority population as ‘war booty’. ‘They took us to Mosul with more than 150 other Yazidi families. In a building, there were thousands of Yazidi families and children who were exchanged as gifts


Professor Suad Saleh is a teacher at Al-Azhar, and she has some interesting things to tell you about Islam and rape.

Rape is okay, If you’re doing it to humiliate your female prisoner of war who is now a captured slave.



Nezar Hamze is a leader in the Hamas-related Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). He is also a Deputy Sheriff in the Broward Sheriff’s Office (BSO), in Broward County, Florida. This background has given him the opportunity to exploit his position in law enforcement to assist his Islamist friends in their desire for weapons training. This month, he did so at a Tampa Bay, Florida mosque that partners with designated terrorist organizations.


What is constitutional verdict on Trump's Muslim ban?

There's been plenty of controversy about Donald Trump's plan to stop Muslims from coming to America.
And apparently, the issue of its constitutionality may have already been settled ...

Read the latest now on WND.com.


Trump gets away with his mistakes, such is the bond of loyalty his support base has for him that he gets away with them and I don't think he's made that many, don't misunderstand," Rush said (bolding is mine). "But for any of you that are holding out hope that Trump is a genuine conservative, even in the Republican field, would not go after Cruz this way. That just raised a red flag for me."   You can listen to the exchange on TheRightScoop here.   UPDATE: Limbaugh denies an attack on Trump.   He clarified, “I haven’t turned on anybody. I haven’t thrown anybody away. I haven’t announced support for anybody.”
He insisted he was just disappointed and asking a question about Trump’s attack on Cruz “because it sounded like the same kind of criticism we would get from the establishment Republicans.”


Conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin blasted GOP front-runner Donald Trump for falling for media traps on Sunday and criticizing Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.  "It's been a tough two days for Donald Trump. I hope he learns from this," Levin said on his radio show Monday.


Here are several key characteristics of a fascist leader according to CNN:

"The superiority of the leader's instincts over abstract and universal reason."  2. "The belief of one group that it is the victim, justifying any action."  3. "The need for authority by natural leaders (always male) culminating in a national chief who alone is capable of incarnating the group's destiny."  Wait a minute. What modern politician best fits this description? "Liberal fascism," as my friend Jonah Goldberg has aptly pointed out in his book of the same title, is the "collaboration of government, church, unions and interest groups to expand government. It is simply the liberal impulse for controlling the lives of others." It is the religion of the left.  the real definition of a fascist is a leader who wants to use governmental power to suppress rights of individuals. It is the partnership of government and private industry for the "collective good."  Fascism, communism, socialism, Nazism, progressivism are all just variations on this same theme. These "isms" all feed on the subjugation of freedom.



a much-needed lesson in Islam 101 is now in session.  On a Facebook page called Silence is Consent, an unnamed woman who grew up as a Muslim in the Middle East is presenting the facts about Islam because so many people get it wrong.  I have never seen more developed Muslims in my life, and I grew up as one.”  She criticized those who teach a “sugar coated” version of Islam and reminded viewers to investigate the reality of Islam’s founder.  “What did Muhammad do? He was a rapist, a pedophile, a mass murderer,” she said. “Not to mention a warmonger, liar, cheater, thief, adulterer.”  “You want to teach about Islam, teach about Muhammad’s sex slaves,” she said. After calling feminists and LGBT activists “hypocrites,” she reminded the West that in Islam, women are stoned and butchered.


(the Religion of Peace)  Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27, killed 14 at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino. The two brought rifles, pistols, improvised explosive devices and a large amount of ammunition to their rampage. They were killed less than three miles away during a shootout with police.


“Well,” he continued, “now let me see, Mr. President. She seemed to be an immigrant … that was brought in under your administration through all of your screening practices. (She went through our “vetting” process) You just mocked us for being afraid of women and children and widows. What, are you afraid of a new bride?”  He concluded by insisting that he is scared of anyone coming from Islam-dominated corners of the world.


Law enforcement officials told CNN on Thursday that Farook had been in touch with individuals under investigation by the FBI for ties to international terrorism.  Nice to see that NSA spying program has proven so effective.  Farook took part in the Hajj, a pilgrimage to Mecca that Islamic law requires all able-bodied Muslims to make at least once during their lifetimes, in 2013. He reportedly met Malik during that trip and brought her back to the United States on a “fiancée visa.” 


Tashfeen Malik came in under a K-1 visa, colloquially known as a “fiancee visa.” It requires a good deal more scrutiny than a 90-day visa waiver, something that should have been able to pick up on any indication that Malik was a threat.  However, as we previously reported, the Department of Homeland Security passed Malik on her counterterrorism screening even though she gave a nonexistent address in Pakistan to obtain her K-1 visa — something that should have been an enormous red flag.


Here’s a quick list of the laws in California that the terrorists broke during the shooting Wednesday:  The long guns used were banned and illegal to purchase.  The magazines used in the pistols were illegal to purchase in.  It is illegal in the state to modify a weapon to make it fully automatic, and one of the long guns was modified in that way.  Stockpiling weapons and ammunition in one’s home is illegal in California.  The guns and ammunition were stored in an illegal manner, accessible to any child.  In light of the strict gun laws, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy pressed White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest with this question: “Does the president really think that common sense gun laws would deter terrorists now that he has admitted these two may have been terrorists?”  Doocy dug further into the matter, asking, “But so the president thinks that when there are potentially two terrorists sitting around planning a mass murder, they may call it off because President Obama has put in place common sense gun laws?”  (they were NOT on the no fly list either, so why bring that up? Which terrorist was on this no fly list? skip the gun control BS and arrest & interrogate them, lock them up at Gitmo.)


First Amendment aside, the Federal Bureau of Investigation recently released a report showing that, if the administration is actually worried about protecting religious Americans from violent outbursts, it is focusing on the wrong faith. The agency studied all hate crimes reported during the year 2014, finding that just over 17 percent were based on the victim’s faith. Of that number, a disproportionate percentage – more than half – of the victims belonged to one religion. Despite making up just over two percent of the nation’s population, Jews represented 56.8 percent of hate crimes committed against a religion. Muslim bias was a far less common problem, the FBI found, with roughly 16 percent of all anti-religious hate crime victims belonging to the faith. As Breitbart’s John Nolte opined in the aftermath of Obama’s speech, there “is simply no Muslim backlash evident in the U.S., aside from “Obama’s push to create Second Amendment internment camps for gun rights


Although not all are bad characters, the San Bernardino shooters were Sunni Muslims.  According to CNSNews's numbers, the Obama administration is still letting in hundreds of Syrian refugees -- just not the ones who identify as Christians. Since the November 13 terrorist tragedy in France, the U.S. has opened its doors to 236 Sunni Muslims and one (one!) Christian.



“The headlines say Farook and his wife were a couple ‘bent on jihad,'” Graham wrote. “President Obama and his administration are trying to blame this incident on gun control when it was caused by hate-filled hearts intent on killing infidels in the name of Islam.”  Graham furthered emphasized the fact that the oft-touted Obama mantra in which any type of shooting is blamed on gun control issues is entirely wrong because Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik were terrorists with bomb-making materials in their possession.  “Take away the guns and this couple would’ve still slaughtered innocent civilians,” Graham continued. “Their apartment was a bomb-making factory!”  (these radical Islamic terrorists will use bombs, poison, fires/arson, vehicles, arrows, knives, hammers, bats, rocks etc. to kill us, wake up.)  He concluded his post by imploring Obama to reconsider his immigration plan for anyone associated with radical Islam.  “Mr. President, we don’t need more gun control — we need border & immigration control. No Muslims should be allowed into this country until there’s a process in place to fully vet them (Tashfeen Malik made it through our “vetting” process), ” he wrote. “We’ve got to turn away those who could potentially pose a threat until this war with radical Islam is over.”


Even if 90 percent of all Muslims are fine people, and we admit 10,000 refugees from the Middle East, does that mean that we need not be concerned about adding a thousand potential terrorists -- even after we have seen in San Bernardino what just two terrorists can do? The first responsibility of any government is to protect the people already in the country. Even in this age of an entitlement mentality, no one in a foreign country is entitled to be in America if the American people don't want them here.   Obama may think of himself as a citizen of the world, but he was elected President of the United States, not head of a world government, and that does not authorize him to gamble the lives of Americans for the benefit of people in other countries.   The illusion that you can take in large numbers of people from a fundamentally different culture, without jeopardizing your own culture -- and everything that depends on it -- should have been dispelled by many counterproductive social consequences in Europe, even aside from the fatal dangers of terrorists.   Most refugees in the Middle East can be helped in the Middle East, and many Americans would undoubtedly be willing to financially help Muslim countries like Jordan or Egypt to care for these refugees in societies more compatible with their beliefs and values.   First of all, those immigrants were stopped at Ellis Island to be checked medically and otherwise, and were allowed to get off that island to go ashore only after they had met whatever legal standards there were. Otherwise, they were sent back where they came from.   More fundamentally, people came here to assimilate into the American society they found, not to become isolated enclaves of aggrieved foreigners, demanding that Americans adjust to their languages, their values and their ways of life.   Like so much that President Obama says, his talk of "stronger screening" of people coming into the United States is sheer fantasy, when even his own intelligence officials and law enforcement officials say that we have no adequate data on which to base a meaningful screening of Syrian refugees.



If Americans tuned in to the president's speech last night hoping for a substantive, long-term strategy to defeat ISIS, they're still waiting. In a rare talk on terrorism (from an even rarer setting), the president managed to talk for 13 minutes without saying anything new. Backed into a corner by tragedies his failed policies helped create, President Obama tried to answer his critics on the administration's inadequate response to radical Islam. But after a familiar lecture on tolerance and gun control, all he accomplished was proving his opponents right.  If his strategy had been working, last night's speech wouldn't have been necessary! "As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people," he said, while providing no evidence that he takes that security seriously.  With a military frayed by seven years of social experimentation and the Muslim faith afforded more tolerance than the Christians who founded this nation, Americans last night were far from reassured.  Americans with guns aren't the problem. The problem is that the policies of the Obama administration allow people into the country who hate America. The idea that radicalized Muslims can be stopped through stricter gun control laws shows a serious lack of understanding of the threat and tactics of terrorists.



The internet is saturated with data that has been tinkered with enough to provide them with “evidence” that gun control “works”.  The goal is simple: get them to admit that what they want is gun confiscation, and in the process, demonstrate that this will never happen. Watch with glee as their vision of Utopia crumbles (again) before their eyes, before cognitive dissonance takes over and forces them to de-friend you.  1) Gun ownership is a Constitutional right that will not be overturned by legislation, the courts, or a constitutional amendment. Ever. The last attempt, and the first one in 70 years to be heard by SCOTUS, was a resounding failure.  Restrictions only harm law-abiding individuals, depriving them of any ability to defend themselves. Criminals don't obey laws, and neither do terrorists.  7) Any attempt at confiscation not only violates the 2nd Amendment, it violates the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments.  That’s it. Ten simple facts. You can add a bonus if you like. Every time Obama talks about gun control, gun sales rise.  Why claim that they want gun control “even if it saves just one life”, while simultaneously claiming that abortions should be legal?  It always goes back to the Leftist desire for Utopia, where bad things never happen. The only way to prevent bad things is to control everything.



His proposed legislation, the Regulatory Agency De-militarization Act, would repeal the authorization for these types of agencies to arrest individuals. It would also take away their ability to purchase and own firearms.  The bill would furthermore require reports detailing every agency that receives military training.  This legislation is sure to upset President Barack Obama and his administration, which likes the idea of government having guns, but not the people.  The Homeland Security Act of 2002 gave many federal organizations the ability to establish their own police-like divisions over the years to carry out raids, and this has many GOP lawmakers thinking the act went too far, according to the Washington Examiner.  Offices like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Food and Drug Administration have established teams that could conduct their own raids and arrests.  “Not only is it overkill, but having these highly armed units within dozens of agencies is duplicative, costly, heavy handed, dangerous and destroys any sense of trust between citizens and the federal government,” he said.



I have a 1st Amendment right, Ms Lynch, to say whatever I want about Muslims.  You want to try and prosecute me for what I say? I dare you. Here goes:   "Most Muslims around the world are terrorists, support terrorism, and/or support Shariah law. They are our enemy. I don't want them in America. Any Muslim that won't assimilate should get the hell out of America. Any Muslim that is a terrorist or supports terrorism should be killed. If 'moderate' Muslims don't speak out against terrorism, they are our enemy and we should call them out and kick them out of this country.



“I don’t think it’s about more gun control,” Samuel L. Jackson told the Los Angeles Times three years ago, just after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. “I grew up in the South with guns everywhere, and we never shot anyone. This is about people who aren’t taught the value of life.”


Tell your Representative and Senators to oppose every effort from the White House to cynically use Obama’s failure to curb terrorism as an excuse to impose a “secret blacklist” gun ban (Who decides who are on this list and what criteria do they use, while keeping in mind the abusive, corrupt Democraps who fill our gov’t).  There is a better way.  Repeal Gun Free Zones and allow the American people to defend themselves. Focus should be on encouraging concealed carry and attending a good shooting school, plus having more shooting schools available. How about Affordable Gun Ownership and training!  www.gunsite.com    www.shootrite.com   www.thunderranchinc.com    
If you are serious about personal defense, you really and truly need to attend a good shooting school.

http://guntalk.com/site30.php                   http://www.shopguntalk.com/DVDs_c5.htm           




Falwell encouraged students to take free conceal-carry courses offered at the Lynchburg, Va. university.  "I just want to take this opportunity to encourage all of you to get your permit," he said in his convocation speech. "We offer you a free course. And let's teach them a lesson if they ever show up here."  I've got three favorites at this point: [Donald] Trump, [Ted] Cruz and [Ben] Carson, not necessarily in that order," Falwell said.

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson – author of the just-released book. "The Antidote: Healing America From the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood" – explained to Hannity's vast audience how fatherlessness and a toxic culture of victimhood, common to far too many black Americans, profoundly shaped Barack Obama and shaped him into the lying, deceitful politician he is today.  "The Antidote," says Peterson early on in the book, is "the book I've always wanted to write – a book that tells the truth, that provides the roadmap to rebuilding families, that lets the reader know there really is an antidote so they no longer need to hate, blame, or play the victim."


at least two of the emails Hillary Clinton received on her private, unsecure server as secretary of state were not only classified, but “top secret.”   This is more affirmation that Clinton placed American national security at risk by receiving intelligence that was not properly stored.



(Why do Jewish people vote for Democraps?)  On 13 May 1939, more than 900 Jews fled Germany aboard a luxury cruise liner, the SS St Louis.  For the next seven days, Captain Schroder tried in vain to persuade the Cuban authorities to allow them in. In fact, the Cubans had already decided to revoke all but a handful of the visas - probably out of fear of being inundated with more refugees fleeing Europe. The captain then steered the St Louis towards the Florida coast, but the US authorities also refused it the right to dock, despite direct appeals to (D) President Franklin Roosevelt. Granston thinks he too was worried about the potential flood of migrants. By early June, Captain Schroder had no option but to turn the giant liner back towards Europe. In the end, the ship's passengers did not have to go back to Nazi Germany. Instead, Belgium, France, Holland and the UK agreed to take the refugees. The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) posted a cash guarantee of $500,000 - or $8 million (£4.7m) in today's money - as part of an agreement to cover any associated costs.


In September 1944, the Union of Orthodox Rabbi's of the United States and Canada pleaded with the U.S. War Refugee Board and War Department to bomb the railway lines headed to Auschwitz as news of mass deportations of Hungarian Jews began to reach the States.  The Allies never bombed the lines nor the camps and to this day, one of the longstanding controversies about World War II


The Noachide Laws are seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties required by the Bible on all men. While Jews are obligated to observe the whole Torah - 613 commandments, every non-Jew is considered a "son of the covenant of Noah" and he who accepts these obligations is considered a righteous person who is guaranteed a place in the world to come.

The seven Noachide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:

  1. Do Not Deny God     (Godless Evolution promoted by Democraps)
  2. Do Not Blaspheme God
  3. Do Not Murder   (Abortion promoted by Democraps)
  4. Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships.  (All Promoted by Democraps)
  5. Do Not Steal   (Democraps love to use the government to steal)
  6. Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
  7. Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience (Democraps pick and choose laws and use Government to make immoral laws)




Had Obama's lies about his triumph over terrorism been exposed on the eve of the election, that could have ended his stay in the White House. And that could have spared us and the world many of Obama's disasters in the Middle East and elsewhere around the world. That is why it matters, and will continue to matter in the future.  If there is anything that is bipartisan in Washington, it is lying. The most recent budget deal showed that Congressional Republicans lied wholesale when they said that they would defund Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, and other pet projects of the Democrats.  



As determined by Islamic law, church bells did not sound throughout the Middle East for more than a thousand years from the 7th century conquests until modern times (except under the Crusaders).  This was due to the conditions set by the Pact of the Caliph Umar, by which Christians of Syria surrendered to Islamic conquest in the 7th century AD. 



Jeff Foxworthy on Muslims:  1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor,
You may be a Muslim.  2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can’t afford shoes,
You may be a Muslim.  3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.   4.If you wipe your butt with your bare hand but consider bacon to be unclean,  You may be a Muslim.  5. If you think vests come in two styles: Bullet-proof and suicide.
You may be a Muslim  9. If you have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four, You may be a Muslim


According to new research, "the military's suicide story is mostly about millennials." Thanks to the University of Utah, the Defense Department is getting a clearer picture of the epidemic, which is taking more lives than combat deaths.

Desperate for bonding they aren't getting from their parents, more young men and women are joining the military in hopes of finding it, the Washington Times explains. And it's no coincidence that this same generation is more affected by divorce and family breakdown than any other. The effects of family breakdown are affecting every facet of society. At FRC's Marriage and Religious Research Institute (MARRI), Dr. Pat Fagan's team has found that in countries and cultures as far apart as Denmark and China, those from intact married families are much less prone to suicide. Once again, the data shows: America has nothing to lose and everything to gain by putting a new focus on the family -- and policies that encourage its formation.



At the Evans pool in Seattle, Washington, a man walked into the changing room of a local swimming pool and stripped naked in front of a girls’ swim team. When confronted about the disgusting display, the man simply replied that the city’s transgender policies gave him the freedom to do as he pleased.. The man left, only to return to the dressing room again a short while later during a youth swim time.



The Act authorized production of the following coins:[3]  All other sections of the act have been superseded, as for example the Coinage Act of 1834 changing the silver-to-gold weight ratio.



But then Grzanka lit this bombshell:  “And yet there is little scientific evidence to suggest that the categories we use today in the United States—categories that are historically quite new—originate in the body at all,” he said. “I think social scientists, lawyers, biological researchers and activists all need to examine why it is that many of us are so deeply invested in biological explanations of sexual orientation, particularly when they appear to have limited efficacy in terms of promoting more positive attitudes toward sexual minorities.”  Wait a minute; if it’s not biological, if it’s not genetic—and if that has been the whole reason for the gay rights movement—what is it? Is it a choice? You can’t change a leopard’s spots, but you can change a human being’s choices. Why, then, is sexual conversion therapy harmful?  Gay Science?  As we have seen, science journals and reporters have jumped on the gay-rights bandwagon, showing full support for the LGBT agenda (e.g., Live Science) even to the point of publishing frauds (remember the Lacour fraud, 12/12/14). Live Science happily announced this week that more young people are reporting same-sex attraction. But then watch this paragraph:  The latest findings showed that 92 percent of women and 95 percent of men identified themselves as being heterosexual or straight. Just less than 2 percent of men and a little more than 1 percent of women identified themselves as gay or lesbian, which is consistent with past survey data results.

Heterosexuals, meanwhile, may not feel very gay (happy) about the new decision by the FDA to lift the lifetime ban on gay men donating blood (Medical Xpress). That ban had been imposed to protect the public from HIV which is primarily carried by gay men. But how many realize that HIV is still a huge problem in the gay community? It’s not discussed as much now as it was in the 1980s, but Science Magazine just stated that “Despite the relative success of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the rate of new diagnoses has remained fairly constant.The article speaks of “men at risk of transmission” without stating the obvious: it’s gay men engaging in gay sex.  The ban has worked; there is no scientific reason to change it. Such government decisions play Russian Roulette with the lives of the 98% of straight Americans citizens, apparently for political correctness, so as not to hurt the feelings of the 2% who don’t want to be looked at as abnormal in any way.



South Dakota could soon become the first state in the nation to pass legislation that would ban students from using public school bathrooms, locker rooms and showers that are opposite from their biological sex.  The legislation requires that a “reasonable accommodation” be made for students asserting their gender is different from their biological sex, and described a reasonable accommodation as “one that does not impose an undue hardship on a school district,” “a single-occupancy restroom,” “a unisex restroom,” or the “controlled use of a restroom, locker room or shower room that is designated for use by faculty.”  “I’m concerned about what I see happening in schools across our country,” said Rep. Fred Deutsch, a Republican from Florence who introduced a bill last week that would ban transgender students from using school facilities opposite from their biological sex.



What does it mean to have sexual integrity?  Sexual integrity means living out one’s sexuality in a way consistent with the conjugal purpose and meaning of sex. This means the same thing for married and single people, albeit lived out in different ways – both are called to reserve sex for marriage and to be faithful in mind and body to one’s spouse.  Sexual integrity also refers to the attitudes and habits that make abstinence from extra-marital sex possible and that help reinforce marital fidelity. Read more.

What is marriage?  Marriage is the lifelong, exclusive union of one man and one woman. It is based on the reality that a man and a woman are necessary for reproduction and that children need a father and a mother. Marriage brings together a man and a woman to be committed to each other as husband and wife and together committed to their children as father and mother. Read more.

What do stable, intact families contribute to society?  Because stable, intact families are rooted in stable marriages, they benefit children and society in the same ways that intact marriages do. First, married men and women tend to be happier, healthier and wealthier than their single peers. As for their children, growing up in an intact family is strongly associated with better emotional health and higher levels of education, work, and income among young men and women. Adolescents from intact families are also more likely to delay becoming sexually active, which also means lower levels of teen pregnancy. Stability at home also tends to be associated with less risky behavior overall. Even something as simple as frequently having dinner with one’s family is associated with lower risk for substance abuse among teens. Finally, intact families rooted in stable marriages tend to lead to future stable marriages among the grown children of those unions. In other words, marriage reinforces marriages among the next generation. Individuals thrive when they have the security of a stable, intact family life. And when individuals and their families thrive, society thrives. Read more.



I lived as a transgender, Laura Jensen, female, for eight years. While studying psychology in a university program, I discovered that trans kids most often are suffering from a variety of disorders, starting with depression—the result of personal loss, broken families, sexual abuse, and unstable homes. Deep depression leads kids to want to be someone other than who they are.  Caregivers all too often collaborate with a mental disorder instead of treating it. Telling a psychologically troubled boy he has changed genders is not compassion, but can become reckless parenting. By withholding psychotherapy, parents could be abusing the kid.



There’s been no firm evidence that there’s a genetic basis for homosexuality. But that’s never been one of our main points in arguing against homosexuality. We believe that people are born with all sorts of inborn tendencies that are sinful. Lots of heterosexual men don’t find monogamy very natural, but we don’t change God’s commands to allow for their sinful tendency.



(but we can’t put to death convicted murderers this way too since this is so “humane”??)  In 1997, Oregon became the first state in the nation to legalize physician-assisted suicide. It has since been legalized in Washington, Vermont, and most recently California.



1) One in five college-age women have been raped.  How many college-age women are raped according to the FBI? The actual rate is “6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5).” Rape is a serious issue and dramatically misrepresenting the number of women being raped is despicable.

3) Fifty percent of marriages end in divorce. If you get married at this point, especially to a college-educated woman over the age of 25, it’ll probably be for life.   Rather than viewing marriage as a 50-50 shot in the dark it can be viewed as having a 70 percent likelihood of succeeding. But even to use that kind of generalization, i.e., one simple statistic for all marriages, grossly distorts what is actually going on.  for college educated women who marry after the age of 25 and have established an independent source of income, the divorce rate is only 20 percent!

4) Ten percent of the population is gay.  The survey found that a mere 1.6 percent of the adult population self-identifies as “lesbian/gay,” and an even smaller 0.7 percent told interviewers they were bisexual. The bisexuals were outnumbered by the 1.1 percent who didn’t know, wouldn’t answer or said they were “something else.”  This result was far from the 10 percent that homosexual rights advocates have claimed since the 1970s.

5) Ninety seven percent of scientists agree that global warming is manmade and dangerous. How do you prove 97% of people agree with you? Find a tiny subset of a group that thinks just like you do and claim that it speaks for a much larger group of people. Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer did an excellent piece explaining how this works at the WSJSeventy-nine scientists only—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make.  Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.  It’s simply untrue that the scientific community has decided almost as a whole that global warming is happening, manmade and problematic.



(Evolution, Global cooling-warming-climate change-weather)  Pure speculations that are demonstrably unempirical are published daily by Big Science and Big Media, with no rebuttals or caveats.  Here’s how it works: a “scientist” or “researcher” gets a wacky idea that cannot be proved. Because they wear the honorable label of “scientist,” their opinions have presumptive authority.



(Greedy, power hungry Democraps—follow the money)  state taxpayers fund political activism that not only advances alarmist theories, but works to silence, marginalize, and even criminalize dissent.  As previously reported by The Daily Signal, a House committee wants to know more about Shukla’s work and the relationship between taxpayer money received by the academics and their urging of Obama to use racketeering law to go after businesses and other groups that oppose his climate change agenda. 

The Virginia Institute for Public Policy describes its mission as promoting policies that uphold the rule of law and constitutional limited government.  Taylor, the organization’s president, said he faults the Republican Party for not doing more to dismantle incestuous relationships between academics and government agencies as well as similar arrangements that give rise to conflicts of interests, wasteful spending, and bloated bureaucracies that burden taxpayers.  “Every time the Republicans come to power they leave the infrastructure the Democrats put into place untouched,” Taylor said. “This way when the Democrats come back into power, they just pick up right where they left off.”  “Renowned scientists like hurricane expert Dr. Bill Gray found out that when you challenge skepticism, your federal funding dries up.”



Matt Ridley, a member of a British coal-producing family and author of "The Rational Optimist," notes that the path of mankind's progress, material as well as moral, has been from reliance on renewable but insufficient energy sources to today's 85% reliance on energy from fossil fuels.  The progression has been from reliance on human (often slaves') muscles, to animal energy (first oxen, then horses), to burning wood and peat as stores of sunlight, to energy from water and wind, to, at last, fossil fuels.

Sustained economic growth, a necessary prerequisite for scientific and technological dynamism, became possible, Ridley writes, when humanity was able to rely on "non-renewable, non-green, non-clean power."  Because "there appeared from underground a near-magical substance," Britain's landscape was spared: "Coal gave Britain fuel equivalent to the output of 15 million extra acres of forest to burn, an area nearly the size of Scotland.  "By 1870, the burning of coal in Britain was generating as many calories as would have been expended by 850 million laborers. . .. The capacity of the country's steam engines alone was equivalent to 6 million horses or 40 million men."  And cheap coal produced the iron for new labor-saving machines. The environmental toll from burning coal (it emits carbon dioxide, radioactivity and mercury) has been slight relative to the environmental and other blessings from burning it.


The world is 1.08 degrees cooler than it was in 1998.  Just take a look at this chart from Remote Sensing Systems, which provides data to NASA, NOAA, and other scientific organizations.  a mere 1% of scientists believe human activity is causing most of the climate change.  The reality is simply this: The climate changes over time.  When Alexander the Great was conquering Persia, climate change was a big factor. And we all learned in high school that the “little ice age” that rocked Europe killed hundreds of thousands of people from the 1600s through the 1800s. Additionally, we know about the heat wave and drought that wiped out much of America during the 1930s. Thousands of people were dislocated in search of survival.

Were those events caused by man-made “global warming”?  Of course not.  Every year, the temperatures rise and fall with spring, summer, fall, and winter. A year is simply a 365-day cycle.  The sun is 1.3 million times larger than the earth. When its temperature changes, our temperature changes.  Every day, the temperatures rise and fall with daytime and nighttime. A day is simply a 24-hour cycle.  These two cycles happen automatically. We can neither change them nor stop them any more than we can stop the Earth’s rotation. It’s impossible. The temperatures fluctuate based on these cycles.  So clearly, the Earth’s temperatures rise and fall based on its exposure to . . . the sun.  Essentially, there are times when the sun gets hotter and times when it cools off as measured by “sunspots.” And John Casey found multiple solar cycles that determine the temperatures of the Earth.



However, climate models have predicted far more warming than has actually happened in the past 18 years. If models have been unable to accurately project climate conditions ten years out, how can even longer-term projections be depended upon to make good policy decisions?  Models created by the Environmental Protection Agency show that the climate impact of the Clean Power Plan is less than 0.02 degrees Celsius in warming avoided over the next 85 years. Meanwhile, it will be extremely costly to American families and businesses, and particularly so for the poor Midwestern states, which rely more heavily on coal for electricity, and the manufacturing sector, which is on the threshold of renewed growth brought on by the oil and gas revolution.



Creationists founded modern science:  Francis Bacon (1561–1626), the classical scientific method; Gerardus Mercator (1512–1594), cartography, inventor of the Mercator map projection; Galileo Galilei (1564–1642), physics, astronomy; Johann Kepler (1571–1630), astronomy; Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), probability, hydrostatics, the barometer; Robert Boyle (1627–1691), chemistry, gas dynamics; John Ray (1627–1705), natural history; Nicolaus Steno, founder of stratigraphy (geology); Isaac Newton (1642–1727), dynamics, gravitation law, law of cooling, reflecting telescope, spectrum of light, co-inventor of calculus; Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz (1646–1716), mathematics, co-inventor of calculus; John Flamsteed (1646–1719), Greenwich Observatory Founder; Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778), taxonomy, biological classification system; John Dalton (1766–1844), atomic theory, gas law. There are many others.1





With the passage of the 13th Amendment—which states that “[n]either slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction”—the central contradiction at the heart of the Founding was resolved.  Eighty-nine years after the Declaration of Independence had proclaimed all men to be free and equal, race-based chattel slavery would be no more in the United States.  The infamous three-fifths clause, which more nonsense has been written than any other clause, does not declare that a black person is worth 60 percent of a white person. It says that for purposes of determining the number of representatives for each state in the House (and direct taxes), the government would count only three-fifths of the slaves, and not all of them, as the Southern states, who wanted to gain more seats, had insisted. The 60,000 or so free blacks in the North and the South were counted on par with whites.  Contrary to a popular misconception, the Constitution also does not say that only white males who owned property could vote. The Constitution defers to the states to determine who shall be eligible to vote (Article I, Section 2, Clause 1). It is a little known fact of American history that black citizens were voting in perhaps as many as 10 states at the time of the founding (the precise number is unclear, but only Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia explicitly restricted suffrage to whites).  “Anyone of these provisions in the hands of abolition statesmen, and backed up by a right moral sentiment, would put an end to slavery in America,” Douglass concluded.  Those who want to see what a racist and pro-slavery Constitution would look like should turn to the Confederate Constitution of 1861. Though it largely mimics the Constitution, it is replete with references to “the institution of negro slavery,” “negroes of the African race,” and “negro slaves.” It specifically forbids the Confederate Congress from passing any “law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves.”   The slave-holding states would have never consented to a new Constitution that struck a blow at their peculiar institution. The Constitution did, however, empower Congress to prevent its spread and set it on a course of extinction, while leaving the states free to abolish it within their own territory at any time.  Before the Civil War, Frederick Douglass said that nothing in the Constitution should be interpreted as applying to slaves. The “language of the law must be construed strictly in favor of justice and liberty,” he argued.  Early Congresses did, however, regulate the transatlantic slave trade, pursuant to their power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations” (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). In 1794, 1800, and 1803, statutes were passed that severely restricted American participation in it. No American shipyard could be used to build ships that would engage in the slave trade, nor could any ship sailing from an American port traffic in slaves abroad. Americans were also prohibited from investing in the slave trade.

Finally, on the very first day on which it was constitutionally permissible to do so—Jan. 1, 1808—the slave trade was abolished by law.  The law, which President Thomas Jefferson signed, stipulated stiff penalties for any American convicted of participating in the slave trade: up to $10,000 in fines and five to 10 years in prison. In 1823, a new law was passed that punished slave-trading with death.  But even before the 13th Amendment, it was a Constitution that, if placed in the right hands, could be made to serve the cause of freedom.



ask yourself why black civil rights leaders over the past two centuries (such as Frederick Douglass, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, Benjamin Banneker, Francis Grimke, Henry Highland Garnett, and so many others) openly praised Jefferson as a racial civil rights pioneer and champion, v as did abolitionists such as John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, and others. viThey recognized that Jefferson led a vocal lifelong campaign to emancipate all slaves in the United States, but that the laws of Virginia prevented him from freeing his own slaves. (All of this is covered in my new book, "The Jefferson Lies.")  The real reason that Democrats should discard Jefferson is that he held nearly no policy position similar to those Democrats hold today. Consider fifteen major categories where the policies of Presidents Jefferson and Obama are opposite.

1. RADICAL ISLAM AND THE WAR ON TERROR.  At that time, America had no military capable of traveling overseas to destroy the seedbed of the war-mongering Islamicists plaguing Americans, so America resorted to large payments of money and goods in attempts to purchase peace and end the attacks. This unhappy policy, adopted under the Confederation Congress, continued under President George Washington.  Washington expressed his open frustration with this approach, declaring:  Would to Heaven we had a navy able to reform those enemies to mankind, or crush them into non-existence. xii  As he neared the close of his presidency, he requested that Congress appropriate money to build a navy capable of traveling to the Mediterranean to smash the Islamicists. xiii Congress did, and the navy was constructed under President John Adams, xiv who became known as "The Father of the Navy." xv But Adams refused to use the new navy, continuing the payments instead.  I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace through the medium of war. xix The power of making war often prevents it, and in our case would give efficacy to our desire of peace. xx  There were several reasons Jefferson believed this option was the best policy:  Justice is in favor of this opinion; honor favors it; it will procure us respect in Europe (and respect is a safeguard to interest) . . . [and] I think it least expensive [and] equally effectual. xxi  Understanding that it was time to end terrorist attacks against American persons and interests, he deployed an expeditionary force under General William Eaton and Commodore Edward Preble to exterminate the radical Islamicists. xxii The terrorists, after five years of being pounded by American military superiority, decided the price they were paying was too high and thus signed a treaty of peace. xxiii  Interestingly, Jefferson understood that in dealing with Islamicists, a drawdown of American forces was bad policy – that an insufficient application of American strength would cause the enemy to escalate their attacks. He therefore initiated a military surge, explaining to Congress:  There was reason . . . to apprehend that the warfare in which we were engaged with Tripoli [Libya] might be taken up by some others of the Barbary Powers [Algiers, Tunis, Morocco, Turkey, et. al]. A reinforcement therefore was immediately ordered. xxiv



Peterson said the reason suburban communities are seen as “nice” and with “decent schools” is because “you have fathers and mothers together” with positive values who built and sustain them. For his part, Peterson has founded a nonprofit called the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny focused on rebuilding the black family. He argues without moral and spiritual change, HUD is simply subsidizing and spreading dysfunction around the country rather than actually helping anyone.
“Children from Section 8 housing don’t just overload schools, they overload schools with children with less interest in learning,” Flaherty said. “Less interest in behaving in class rooms. Less interest in listening to teachers. And greater tendencies for violence, drugs and defiance.  “This is not theory. This is the experience of every neighborhood that has suffered Section 8 housing being inserted into their community.”  “These blacks aren’t separated from whites because of ‘segregation,’” said Peterson. “They’re separated from whites because they’re having children out of wedlock, they’re reliant on the government to pay their rent, food, medical, everything, and so they lock themselves into these government sponsored neighborhoods.”


Choosing the Right College 2014-15: The Inside Scoop on Elite Schools and Outstanding Lesser-Known Institutions       “By far the best college guide in America” —Thomas Sowell, “Easily the best of the college guides” —American Spectator, “Indispensable” —First Things, “An essential reference” —Homeschool Magazine


The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience—the essential qualities of individual liberty and dignity.



In Austin, Texas the Acton Academy was first established as a primary school and has expanded to include all grades. Just seven years later, there are five campuses in Austin with others open or being opened in Houston, San Antonio, Chicago, Southern California, Wisconsin, Washington, D.C. and Central America. Each Acton school places students into “studios” with one each for elementary, middle and high schools. Each one-room studio covers four grade levels with 10-35 children. At Acton, children learn to take individual responsibility, a concept which is being actively discouraged in favor of collective thought in public education. Older students, in addition to their other studies, work at apprenticeships.



Learn more and Sign up here:   http://centerforselfgovernance.com/classes/




Groundbreaking imaging published in 2011 revealed many more of these nerve-to-nerve connections than ever imagined, prompting comparisons between the human brain and the number of switches in all the computers and internet connections on Earth.2 It turns out that the sizes of these connection points, called synapses, shifts with use or disuse—a process called synaptic plasticity. Synapses strengthen when learning occurs or weaken when unused.



Human DNA is programmed to produce about one million different heavy chains and about ten thousand different light chains, each with their own unique amino acid pattern. Each B-cell produces only one specific antibody, made up of two pairs of identical heavy and light chains. That means that the body is able of make, as an estimate, over ten billion (one million times ten thousand) different antibodies, each with its distinct combination of binding sites.



Henig forgot to mention that the “historical errors” were committed by evolutionists following Darwin and his half-cousin, Francis Galton, the father of eugenics. Forced sterilizations that followed were direct results of eugenics, as documented by John West in Darwin Day in America. A sequence at the end of Ben Stein’s 2008 documentary Expelled shows a museum curator at the infamous Hadamar prison stating that the ten thousands of murders of mentally retarded that occurred there, including of children, were based on Darwinism.


The chilling revelations of a recent [1993] television documentary1 expose the disturbing consequences of evolutionary ways of thinking. Beginning in the 1920s, many thousands of people in the United States were sterilised against their will and without their consent, to prevent ‘undesirable breeding’. Over 8,000 of these procedures took place at a major centre to which such ‘undesirables’ were sent, in Lynchburg, Virginia. The victims included some with various degrees of mental retardation; many were simply there because they had been abandoned as a result of broken homes or had suffered some other social misfortune. Some had been honours students at school. They were lied to routinely, being told that it was something ‘for their own good’ or ‘for their health’. Those older ones who discovered the purpose behind the operations realised that they would not be able to leave the institution unless they underwent the procedure.

What was needed was a test case, a ‘patsy’ to ensure that the law would not be declared unconstitutional.  Her lawyer challenged the Laughlin law all the way to the Supreme Court…the presiding judge of the Supreme Court hearing this case in 1924 was Oliver Wendell Holmes4, an influential Darwinist5 who laid the legislative foundation for many of the advances of secular humanism in the United States. Not surprisingly, Holmes declared the law constitutional. It was acceptable for the state to compel the sterilization of those who were deemed ‘socially inadequate’. The forced sterilization of this innocent victim went ahead; subsequent investigation has revealed that the entire story of the ‘feeble-minded generations’ in her family was a fabrication. After the Supreme Court decision, eugenics became a major plank of social policy in many American states. As soon as Hitler (who campaigned on a platform of naked evolutionism—the survival of the fittest race) came to power in 1933, eugenics laws became one of his first acts. Not only was the Nazi program of forced sterilisation for the ‘unfit’ lauded in the U.S.—it was actually modelled after the law framed by Laughlin, who was awarded an honorary doctorate by Hitler’s government. As the Nazis moved on to the euthanasia-murder of entire wards full of mental patients, ‘scientific’ admiration for their ‘racial hygiene’ policies was unabated. One U.S. evolutionist actually stated, ‘The Germans are beating us at our own game’.1 Once it was seen as ‘moral’ to take active steps to ‘purify the German race’, it was just a short, logical step from there to the even greater horrors of the Holocaust.6 



Studies predominantly show that children raised in homosexual environments tend to struggle emotionally more than their peers, are highly more susceptible to drug and alcohol abuse, and often suffer severe depression as young adults.



These genes are unique sets of coding sequences specific to particular creatures. This is a big problem for evolutionary ideas to explain. In a recent research report, scientists describe a new set of 1,307 orphan genes that are completely different between humans and chimpanzees.1  Orphan genes, as the name implies, are found in no other type of creature and therefore have no evolutionary history. This finding is another key prediction of the creation model.   Common genetic code is a predicted feature of purposefully engineered systems in the genomes of creatures that share the same environment and have similar requirements. It’s just like a computer programmer who uses common pieces of code in different software programs.  In support of this creation prediction, scientists discovered that orphan genes are incredibly important for specific biological processes and traits that correspond with specialized adaptations.


a report in USA Today1 had this opening volley: “ Humans and chimpanzees share an almost identical genetic inheritance.” Given that the same report pointed out that there were 40 million differences in the genetic code, one is struck by the blurring of the line between fact and propaganda.









Natural selection, but not evolution:  This ‘supergerm’ problem1  is an increasingly serious concern in Western countries. It strikes precisely those hospitals which are more ‘high-tech’, and handle more serious illnesses. Applying more disinfectant is not the answer; some strains of germs have actually been found thriving in bottles of hospital disinfectant! The more antibacterial chemical ‘weapons’ are being used, the more bacteria are becoming resistant to them.



Census in Quirinius’ time?  Skeptics have argued that Luke got the timing wrong as well. They claim that Quirinius did not become governor until c. 7 AD according to Josephus. Yet according to Matthew’s Gospel, Christ was born before Herod the Great’s death, which occurred in 4 BC. Supposedly, Luke was misled by a great census performed under Quirinius that was very well known.  Some have questioned the account because they believe that it’s implausible that a heavily pregnant woman would be forced to travel so far. It is quite a bit longer, but still, the distance that Jesus’ mother and adoptive father travelled was about 70 miles.


A cursory comparison of the genealogies from David to Joseph show that Matthew has far fewer names than Luke in the genealogy.  The descendants of the house of David would have a particular important inherited title to ensure a succession for—the kingship.  In the first century, it may have still been a matter of public record, because for access to the Temple to worship, a Jew had to be able to prove his ancestry.  Luke on the other hand is a Gentile writing to Gentiles—so showing Jesus’ common ancestry from Adam would be an important part of emphasizing that He is the Savior for all humanity.



trilobite eye, far from being ‘primitive,’ was constructed on the basis of precise optical engineering principles which people only discovered a few centuries ago.  It is pointless to talk of ‘natural selection acting over millions of years’ as the cause of this brilliant design. There is no record of indifferently designed lower lenses. More importantly, there is no need for the trilobite to have had a perfect eye, or even any eye at all. Many had no sight, but there is no evidence that they coped any less well.



Arp’s evidence for galaxy formation by ejection of quasars from the centres of active galactic nuclei is extremely compelling. His photographs of galaxies may well be revealing direct visual evidence of the creative hand of God during Day 4 of Creation Week.  The ejection-of-quasars-from-galaxies interpretation is vigorously rejected by the big bang community. Obviously this is because it utterly demolishes their key assumption of the genesis of all matter at the big bang. It also calls into question many redshift-distances determined by quasar redshifts.  galaxy M31 in Andromeda and a few others in the Virgo cluster have blueshifts and are interpreted as moving towards us.  see A new cosmology: solution to the starlight travel time problem


Cell survival depends on having a plentiful and balanced pool of the four chemical building blocks that make up DNA — the deoxyribonucleosides deoxyadenosine, deoxyguanosine, deoxycytidine, and thymidine, often abbreviated as A, G, C, and T. However, if too many of these components pile up, or if their usual ratio is disrupted, that can be deadly for the cell.

A new study from MIT chemists sheds light on a longstanding puzzle: how a single enzyme known as ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) generates all four of these building blocks and maintains the correct balance among them.

There’s no other enzyme that really can do that chemistry,” she says. “It’s the only one, and it’s very different than most enzymesand has a lot of really unusual features.“   “It’s exquisitely designed so that if you have the wrong substrate in there, you can’t close up the active site,” Drennan says. “It’s a really elegant set of movements that allows for this kind of molecular screening process.”  This four-in-one machine takes on four different shapes depending on whether the RNA nucleotide is A, G, C, or U. It sends out DNA’s four, A, G, C, and T with the appropriate sugar deoxyribose instead of ribose (replacing an OH radical with a hydrogen atom, a “reduction” reaction). But that’s not all this amazing machine does:

The effectors can also shut off production completely, by binding to a completely different site on the enzyme, if the pool of building blocks is getting too big.  RNR is a multi-tool if there ever was one. The effectors, the substrates and the active sites are all closely matched to the operation at hand, whether generating more DNA building blocks or regulating their supply in the cell. A paper from the Annual Review of Biochemistry (2007) puts it this way:  An intricate interplay between gene activation, enzyme inhibition, and protein degradation regulates, together with the allosteric effects, enzyme activity and provides the appropriate amount of deoxynucleotides for DNA replication and repair




Wounded Warrior Project says 80 percent of their money is spent on programs for veterans. That's because they include some promotional items, direct response advertising, and shipping and postage costs.  Take that out, and the figures look more like what charity watchdogs say -- that only 54 to 60 percent of donations go to help wounded service members.  The CEO has said that the fundraising should and can be included in the programs and services.  "I'd be curious to know how asking people for money equates to the assistance of wounded veterans," responded Owens.  But charity watchdog Daniel Borochoff says his biggest concern is that the group is sitting on a $248 million surplus -- and not enough of it is being spent on veterans.



Vaccines and other chemical cocktails reduce and inhibit natural immunity, making us more susceptible to a host of diseases. During the so-called “measles outbreak” connected to the Disney theme park in 2014 it was found that most of those who contracted the measles had been previously vaccinated with the MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine. Studies are also showing that more flu shots make people more susceptible to the flu.  We are told and intimidated by medical propaganda over and over that we must be protected internally from diseases that originate in the external environment. What the establishment does not tell us is that when we are healthy, we have peak immunity and can walk and live among sick people and not get sick.



How could an expert anthropologist have mistaken a 56 year old Caucasian female skull, which was two years old, for a 17–20 year old Native American male skull supposedly having died, “At least 20 years ago”?2 Tyler, recognized nationally and internationally as an expert in the human evolution of Southeast Asia,3 when asked to comment further on how his analysis was so far out stated, “I don’t remember which traits lead me to the conclusion that it was Native American”.4 Had more sophisticated DNA extraction technology not been developed then the expert anthologist’s assessment may still be held up as the most valid today.  When such a large mistake can be made about bones that were less than two years old then surely people should question some of the all-knowing grandiose claims made by evolutionary paleoanthropologists? After all, they are examining bones which are thousands of years older in far less context!


Lahren, originally from Rapid City, S.D., “Four United States Marines are now dead,” Lahren said. “Climate change didn’t kill them. Lack of free community college didn’t kill them. The income gap, wage inequality — nope, not those things either. Gay marriage? Nope. Oh, white racism? Not that either. So what did?”   Obama, if you won’t say it, I will: radical Islam. This is not workplace violence. This is not a criminal act with motives unknown. This is terrorism. The suspected shooter, Muhammad Abdulazeez, a devout Muslim.   I care that our commander-in-chief is more concerned with Muslim sensitivity than the honor and sacrifice made by these Marines.”
Tomi Lahren, 22, a conservative anchor with One America News Network, saw her rant against President Obama go viral after she slammed the White House leader for his failures on ISIS and seeming shoulder shrug at the death of four Marines and a Navy sailor in Chattanooga, Tennessee.   Let’s show [the terrorists] what the United States of America looks like up close and personal. Show them what they’re messing with. Put the fear of God in their desert, because clearly our lack of strategy isn’t working.”
Should we, as a people, accede to those who wish to rule us by agreeing with their premise that rights are fungible and the government is the grantor of whatever freedom it chooses to allow, America will no longer be exceptional or unique.  Our nation will slip back into the norm of history, being ruled without rights with the people taking whatever crumbs that fall out of our master’s hands rather than striving for their own dreams.

When reading the Declaration Of Independence this week, substitute Barack Hussein Obama’s name for that of the King of England. The similarity is astounding in light of what Obama has done to America during the past seven years. We live under a tyrant as oppressive as King George III and it is likely to get worse.

As we explained in this article, a constitutional convention is a far cry from a Convention of States:  The former has the authority to write a new constitution; the latter only has the power to propose amendments to the Constitution we already have, pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Article V itself.  And considering the repeated and flagrant abuses by our federal government, an Article V Convention of States is long overdue.  http://www.conventionofstates.com/levin/?recruiter_id=1390152
Carson is an eminent physician and surgeon. He was a professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and pediatrics at Johns Hopkins, and spent 29 years as the director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital. In a 2001 celebration of "researchers and doctors who are changing our world," Time magazine hailed Carson as one of America's best scientists and physicians. The Library of Congress, no less, declared him a "living legend."
Dr. Ben Carson got robust applause when he responded, "You know, what we do in order to get the information that we need is our business, and I wouldn't necessarily be broadcasting what we're going to do," blasting what he called "this mindset of fighting politically correct wars" and arguing, "We want to utilize the tremendous intellect that we have in the military to win wars ... and if we don't tie their hands behind their back, they will do it extremely effectively."  Carson's attacks on Hillary Clinton have gone almost unremarked by the media, yet they are the most devastating of those of any of the GOP candidates, suggesting that she placed the nation in mortal danger. "She counts on the fact that people are uninformed," he has said, "the Alinsky model, taking advantage of useful idiots. Well, I just happen to believe that people are not stupid."  He added, "If I was trying to destroy this country, what I would do is find a way to drive wedges between all the people, drive the debt to an unsustainable level and then step off the stage as a world leader and let our enemies increase while we decreased our capacity as a military ... and that's what she's doing."
Meanwhile, Carson's top business adviser, Armstrong Williams, has said Mannatech officials ambushed Carson at a forum he filmed in January 2014 that aired the following March on a PBS affiliate in Phoenix, Bloomberg reported.   A year before, Bloomberg reported, Mannatech officials approached Carson to appear in a 2013 video for an African orphanage charity and then edited the videos to make it look as if he were endorsing the company. Mannatech did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The company admitted no wrongdoing in settling the case.
In the New York Times/CBS News survey released Tuesday, Trump maintains the lead of the presidential pack, with 27 percent support. But Carson is within striking distance, at 23 percent, which is within the margin of error of plus or minus 6 percentage points.   The poll's release comes a day before the second Republican presidential debate in California, where Trump will retain center-stage, but Carson will be afforded a bigger spotlight.  Carson is the only candidate to whom Trump would lose a theoretical head-to-head matchup.
California has never been a favorite state for conservatives. Between Berkley radicals and Hollyweird liberals, it seems like the entire state is covered with leftists.  (pleasant surprise!) It showed Trump ahead of the field with 24 percent of the vote. Second was Carson with a strong 18 percent. No other candidate scored in double digits.
He has leadership experience in medicine and business — In addition to performing the first successful surgery on twins conjoined at the head, Carson, a Yale graduate, has also sat on the boards of Costco, Kellogg, and Vaccinogen, a biotechnology company, and launched a national non-profit. "Perhaps a lot of people don't know this, but I've actually done things in my life other than medicine. I have decades of experience on corporate boards," Carson said in an interview with Fox News earlier this month.
Ben Carson:  Gallup poll conducted last year placed him sixth on a list of the most admired men in the world. Many Americans are already familiar with Carson through his books. They include six best-sellers.  11. Carson holds views favored by conservative voters on social issues. He strongly opposes the assertion that abortion is a woman's unrestricted right, opposes same-sex marriage, and strongly favors keeping God in the public sphere, according to OnTheIssues.org.  http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm                12. He also holds views favored by conservatives on a range of other issues. He opposes expanding Obamacare, strongly favors vouchers for school choice, opposes prioritizing green energy, believes marijuana is a gateway drug, opposes a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, opposes a stimulus program to aid the economy, strongly opposes expanding free trade, and has expressed support for "American exceptionalism."
Dr. Ben Carson pulls trigger on 'No. 1 national security threat'
The Republican who is second only to Donald Trump in the polls has just come forward with his plan to tackle what he says is the "No. 1 national security threat."   Will Ben Carson's gutsy idea save America from itself?
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Senate hearing Wednesday on the deal that he never presented Obama with an either-or choice for a nuclear proliferation agreement, the National Review reports.   "At no time did that come up in our conversation nor did I make that comment," Dempsey told Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst. "I can tell you that we have a range of options and I always present them."
all this "is not because of a defect or fault on the part of the president of the United States," the 39th president asserted. "It's just happening in the historical evolutionary, unavoidable circumstance."  Wrong. It isn't "just happening" — any more than the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and his replacement by the Ayatollah Khomeini while Carter was president "just happened."
The Khomeini regime remains in power over 35 years later. The whole threat of Iran arming itself with nuclear weapons today is Carter's doing. If, God forbid, an Iranian bomb ever incinerates a U.S. or European city, historians will blame Jimmy Carter for planting the seed and Barack Obama for its growth into full maturity.   The U.S. doesn't have to resign itself to second-rate status at the hands of China, India, South America or any rising economy. But that is exactly what will happen if we elect more misguided presidents like Carter and Obama, who espouse socialist economics and self-flagellating foreign policies.
With this deal with Iran President Obama has now planted the seeds for World War III, which will now be in the Middle East. Secretary of State John Kerry says it’s either this deal or war but this deal is setting us up for war.
Another major problem is verification of Iranian compliance.  (rerun of Clinton’s inspections of Iraq under Saddam Hussein & Clinton’s Nuclear North Korea)  The administration’s initial insistence on “anytime/anywhere” inspections was downgraded to “sometimes/some places.”  Iran has up to 14 days to weigh the requests of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. If it decides to object, its objections would be relayed to an arbitration committee that would have 7 days to rule. If it rules against Iran, Tehran would have another 3 days to arrange an inspection.  This gives Iran up to 24 days to move, hide or destroy materials sought by inspectors. This is far from a foolproof system, particularly in light of Iran’s long history of cheating.  Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is left largely intact. Centrifuges will be mothballed but not dismantled.  Iran’s illicit nuclear facilities Natanz and Fordow, whose operations were supposed to be shut down under multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions, have now been legitimized, despite the fact that they were built covertly in violation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.  Iran is essentially rewarded for cheating under the agreement.  It gained a better deal on uranium enrichment than Washington has offered to its own allies.  Taiwan, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates were denied enrichment arrangements that Iran now has pocketed.  Instead of dismantling Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, the agreement dismantles the sanctions that brought Tehran to the negotiating table in the first place.  This fact is not lost on our allies, friends and “frenemies” in the region.  Sanctions relief is another potential headache. Tehran would benefit by the release of about $150 billion of its money frozen in overseas accounts.  Ultimately the Iranian economy would be boosted by tens of billions of dollars more through a surge of oil revenues as oil sanctions are lifted.  This could help Iran reshape the regional balance of power and establish hegemony over Iraq, Yemen, important oil resources and oil supply routes.  Much of this money will go to fund the Assad regime, Hezbollah, Yemeni Houthi rebels, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups funded by Iran.  This would rapidly lead to escalation of the wars, shadow wars and civil wars already taking place around the Middle East.
Can you imagine giving a drug dealer 24 days’ notice before you inspect the premises?” Netanyahu said. Netanyahu further noted:   “We think this is not only a threat to us. We think this is a threat to you as well. Iran has killed more Americans than anyone other than al Qaeda. They’re going to get hundreds of billions of dollars to fuel their terror and military machine,” he added.
What we know for certain is that if Congress does not fight for its own prerogatives, then the battle is already lost. And members who refuse to fight are little more than dead weight. If they don’t see their jobs as defending the Constitution, what are they good for?  Clearly, and the Iran nuclear deal is a perfect example — it is touching off an arms race in the Middle East and risking war — U.S. interests are no longer served by the presidential system we have now. And at every turn, for the sake of our liberty, it must be combated until Congress’ rightful powers are restored, starting with the Senate’s treaty ratification power.
After the pro-Western government of China was forced to flee to the island of Taiwan in 1949, when the Communists took over mainland China, bitter recriminations in Washington led to the question: "Who lost China?"  China was, of course, never ours to lose, though it might be legitimate to ask if a different American policy toward China could have led to a different outcome.  In more recent years, however, Iraq was in fact ours to lose, after U.S. troops vanquished Saddam Hussein's army and took over the country. Today, we seem to be in the process of losing Iraq, if not to the Islamic State, then to Iran, whose troops are in Iraq fighting IS.   Had the Bush administration pulled it off, such an achievement in the Mideast could have been a magnificent gift to the entire world, bringing peace to a region that has been the spearhead of war and international terrorism.  (Owebummer & the Retreat & Defeat Democraps could not allow this…) Germany and Japan had been transformed from belligerent military powers threatening world peace for more than half a century to two of the most pacifist nations on earth, in both cases after years of American occupation reshaped these societies. Why not Iraq?  First of all, Germany and Japan were already nations before the American occupation. There was no "nation-building" to do. But Iraq was a collection of bitter rivals — Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds, for example — who had never resolved their differences to form a nation but were instead held together only by an iron dictatorship, as Yugoslavia once was.  Replacing German and Japanese dictatorships with democracy after World War II was a challenge. But both countries remained under American military governments for years, slowly gaining such self-governing powers as the military overseers chose and at such a pace as these overseers deemed prudent in the light of conditions on the ground.  American authorities did not rush to set up an independent government, able to operate at cross purposes because it was "democratically elected" in a country without the prerequisites of a viable democracy.  Despite the mistakes that were made in Iraq, it was still a viable country until Obama made the stubborn decision to pull out all the troops, ignoring his own military advisors, just so he could claim to have restored "peace," when in fact he invited chaos and defeat. This is only the latest of Obama's gross misjudgments about Iraq, going back to his Senate days, when he vehemently opposed the (winning) military "surge" that crushed the terrorist insurgency — as did Sen. Hillary Clinton (oppose the winning surge), by the way.
Obama, again, did what he does best, blame others for things not getting done that he should have done himself.
After months of going around in circles saying he first had no plan to defeat ‘ISIL’ as he refers to ISIS, to then saying he had a game plan, to then saying he was waiting for options to deal with ISIS from the Pentagon.  the President’s modus operandi, “The fact that he would put the blame on the Pentagon has not offered plans is exactly consistent with Obama’s method which is always to blame others.”  What a “leader” we have.  (voting “present” doesn’t work as Prez., more “Hope” & Change..)
(Islamic State & the religion of peace)  The sex slaves of slaughter city: Girls as young as nine forced to have sex with ISIS jihadis who treat them as a sick reward for savagery .  Women are forced to become sex slaves, shared by the brutal jihadis. 
Cyrus continued, “if it happened between a wife and a husband, there’s no such a thing as rape, because the wife is the man’s property. She does not get to say no — or yes.  Cyrus then had a brutal message for President Barack Obama and his Islamophilic attitude.  “What I am trying to tell you … watch Obama say, ‘Let there be no doubt that Islam is part of America,'” Cyrus said. “Well, I want you to know — let there be no doubt (that) raping your mother, your sister, your wife, your daughter is part of Islam.
Sunday, Oren maintained  “it’s a legitimate question” to ask whether the “abandonment” of Obama’s Kenyan Muslim father and Indonesian Muslim stepfather have been partially driving Obama’s policy toward Islam , the Middle East, the war on terrorism and Iran.  Obama’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Muslim who married Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, in 1961 and divorced her three years later.  From age five to age ten or eleven, Obama lived in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, where he seemed to have taken on the surname of his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.
Born to a Muslim father and raised in his early childhood by a Muslim stepfather in a Muslim nation, where he was registered in school as Muslim, Barack Obama has many ties to Islam that have caused some to doubt his profession of Christian faith.
Obama, who as president has supported the Muslim Brotherhood, even referred in a television interview to “my Muslim faith.”
Apparently, he’s done it again.  The headline on C-SPAN following a recent Obama speech in Turkey read: “Did President Obama Just Admit He was Muslim?”

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu got lots of heat last week for asserting that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was an architect of the Nazi extermination of six million Jews.  Whether or not that was an overstatement, and whatever exactly was said between Hitler and al-Husseini at their infamous November 1941 meeting in Berlin, al-Husseini strongly supported the Nazis — from when they were first elected into power in Germany in 1933 — and helped engineer their crimes.  In exposing the selective fact-checking of the New York Times, Catholic League president Bill Donohue last week quoted Mideast historian Kenneth Timmerman, who says al-Husseini "had gone to convince Adolf Hitler of his total dedication to the Nazi goal of extermination of the Jews," offering "to raise an Arab legion to carry out the task in the Middle East."  According to Jerusalem Post writer and "Israeli Solution" author Caroline Glick, al-Husseini made a deal with Hitler to "rally the Arab world to their side" if the fuehrer would support al-Husseini ruling a vast trans-Arab state, "and that Hitler (also) support the genocide of Middle Eastern Jewry."  Glick notes: "As both the official Nazi record and Husseini's summary of the meeting in his diary report, Hitler accepted Husseini's demands."  In the 1930s, al-Husseini's followers in Palestine were giving one another Nazi salutes and sporting swastikas. Then during the war, as Glick points out, "After Hitler agreed to both of Husseini's conditions, Husseini began his active collaboration in the Nazi war effort. He participated in the Holocaust directly. In 1943, he formed the SS Handschar Division comprised of Bosnian Muslims. His troops exterminated 90% of Bosnia's 14,000-member Jewish community."  Mideast Islamists have mass-slaughtered Jews before and are stabbing them randomly today. Whether it's Iran, the Palestinian Authority's Abbas, or IS, can there be any doubt that they can and will commit such mass slaughter in the future?
Reagan replied: “Look, I am the president of the United States, the commander-in-chief. My primary responsibility is the security of the United States. … If we don’t have security, we’ll have no need for social programs.”  The essential question was, “What price peace?” Was it worth $1.72 trillion to build up America’s defenses so that Reagan could end the Cold War at the bargaining table and not on the battlefield?   The African-American columnist Joseph Perkins has calculated that black unemployment fell from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989. The income of black-owned businesses rose almost one-third between 1982 and 1987. The black middle class grew from 3.6 million to 4.8 million during the Reagan years, while the cash income of black households (adjusted for inflation) rose by 12 percent. By contrast, the median income of black households fell by 2.2 percent during the Obama years from 2010 to 2013.
Chamberlain's "Peace for our time" lasted just under a year. 
Comparing Obama to Chamberlain is unfair — to Chamberlain.  There is no question that the British prime minister loved his country and pursued its best interests as he saw it. He was not a "citizen of the world," or worse.  Chamberlain was building up his country's military forces, not tearing them down, as Barack Obama has been doing with American military forces.  Secretary of State John Kerry, and other members of the Obama administration, are saying that the alternative to an agreement with Iran is war. But when Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear reactors back in 1981, Iraq did not declare war on Israel. It would have been suicidal to do so, since Israel already had nuclear bombs.  There was a time when either Israel or the U.S. could have destroyed Iran's nuclear facilities with far less risk of war than there will be after Iran already has its own stockpile of nuclear bombs. Indeed, the choice then will no longer be between a nuclear Iran and war. The choice may be between surrender to Iran and nuclear devastation.  Barack Obama dismissed the thought of America being vulnerable to "a small country" such as Iran. Iran is in fact larger than Japan was when it attacked Pearl Harbor, and Iran has a larger population.  If Japan had had nuclear bombs, World War II could have turned out very differently.  If anyone examines the hard, cold facts about the Obama administration's actions and inactions in the Middle East from the beginning, it is far more difficult to reconcile those actions and inactions with a belief that Obama was trying to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons than it is to reconcile those facts with his trying to stop Israel from stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons. 

(Know it all Obama, Kerry, Hillary Democrap fools..Fundamental Transformation with extra Hope & Change..)  The rules the mullahs follow trace back to the life and example of Muhammad, he said. “And one of the most important tactical victories in Muhammad’s career is what is known as the Treaty of Hudaibiyah.”  Muhammad made this treaty with the pagan Quraysh tribe of Mecca, which was the most powerful tribe in the region at the time.  The Qurayshis entered into a 10-year peace pact with Muhammad and lived to regret it.  It appeared to be a lopsided treaty in favor of the Qurayshis. For instance, if one of Muhammad’s followers wanted to leave and join the Qurayshis, they were free to do so. But if one of the Qurayshis wished to become a Muslim, they were to be rejected and returned to the Quraysh.  With the Quravshis sidelined, Muhammad began attacking several large Jewish tribes in Arabia.  Any men who joined the Muslims in war would receive a significant share of the plunder, booty, slaves and female prisoners.  The Jewish villages fell like Dominos, and the wealth of the Jews became that of the Muslims.  Within two years, the Muslims went from about 1,200 men to more than 10,000.  Muhammad then launched a surprise attack on the Qurayshis and defeated them. The Muslims stood alone as the most powerful group in the Arabian Peninsula.  Richardson said. “Enter into a treaty, a covenant, a ceasefire. But it is only for the purpose of gaining strength to eventually defeat your enemy.  “Muslims today clearly understand ‘Hudaibiya’ to be a code-word which, in brief, means ‘kiss the hand of your enemy until you have the opportunity to cut it off.’”  Bostom also documents in his book that the U.S. State Department has been aware of the Islamic view of treaties with non-Muslim countries since 1880:  “Edward A. Van Dyck, then U.S. Consular Clerk at Cairo, Egypt, prepared a detailed report in August, 1880 on the history of the treaty arrangements (so-called ‘capitulations’) between the Muslim Ottoman Empire, European nations, and the much briefer U.S.-Ottoman experience. Van Dyck’s report – written specifically as a tool for State Department diplomats – opens with an informed, clear, and remarkably concise explanation of jihad and Islamic law.” (“Iran’s Final Solution for Israel, Page 74)  “The Muslim jurists teach that Muslim rulers are never to make a lasting peace with unbelievers but can only make temporary truces, ‘to be broken at the pleasure by the prince and in the interest of the believers,’” Van Dyck wrote in 1880, quoting from the works of Abu al-Hussein el-Quduri of the Hanafite School of doctors, who died in 1037 A.D.  In May 1994, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat addressed a group of Muslims in Johannesburg, South Africa. Arafat didn’t know he was being secretly recorded. At this time, things were looking good for the Middle East peace process. During this speech, Arafat spoke of the ongoing “jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”  The opening words of the treaty of Hudaibiyah are:  “In your name, O God!
This is the treaty of peace between Muhammad Ibn Abdullah and Suhayl ibn Amr. They have agreed to allow their arms to rest for ten years. During this time each party shall be secure, and neither shall injure the other; no secret damage shall be inflicted, but honesty and honour shall prevail between them.” (Learning Islam 8. Islamic Services Foundation. 2009. P. D14.)  Those words could have easily been copied into the current Iranian “agreement,” Gallups believes.
The nuclear proliferation agreement struck between Iran and Western powers “is a deal that is going to make Neville Chamberlain’s Munich Pact with Hitler seem trivial by comparison,” actor, author and former White House speechwriter Ben Stein said…Chamberlain was the British prime minister who in 1938 made a deal conceding portions of Czechoslovakia to Adolf Hitler's Germany. Hitler claimed the region and went on to invade Poland. World War II broke out within a year.
Netanyahu Slams Iran Deal: "A Historic Mistake"
former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton accused the commander in chief of the “worst act of appeasement by an American president in history, bar none.”   “I don’t think there is an acceptable deal” to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, “as long as this regime remains in power,” because it has violated virtually every commitment it has ever made.  He also insisted Iran will not stop, no matter how long it takes, until it gets both nuclear weapons and inter-continental ballistic missiles capable of hitting targets anywhere in the world, including the U.S.
On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show: If our Constitution was still relevant and if our republic was still in place, President Obama would have been impeached by now. He’s been involved in numerous scandals and controversies, and his nuclear deal with an Islamo-nazi regime is the latest impeachable offense. John Kerry is acting as a special pleader for Obama and Iran, not for the American people. Both Kerry and Obama have committed our future to a deal with secret side deals that they don’t even know about. This is why the Framers put a treaty process in place – a system that’s been destroyed by Obama, Kerry, and the Republican-run Congress. Also, we have a few real patriots in Congress, like Mark Meadows, who called in to discuss his motion to strip John Boehner of his speakership. We need more men and women willing to fight and put their career on the line to do what is right and challenge the weak GOP leadership. Boehner and Mitch McConnell have been doing Obama’s dirty work for too long. They don’t represent us; they represent lobbyists and corporatists.
(Ditch Mitch and the RHINOs; only 2 patriots--CRUZ & LEE)  The Senate vote on Monday was a cloture vote to proceed to a “clean” continuing resolution—meaning it included taxpayer funds for Planned Parenthood. It passed 77-19. In the process of filing the bill, Sen. Mitch McConnell “filled the tree,” meaning he himself inserted various amendments to then block out all other senators from offering their own amendments. By the way, this was the same tactic used habitually by his Democrat predecessor, Harry Reid, to stifle debate and block senators from offering amendments.  After the cloture motion passed, Cruz sought to use the tools of the Senate to remove the amendment tree to offer his own amendment. He was then denied a sufficient second, and thus denied an opportunity to offer his amendment. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, was the only one who rose in support.  But in this case, McConnell decided that the way the Senate has historically operated no longer applies. As he did with Cruz this week, and as he did when Cruz and Lee tried to secure votes to repeal Obamacare and to defund Planned Parenthood on a transportation funding bill in July, he orchestrated other members not raising their hands and offering a second, and then required the chair to enforce the regular order (which, historically, is not enforced for this purpose).   So when Cruz wanted to offer his amendment, suddenly he had to have one-fifth of the members physically present and consenting to give him a sufficient second. Basically, McConnell is applying one set of rules to everyone else, and one set to Cruz and Lee, and in a completely arbitrary way in that he doesn’t tell anyone he’s suddenly going to enforce these rules.  To suddenly decree yourself the arbiter of what “deserves” a vote and what does not overturns years of precedent and sets a dangerous new standard for both the Senate and representative democracy.
On Friday the House of Representatives is set to vote on a reconciliation bill that repeals only parts of Obamacare. This simply isn’t good enough,” Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah; Ted Cruz, R-Texas; and Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said in a joint statement. 
In 2009, the CBO concluded that this system is so comprehensive that it very nearly transforms all private insurance into “an essentially governmental program” where “all payments related to health insurance policies should be recorded as cash flows in the federal budget.”   To that end, passing a full-repeal bill, forcing President Obama to veto it, and holding override votes would further delegitimize this illegitimate law and make Obamacare a central focus of the presidential election.
(the House that won’t defund anything or impeach Owebummer…)  Adopted on July 30, 2014, House Resolution 676 authorized the speaker to file suit. On January 6, 2015, the House in the new 114th Congress adopted HR 5, authorizing itself to succeed the 113thHouse as a plaintiff in the lawsuit.  The House claims it has never appropriated any funds for §1402, yet the administration “nonetheless drew and spent public monies on that program beginning in January 2014.” This violates Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”
First, appeasement always brings short-term jubilation at the expense of long-term security. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was a beloved peacemaker after the Munich Agreement of 1938 with Adolf Hitler but derided as a conceited fool and naif by May 1940.   A few years from now -- after Iran has used its negotiated breathing space to rearm, ratchet up its terrorist operations and eventually gain a bomb to blackmail its neighbors -- the current deal will be deeply regretted.  Third, appeasers always wrongly insist that the only alternative to their foolish concessions is war. Just the opposite is true.
Time was not on Iran's side. Tehran was growing desperate for financial and commercial relief from global sanctions and embargoes. In contrast, the world had no such urgency and could have easily waited for a cash-strapped and ostracized Iran to give up on a bomb.  There were plenty of alternatives short of war in dealing with Hitler from 1936 to 1939, but none after. Expect that in five years Iran will be better armed, richer, more confident, more aggressive -- and nearly impossible to deter without the use of force.  Fourth, beneficiaries grow to hate their appeasers. Such ingratitude might seem counterintuitive, given the gifts that the Iranians have just received from the Obama administration. But we should remember that Hitler called his Munich appeasers "worms" and pushed them even further.
Both the House and Senate just passed legislation in April — H.R. 1191, the so-called Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) (see which traitors voted for this bill that is likely the Neville Chamberlains-Obama-Kerry-Hillary-Democrap & Rhino’s Peace in our times Munich Agreement, 1938 )— that will make it virtually impossible to stop the deal now.   Congress “turned the normal treaty ratification process on its head by requiring a veto override of two-thirds votes in both houses in order to stop the deal rather than the constitutionally required two-thirds majority in the Senate for ratification.”  And every member of Congress who voted for the Corker legislation knew it.  The bill came just a short month after 47 Senate Republicans led by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote a letter to the mullahs in Tehran that it is the Senate, not the president, who approves treaties.  Rather than defend that position, and require that Obama submit any nuclear treaty with Iran to the Senate for ratification, Congressional Republicans capitulated and ceded the Senate’s Article II, Section 2 treaty ratification power. 
So who was the one person (one patriot) to vote against the (corker’s iran nuclear deal) bill? Tom Cotton.
The Treaty Making Power of the Executive…It must indeed be clear to a demonstration that the joint possession of the power in question, by the President and Senate, would afford a greater prospect of security, than the separate possession of it by either of them.  If two thirds of the whole number of members had been required, it would, in many cases, from the non-attendance of a part, amount in practice to a necessity of unanimity. And the history of every political establishment in which this principle has prevailed, is a history of impotence, perplexity, and disorder. Proofs of this position might be adduced from the examples of the Roman Tribuneship, the Polish Diet, and the States-General of the Netherlands, did not an example at home render foreign precedents unnecessary.
Activist lawyer Larry Klayman, a veteran of courtroom battles with presidents, including Bill Clinton and George Bush, is suing President Obama and others over the newly announced deal with Iran, alleging its ratification process is unconstitutional.
“A president cannot lawfully override or amend a treaty simply by issuing an order, even if he calls it an executive order or some other form of international agreement,” the action, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, explains.
Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch, previously has sued Cuban interests, Iranian officials and others.  His new complaint names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama, Sens. Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson of Florida and his congressman, Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Fla.  He alleges that the federal officials “acted in disregard of their obligations to uphold the U.S. Constitution” in support of a bill through which the Iranian deal – which could give Tehran hundreds of billions of dollars and allow it to pursue its nuclear program – is being ratified.  It explains that the Constitution empowers a president to make a treaty only if two-thirds of the U.S. Senate votes to ratify it..  However, Klayman asserted, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act signed May 22, 2015, violates the Constitution by changing the method for ratifying treaties, who ratifies treaties and the minimum vote required.
On Monday, Levin called for Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to resign.  He wrote on his Facebook page:
It is time for Mitch McConnell and John Boehner to resign for the good of the nation and the Republican Party.   It is time for younger, wiser, and more courageous Republican leadership – constitutional conservatives who understand the role of a statesman in perilous times –
On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show: The Republican led Senate should have treated this Iran deal as a treaty from the beginning no matter what President Obama did. The real issue is that Obama couldn’t get a treaty approved because there are a lot of Democrats questioning this deal and the Republicans let Obama get away with it. John Kerry says we can’t pass treaties anymore because they are hard to pass, basically saying the hell with treaties. Also, we need to stop the lefts destruction of our children and grandchildren. Just look how the Obama’s and the Boehner’s are destroying their kids future’s with massive debt and entitlements.
TPNN News Director Scottie Nell Hughes on CNN: “What has the GOP Congress done? Only 1 Veto from President!”
Obama has had no reason to veto these spending bills. The one time he did veto a spending bill was when Democrats were in the majority.  With Republicans in control of the House since 2011, and the Senate since the beginning of 2015, no spending bill has actually reached Obama’s desk to even be vetoed. They were all pre-negotiated settlements.  Spending bills that might have achieved something were never able to overcome the Senate filibuster, so Obama did not have to veto them.  This has always been a problem. Since the advent of Rule XXII establishing cloture 98 years ago, Republicans have never had a filibuster-proof majority. (this rule needs to be terminated, it is not in the constitution) And if history holds, they likely never will.  And until the filibuster is eliminated, at least on appropriations bills, and entitlement programs require periodic reauthorization, the Congress’ power of the purse will remain tenuous at best, leading to the very sort of crisis management we see today.

Now that we’ve forced Boehner out of his Speakership, his minions in Congress are scrambling to maintain their power. We’ve got to stop them. We cannot allow more spineless moderates to take over the leadership. We cannot allow the establishment to take this victory from us.
If you agree, send a message to your congressman today, and demand that they elect conservative leadership in the House.
The Congress, particularly the Senate, has not only a clear justification but a constitutional duty to scrap the legally defective and, now, factually nigh-irrelevant Corker review process, codified as the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015.
The Corker bill does not prescribe congressional authority to review or approve agreements on ballistic missiles and other weapons. And as has become embarrassingly clear, it does not even prescribe congressional authority to review all the sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear program.  Many of the sanctions and understandings Obama’s Iran deal aims to undo were not adopted to block Iran’s nuclear program. They were adopted to combat Iran’s promotion of terrorism, and its acquisition and proliferation of weapons.  The president is recklessly compromising national security, materially supporting the world’s leading sponsor of jihadist terror, undermining the Constitution he is sworn to uphold, and grossly eroding American sovereignty by transferring to Putin, the Chinese, the Europeans, and the mullahs decisions about American defense requirements that belong to the American people. The Congress has an obligation to stop this. Yet, the curiously influential Senator John McCain has managed to convince himself that Congress’s considerable foreign affairs powers are not rooted in the Constitution but dependent on what label (“treaty,” “agreement,” “convention” …) a willful president decides to stick on deals he cuts with foreign sovereigns. This is quite a turnaround for Senator McCain, who did not seem to think President Bush’s labeling of an interrogation tactic as “enhanced” stopped Congress from calling it “torture” and using every power available to lawmakers to undo it.  In any event, contrary to what the Senator and many of his fellow bipartisan Beltway graybeards appear to believe, the framers did not write preemptive surrender into Article I.   If you scrutinize President Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, you find that the president ignores the existence of the Corker process. So should Congress.  Obama’s Iran deal also ignores the existence of Congress itself – at least, of the United States Congress. As I’ve previously detailed (piggy-backing on characteristically perceptive analysis by AEI’s Fred Kagan), the deal does expressly defer to the Iranian Congress, conceding that key Iranian duties are merely provisional until the jihadist regime’s parliament, the Majlis, has an opportunity to review them as required by Iran’s sharia constitution. The United States Constitution, however, is a nullity in the eyes and actions of this imperial White House.   Congress must use its power of the purse, its appointment power, its power over legislation, and, if necessary, and its power to impeach executive branch officials (the State Department might be a good place to start) to pressure Obama. The objective is not to get His Majesty to hold off on a Security Council resolution until the Corker review process is complete – the Corker review process as enacted does not cover the Iran deal as written.  the Congress can get busy enacting a constitution-tracking resolution: one that affirms that Congress has the power to insist that international agreements be treated as treaties, or at least regular legislation, if they are to be legally enforceable. If they are not thus approved by a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate or an act of Congress, they have no standing as binding law – they are mere executive agreements that can be abandoned at any time by either the president who makes such an agreement or by a future president.   For the framers and throughout most of American history, such perfidy would so patently have warranted impeachment that no president would have tried it – truly, the country would never have elected a manner of man who would consider trying it. We live, however, in a uniquely perilous time, when Congress is as determined to abdicate its constitutional responsibilities as Obama is to violate his.
Some pieces of legislation, like the Iran nuclear deal, are simply so consequential that they demand revisions to the Senate’s procedures," the letter said.  The current threshold is 60 votes, which the GOP majority has lacked in order to break a Democratic filibuster that would allow the Senate to vote to reject the deal.  The Democrats have blocked three attempts to break the filibuster this month, with the latest being on Thursday. The chamber had until then to vote on the deal.   The accord, reached in July, would pump as much as $150 billion into Iran's economy that has been held up over five years through crippling sanctions in exchange for curbs on it nuclear arsenal.  The House voted 269-162 last Friday to reject the agreement. No Republicans backed the deal, and 25 Democrats broke ranks to oppose it.  Obama has promised to veto rejection of the deal, and he now has the necessary Democratic votes to sustain an override.  Senate Democrats voted in 2013 when they were in the majority to prevent filibusters on many of Obama's nominees.

They’re not even trying. I don’t care what the issue is. The big three: Amnesty, Obamacare, Iran. Nothing! Zilch! No opposition to anything.  He began naming names of the Republican leadership, including Senate Majority Leader McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner, saying, “They have turned to mush.”   “We could speculate, you know, what does ‘follow the money’ mean?” Limbaugh wondered aloud. “Is there blackmail? Is there bribery going on or promises of financial wealth after retirement or whatever? Except these guys don’t retire and go home. They stay there. So I don’t know.”
If you look at what has occurred in the U.S. Senate since Republicans took a majority, we immediately returned after winning a historic majority to pass a trillion-dollar “CRomnibus” bill filled with corporate welfare and pork. Then, the so-called Republican majority voted to fund Obamacare. Then, the so-called Republican majority voted to fund President Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesty. Then, the so-called Republican majority voted to confirm Loretta Lynch as attorney general. Then, the so-called Republican majority voted to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, an egregious example of cronyism and corporate welfare.   Every one of those is the priority of the Minority Leader Harry Reid. Every one of those is the priority of the Republican leader, Mitch McConnell. They operate as a team, expanding Washington and undermining the liberty of the people.
What we saw in the Senate on Sunday is unprecedented in the annals of Senate history. It consisted of the majority leader and the minority leader denying members the ability to have votes on their amendments and indeed the ability even to have a roll-call vote. The denial of a second for a vote, which was aggressively whipped by the Republican majority, is an extraordinary measure designed to gag senators and enforce the will of the McConnell-Reid leadership team.   It makes clear that the McConnell-Reid leadership team is united in favor of big government spending and debt and power.  The McConnell-Reid leadership team has no interest in cutting off one penny of funds to Planned Parenthood, which is why leader Mitch McConnell blocked a vote on defunding Planned Parenthood.
Please sign the “Defund Planned Parenthood and Dismantle ObamaCare” Petition. 
pre-Obamacare Medicaid already straining state budgets, already struggling with access problems, and already  failing the truly indigent on an empirical level.  Obamacare took a wheezing, bloated program beset with systemic challenges and expanded it to millions of additional Americans. The results have been predictable and tragic.  Beyond the aforementioned shortcomings, one of its supporters' chief selling points has also been debunked by reality.  Medicaid's enormous new burdens render the program even less effective and accessible for those who need it most: The very poor.
The following is excerpted from the Shoebat FoundationNEW VIDEO Shows Christian Fighters Fighting And Killing ISIS Terrorists With Heavy Machine Guns, Canons And Rocket Launchers, Saying, “We Will Burn Them, All Of Them.” (And Yet Obama Is Not Supporting Them!)  By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat:  A video has just been released of well-trained Christian warriors fighting ISIS with machine guns, canons and explosives. There is also a part of the video showing a Christian fighter taking down an ISIS flag. They made the video as an expression of outrage against the Obama administration for not including them as part of the coalition against ISIS Here is the video:
“The U.S.-led coalition spent a whole year pretending they were striking ISIL targets, but where are the results of these strikes?” asked Puskov.   According to figures compiled by the CFR, the U.S.-led air campaign has dropped an average of 43 bombs per day on Islamic State group targets, a far cry from the approximate 6,163 per day during the 1991 invasion of Iraq to free Kuwait, or even the roughly 1,000 plus bombs per day during the 2003 invasion to oust Saddam Hussein.  Though there are many potential reasons and plausible theories for Obama’s weak and half-hearted campaign against the Islamic State terror group, Russia doesn’t particularly care what those might be.  Instead, Russia is committed to supporting the Assad regime and stabilizing Syria, which means they will do whatever they deem necessary against the Islamic State, including wiping them out, to achieve that goal.  The only thing Obama is committed to is transforming America into a socialist Utopia… and his next tee time.
U.N. Says Four Million Refugees Have Left Syria
Thanks to Hillary Clinton, Biden and Barack Hussein Obama's assault on Syria, millions have lost their homes and all hope of returning to Syria - and ISIS has risen as one of the most powerful terrorist groups on earth.
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah promised yet another increase in the number of Hezbollah fighters in Iraq, calling for a united international response against ISIS. “Today we are facing a kind of danger that is unprecedented in history, which targets humanity itself,” he said, calling for no one to “bury their heads in the sand.”  “We are present today in many places and we will be present in all the places in Syria that this battle requires,” Nasrallah promised.  The Islamic State itself appears to see Iran as a bigger threat than anti-ISIS Sunni governments.
Ramadi falls. The Iraqi army flees. The great 60-nation anti-Islamic State coalition so grandly proclaimed by the Obama administration is nowhere to be seen.  Instead, it's the defense minister of Iran who flies into Baghdad, an unsubtle demonstration of who's in charge.  Bush bequeathed to Obama a success. By whose measure? By Obama's. As he told the troops at Fort Bragg on Dec. 14, 2011, "We are leaving behind a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq, with a representative government that was elected by its people." This was, said the president, a "moment of success."  Which Obama proceeded to fully squander.   With the 2012 election approaching, he chose to liquidate our military presence in Iraq. We didn't just withdraw our forces. We abandoned, destroyed or turned over our equipment, stores, installations and bases.  We surrendered our most valuable strategic assets, such as control of Iraqi airspace, soon to become the indispensable conduit for Iran to supply and sustain the Assad regime in Syria and cement its influence all the way to the Mediterranean.  And, most relevant to the fall of Ramadi, we abandoned the vast intelligence network we had so painstakingly constructed in Anbar province, without which our current patchwork operations there are largely blind and correspondingly feeble.  The current collapse was not predetermined in 2003 but in 2011. Isn't that what should be asked of Hillary Clinton? We know you think the invasion of 2003 was a mistake. But what about the abandonment of 2011? Was that not a mistake?  On your watch, we gave up our position as the dominant influence over a "sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq" — forfeiting that position gratuitously to Iran. Was that not a mistake? And where were you when it was made?
“You want to see our future, look at Greece,” said Jindal, who is running to be the Republican nominee for president in 2016. “Taxes are too high, government spending is too high, pensions are underfunded, regulations are stifling the economy and private sector growth is too slow. But there is one key difference. The EU [European Union] may decide to bail out Greece. There is nobody that can bail out America.
(Democraps’ plan for the USA..more fundamental transformation & hope & change..) 
Without huge emergency assistance from the European Central Bank — a decision that faces long odds — the government will find it hard to get money to the country's automated teller machines, let alone re-open the banks.  4. As hoarding increases, shortages of goods, including fuel and food, will intensify. Capital and payments controls will be tightened. The economy will take another worrisome step down, worsening unemployment and poverty. And the government will struggle to pay pensioners and the salaries of civil servants.
(Democraps’ plan for the USA..more fundamental transformation & hope & change..) 
Greece in shock as banks shut after snap referendum call.  Stunned Greeks faced shuttered banks, long supermarkets lines and overwhelming uncertainty on Monday as a breakdown in talks between Athens and its international creditors plunged the country deep into crisis.  With Greece's bailout expiring on June 30 and an IMF payment falling due at the same time, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras pleaded by phone with European officials to extend the programme until a referendum on Sunday on its future terms. The frantic efforts to secure Greece's place within the euro zone followed a dramatic weekend. Tsipras's decision, early on Saturday, to put the aid package to a popular vote took the lenders and some of Tsipras's own negotiating team by surprise.
It also pushed Greece towards defaulting on 1.6 billion euros ($1.77 billion) due to the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday.
Greeks - used to lengthy talks with creditors before an eleventh-hour deal - were left shocked by the turn of events. Lines snaked outside ATMs and inside supermarkets while fears of disruptions to petrol and medicine supplies grew.
The big lie is that Greece has already lived through austerity. This is a nation that in 2013 was spending up to 59 percent of its GDP on government benefits and programs. Even today the government accounts for half of all spending. How is that austerity? The problem is as the private economy shrinks, the government’s role keeps expanding. Greece’s debt was 120 percent of GDP a decade ago, and now its 175 percent. This is the opposite of austerity. It is a spendfest.  In sum, Greece needs much less socialism, and much more privatization. Sell off government assets. Cut tax rates. Sell one of the islands to Disney. Oust the communists who ruined this nation. Get government spending down to 25 percent of GDP.
depositors have consistently withdrawn their funds from Greek banks. Many of those moving their money explicitly fear a Greek departure from the eurozone and a re-denomination of Greek deposits into some kind of new drachma that, given Greece’s troubles, would surely depreciate in value. They have sought to neutralize this risk by moving their assets to safer repositories overseas or simply to the local Greek branches of seemingly more secure German or Dutch banks. Some of those putting their money in motion in this way might have less specific concerns, but nonetheless share a prudent sense that their liquid wealth might better reside in places distant from their own troubled country. Whatever the motivations, the outflows, which European Union (EU) officials recently estimated at some €2.0 billion a day, have already limited liquidity at Greek banks, constrained flows of lendable funds to Greek consumers and businesses, and, in so doing, made a weak economy that much weaker. Meanwhile, capital controls to keep the money in place will hardly encourage bank lending or instill confidence in the economy’s future.2     
(Democraps’ plan for the USA..more fundamental transformation & hope & change..) 
The governor described his need to pull his island out of a "death spiral" and said Puerto Rico's debts were "not payable". The island has $72 bn in municipal debt, a higher level per capita than any US state. The island's debt is currently trading at eight-times the face value of Detroit’s bonds, and is widely held by individual US investors in mutual funds or other accounts, many of whom might not realize it.
(Democrap Progressive “Paradise”)  The final straw came this week when Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp. paid just $628,000 on a $58 million payment that was due.  The commonwealth bears most of the blame for its fiscal failure, but the U.S. is complicit as well.  For starters, the Jones Act requires ships carrying goods from one U.S. port to another to be U.S.-built, owned and staffed. Economists in trade-dependent Puerto Rico estimate that the law costs the island close to half a billion dollars a year — a huge amount.  In the 1990s, President Clinton closed military bases on the island, hitting local economies hard. The government also got rid of corporate tax preferences for